objection. funds lost in the gox event did not burn but exist and are technically spendable
or did I miss any small print?

thanks for the clarification. I think i got it at least partially right with the bold part.
meaning: if he has 1 input and wants to spend it, the transaction can be fairly small. we do not know how many inputs (s)he combines in the 0.5 btc balance (might be a miner with daily payouts from a pool with a single card mining since April ...)

& (s)he can still try to broadcast the spending and get it included in the free space in each block. I managed to get a free tx included after 24 hours earlier this year.

there's a field where you can specify the fees you want to pay. I think they override the calculated/proposed fees if you leave it blank.
afaik you could get away with .0005 btc fees or simply try to broadcast your transaction to the network without any fees what so ever.
what also matters are your incoming btc transactions that you want use as input in your spending. size of transaction is a factor in fee calculation.
could you re-try?
if in doubt, just start with 0 fees and send bitcoins to yourself, just to see if you can do it
or try with the minimum recommended 0.0005 again just to see if it works for you.

and older orders are matched first (at the same price).
they might be however displayed in wrong order (at the same price) newer orders (at the same price) above older orders
but the execution is OK

the statistics and financial pages are both up & running. at the time of writing there were about 155 + 7.5 btc in the books
7.5 for dividends where the growth fund 80 % of income were already accounted
and 155 btc growth + dividends.
not really sure how to account for the funds gone with the gox.

https://mtgox.com/press_release_20120605.html
gox supported google authenticator as early as june 05
hindsight 20/20

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95738.0;topicseen
another reused password leads to pwned gox account.

in the past sometimes bitcoind died unnoticed and glbse did not noticed deposits.
not sure if it happened recently or is fixed permanently. however if there are 10+ confirmations and no change in your glbse balance, then best thing to do is imho drop a mail to support@

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=41892.msg643440#msg643440
check this out ^^

hm, different error message would make more sense. sure

very interesting observation.

edit: just checked Block #180966 via http://www.blockchain.info/block-index/229374/00000000000009109a556cf6c997f1ec10afa32fa53064b59a5fa0c026d200ee
and it really says relayed by p2pool while the distribution of mined coins looks unusual

but the blocks you mention are quite old (may 22 - may 28). did you see one recently?
meaning if it is common or just happened few times


not sure if solo mining with 10GH would net 6 blocks in 6 days.
also not sure if first relay info recorded at blockchain.info is 100% correct
if it is a solo miner I would bet he's running much more hashing power and directs only 10 gh/s of it to p2pool for whatever reason
i can also speculate that it is computable and possible to patch default p2pool miner to behave like this. either a bug or tuning

address in OP mined so far 250 btc in transactions corresponding to p2pool mining payout
address 18tyjr looks like 9 block reward.
good catch!

or secretly invest bitcoins in users accounts into some bonds and financial products to leverage users trust and why not start offering credit from the coins not used and sitting in the accounts?
srsly, no adds, please.

please recall how gigamining was issued. private (otc) sales before ipo bought bonds at 1 btc / bond, thus selling at 1.20-1.30 still represents a 20-30 % profit (plus the dividends from the meantime of holding the bond)

it is not true that selling is easier i.e. it does not cost anything - the sell order blocks the shares and prevents them from being transferred or offered for sale at a different price. thus you can't have fake sale wall the same way as you can't have a fake buy wall. what you see in the order book is what you can have. nothing else.

if you expect bitcoin / shares in the future and want to make the order now, hm, no worky. wait and act after you have the funds in your account.
even if you have a regular income and would like to post a permanent order that would be filled per partes as the funds arrive, can't do it right now.

finally someone noticed. can I remove the asks for a single share at 1000 btc?

transfer them to nefario

rewording the above statement - you need to get rid of them - as soon as balance is zero shares, asset disappears from portfolio

I cut off the earnings at 31/5 while you include also matured June mining payout. that should explain the diff between my forecast and your calculations. otherwise hooray for another month dividends \o/

very unofficial May dividend forecast 0.00280
; )

https://glbse.com/asset/view/TYGRR.BOND-B
or like this ^^

no kidding, Sherlock?

I mean, thank you for rising awareness but it's really well known or at least documented and the bundled browser has the settings right by default.

mit oder ohne kauf beleg, bitte?