Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 12:01:44 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 »
421  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? on: January 30, 2016, 10:45:52 AM
Issue update:

Solution: Deploy Classic with security errors and pocket redditard's funds.

Grin
422  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? on: January 30, 2016, 10:04:56 AM
Ok. I admit it. I am a shill and associated Theymos. We want to undermine Bitcoin.

Let me tell you what I really believe:

Honestly, Core vision, if you do the math, is not viable in the long run.

There must be a considerable capacity increase when block reward diminish otherwise fees wont cover expences.

How can bitcoin live without miners? Bitcoin is Dead and has no future.

Grin
423  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? on: January 30, 2016, 09:40:11 AM
Here is your concrete:

424  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? on: January 30, 2016, 08:59:59 AM

You have no reason to doubt these places are uncensored and you have completely no proof whatsoever that any of them is censored.

Please provide a strong proof or stop wasting my time.

Unless you are a troll who is trying to water down the important issues.

Again, If you did not accept the Fact 1, that those boards are censored, and there are down vote robots that hide every single post that challenges the official narrative, why should I waste my time in further discussion?

 I am not paid to convince people.

You have the freedom to fork back off to reddit, and you can Believe What You Want To Believe.
425  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? on: January 30, 2016, 08:39:11 AM


r/btc
r/bitcoin_uncensored


>credible source of information

Yes it happens, even to the brightest ones of us. It's not a shame to admit that one has been deceived. I know it looks really convincing. These many, credible looking accounts, with various achievement badges, on social media. A flood of well written posts, a carefully copy pasted arguments, followed by a fear and doubt inducing statements. A robotic -generated burst of down votes, and a slight burst of up votes for every post that needs to be legitimized. A "majority" couldn't be possibly wrong.
426  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? on: January 30, 2016, 08:27:11 AM
Current thread backup in case of censorship,

Tinfoil hat on?
Grin
427  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers) on: January 29, 2016, 10:55:21 PM
Shill activity intensifies, these are the major topics:

Classic vaporware - There is no alternative qualified team other than Core.

Hardfork to crash economy - The proposed block size increase hard fork is dangerous for many reasons. Large blocks will be spammed and full from the start.

Hardfork freeze coins - No matter the fork, the weak chain will be destroyed. This means the weak chain coins will become frozen, speculation will be impossible.

Hardfork cause loss of funds - If user pays during a hard fork, the payment can be reorganized and lead to the loss of funds.

Classic cannot VISA Scale - There is no proposal to reach 1000 transactions per second. Currently Bitcoin process 4 tps, Classic offers 8 tps.

Spam and 1MB cap are temporary - Because the "stress test" never ends, so will the blocks be forever full. Spam cannot be detected because wallets are anonymous.

0-confirmations are unsafe - 1% of blocks become orphaned, in this situation even 1-confirmed transaction can be reversed.

All miners mine 1MB now - There is no miner who has the balls to disrespect the Satoshi Nakamoto 1MB rule and mine a large block.

1MB +fee fast confirmation - With proper fees, transactions get confirmed without any delay
428  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: DagCoin: a cryptocurrency without blocks on: January 29, 2016, 10:54:04 PM
Is this project still alive?

No. It could be a part of altcoin
429  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? on: January 29, 2016, 10:51:14 PM
Reddit poster activity intensifies, these are the major topics:

Classic vaporware - There is no alternative qualified team other than Core.

Hardfork to crash economy - The proposed block size increase hard fork is dangerous for many reasons. Large blocks will be spammed and full from the start.

Hardfork freeze coins - No matter the fork, the weak chain will be destroyed. This means the weak chain coins will become frozen, speculation will be impossible.

Hardfork cause loss of funds - If user pays during a hard fork, the payment can be reorganized and lead to the loss of funds.

Classic cannot VISA Scale - There is no proposal to reach 1000 transactions per second. Currently Bitcoin process 4 tps, Classic offers 8 tps.

Spam and 1MB cap are temporary - Because the "stress test" never ends, so will the blocks be forever full. Spam cannot be detected because wallets are anonymous.

0-confirmations are unsafe - 1% of blocks become orphaned, in this situation even 1-confirmed transaction can be reversed.

All miners mine 1MB now - There is no miner who has the balls to disrespect the Satoshi Nakamoto 1MB rule and mine a large block.

1MB +fee fast confirmation - With proper fees, transactions get confirmed without any delay
430  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? on: January 29, 2016, 06:56:55 PM

If you would like to use TLSNotary to prove that your screenshot is genuine, PM me.  Smiley

Yes Grin
431  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers) on: January 29, 2016, 06:51:19 PM
WHAT U MEAN ´NO DEMAND'?!!

I DEMAND IT!!1

DEMoCRACY DEMANDs IT FFs!!! Angry Angry

I demand time travel machine.

Post written at 17.5.1983 at my typewriter.
432  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? on: January 29, 2016, 06:44:10 PM
Can't you really stay straight for an hour ?

Is a plenty of upvoted well-written posts by many distinct accounts on the social media what people believe nowadays?
433  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? on: January 29, 2016, 06:37:31 PM

all I have is facts
434  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? on: January 29, 2016, 06:18:52 PM
More please.

More of what?

435  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? on: January 29, 2016, 06:06:42 PM

Start with the arguments. Only then will you gain my respect.

Fact 1: r/btc is censored

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/
[citation needed]


436  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? on: January 29, 2016, 05:59:20 PM

Start with the arguments. Only then will you gain my respect.

Fact 1: r/btc is censored

 https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/
437  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Real value of Bitcoin in regards to other Crypto currencies on: January 29, 2016, 05:56:44 PM
We all know Bitcoin will not be the most dominant and strongest Crypto currency out there in the future. In every technology thus far, we have seen the
original pioneers and then the competition starts and eventually the original technology gets replaced by something more innovative or more popular.


Like Ethereum? Grin
438  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? on: January 29, 2016, 05:43:16 PM

The arguments provided above should be enough for anybody to abolish Bitcoin Core forever. But there is of course much, much, much more from last year.


Tell me more

439  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Wondering out loud: Which should Chinese miners support - Core, Classic or another? on: January 29, 2016, 05:36:33 PM
A zero fee guy and poor guy enter the thread

Both have no idea how Bitcoin actually work, yet for some reason they feel highly qualified on the subject.

And their goal is, to complain about the injustice that poor companies that can't afford the 1 cent fee are forced to use Dogecoin.
440  Other / Archival / Re: Do you think bitcoins will disapear or become unused? on: January 29, 2016, 05:19:03 PM
It's like a computer game, but played out in a real world.
Just like the wars.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!