Hi everyone,
I'm borrowing these shares:
30xSS
30xBFLS
75xFPGA.contract
You could choose the pay due from either 4 or 8 weeks after the lending date.
4 weeks - 120% of the dividends paid to lenders. 8 weeks - 125% of the dividends paid to lenders. Each payment will not be later than 24 hours later than the corresponding asset issuers pay their dividends.
Q: What are you going to use them for? A: I'm going to do market making for them. Borrowing shares is a way to hedge my risk.
Q: Does it have something to do with your fund "MU"? A: Yes, 75%-100% of the profits will go to MU. Since I haven't raised any motion for allowance of any forms of borrowing, I myself will take all the risk with my own Bitcoin reserve.
Please reply or PM me for details. Witnesses are also invited.
what has been seen can not be unseen ; )
|
|
|
amazon : )))
|
|
|
Without a motion? Huh?
U R right, there was another reason for the falling mining rate ... OTOH, catch of the month: (FPGA rig mines on/off as it's being checked card by card so I'm glad to catch a moment when it's off and got a look at the founding 7 all mining and well above 6 Gh/s; by well above I mean adjusted for dead shares - those afaik are not included in the mining speed) thanks, made my day
|
|
|
Syndicate hashrate down from ~12 GH to ~3. What's going on?
I guess the power is being redirected I saw a moment when the FPGA rig was mining at 1 gh/s, as if the majority of boards was reconfigured ... it was dropping since then.
|
|
|
the winner of the bounty told me to send it to a charity, so im trying to do so...
is health care of monks in nepal and india charitable enough? if so, PM me for details, please
|
|
|
Okay, this bot works. I'm rather sure it will hold up in the mail. It is not really pretty but well, it works:) Again it is 330 ML so if you want to add toyour order let me know. I will be shipping everything again next week.
the initial variety to choose from still valid? about to finalize my order during w/e
|
|
|
EU Bank Transfer
please drop me PM or answer skype calls : )))
|
|
|
do you collect otc web of trust rating? if so, glad to leave you +1 for everything
I do. I'm amazingrando on OTC also, so if you want to leave a rating, that'd be great! rating #10439
|
|
|
53 btc repaid
confirmed && thanks! do you collect otc web of trust rating? if so, glad to leave you +1 for everything sorry for the late reply
|
|
|
such as this guy. maybe he's obnoxious and his expectations unrealistic but he's kinda polite contributor (though off topic with regard to "IPO handling and interaccount transfers discussion)". one day it might become an issue : )
|
|
|
did any of you had a look at: http://www.slcapex.com/and asked the question if the second life capital exchange is regulated? my opinion is similar to trading imaginary money for virtual stock and if you want to regulate that, please remember to take your meds.
|
|
|
thank you, will leave otc feedback.
|
|
|
There is already 2 year prison time in Latvia for possessing equipment that is capable of changing IMEI codes on phones. So for older phone models COM cable in your apartment is all the cops need to get you in prison.
almost as safe as cp (to send someone to jail). that's harsh and can not be prevented by full hdd encryption (works against cp planting) : (
|
|
|
@mila 1) "should" is also what I think, but my offer on https://glbse.com/asset/view/PPT.A for example is in a spot that I think does not represent the time it was posted - I just posted a second buy offer and now the ordering of all the 1.0BTC offers is completely different than before. I don't need to see timestamps, but it would be nice to at least see it like "first the ones on the top get sold and then lower and lower until the bottom/last share". Right now it is in no way clear how good my chances are (well, they are fairly high, if it really is just about timing...) of getting a share if they would for example only sell ~500 shares, matching not all 1.0 offers. hm. ok, this description is something i can work with. if you can/want, go to dev.glbse.com, please create two accounts and try to bid on an asset (altering those accounts and use different quantities at same price, to help me reproduce) please try tick and use prices below 99 to avoid trading (seems not working, page loading would not finish. but it's good enough to create orders for the order book and see how they will be sorted and added to the list). this was a bug but this might be only a display issue. nevertheless let's give it a proper test 2) I guess it would jsut be nice to know if you're buying from the issuer or someone else I guess...
hm, makes kinda sense. but if the issuer transfers shares out and sells from there, we have a workaround (some uses are valid - p.ex. Meni's unsold mining bonds he want's to have out if issuer's account) i see how it would be nice (to know when i help a company to raise capital and when it's just sale of somebody else) but not sure if/how usefull
|
|
|
1) I'd like to see timestamps at orders (or at least have them ordered by time submitted) - important for "auction style" IPOs like the PPT.a/b/c... IPOs. Also: If there are in total 5000 bids @1.0BTC each and only 2000 shares are sold, does GLBSE indeed pay the ones first that are the oldest orders or in any other (random?!) order?
2) Also it would be great to have my own orders on assets in bold and orders by the issuer of the asset in italic (or something along these lines)
afaik 1) works like that. you see your own orders sorted by timestamp (mixed by asset but sorted by timestamp). no need to see timestamps of orders of other users. they should be however matched oldest first (at same ask/bid price) 2) it's been requested, to have own orders marked so not sure if labeling issuer's orders makes sense (i see why it might be interested to know what is a buy back order from issuer but not sure if that's standard out there in real world) please explain in more detail
|
|
|
multi-line order entry?
let's say I want to offer shares for sale like 100 @ 0.90 100 @ 0.95 100 @ 1.00 110 @ 1.10 120 @ 1.20 (a fixed rows count table would do, let's say 5 entries at a time should be enough for now ; )) and make it 5 rows for both sell / buy. adding liquidity ; )
now when creating an order I get every time redirected back to my portfolio and have to either scroll down to the asset and hit buy/sell or click the asset's view page and then buy/sell. glad i can remember which asset i was trading but also this might become an issue with time.
it would be kind of advanced gui feature but makes sense even in basic setup. & i hope there are other active users who would appreciate that.
hands up, please!
o/
|
|
|
How am I not?
f*ck, i need more coffee (or sleep) /me was searching for com* instead of co* or cop* <drama> mea culpa, mea cupla, mea maxima culpa my initial post lost meaning. please show me the way to the seppuku thread </drama>
|
|
|
What do you mean by "estimated time between hacks"
the elephant in the room ... "a lot of websites" processing bitcoins one way or the other report security issues. either wallets compromised or attacks preventing the use of the service or just go missing in action what they have in common is they go tits up with funds in custody. not able to give you 'exact' numbers if it's majority by domain name count or just a huge part of the ecosystem or a minor problem (don't trust me on that one, it's not a minor problem). to an unbiased observer this might appear as a major issue and a question of time until it happens first time then next time, thus we should be able to calculate the mean time between hacks. even the bitcoin faucet was pwned!!! there are no more honest thieves out there?
|
|
|
|