Bitcoin Forum
September 24, 2024, 07:35:33 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 »
541  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers) on: January 22, 2016, 03:24:28 PM
ummm..
didnt satoshi disapear in 2010 and the 1mb block limit get implemented after he disapeared..??

If Satoshi Nakamoto comes here, and tells me to remove His 1MB limit, I will do it immediately.
542  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers) on: January 22, 2016, 03:03:31 PM

So the "current rules for Bitcoin" are set in stone unless the directors of the core repository say otherwise?
Do I have your position understood correctly?


Yes. It's the original rules introduced by Satoshi Nakamoto.

Satoshi Nakamoto introduced his 1MB limit to prevent the dust attack also known as the first "stress test".

If you disagree with Satoshi's rules, you're getting on a slippery slope.

It begins with a block size. Is there so much use? Who knows? Who cares?

Next the block time can be put into question. Do we need faster confirmations? But this affects the reward schedule itself. And so on.

In the end we have inflationary paradise no more different than the bailout-plagued system of today.
543  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers) on: January 22, 2016, 02:48:58 PM
In short:

Classic, XT, ... REKT
544  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers) on: January 22, 2016, 12:56:34 PM
the last one is right?

What about raise limit and clog Bitcoin with dust?

545  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT on: January 22, 2016, 12:53:38 PM
They think they raise the limit and crash system using blocks full of dust.

LOL
546  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers) on: January 22, 2016, 12:47:56 PM
you seem stressed. I wonder what you wanted to communicate with that double post.
547  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT on: January 22, 2016, 12:43:48 PM
and we thought that the XT train was lulzy...  Grin

the ride never ends Grin
548  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers) on: January 22, 2016, 12:31:19 PM
dear grandpa sgbett.

It must have been an amazing post. Sadly you're ignored.
549  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers) on: January 22, 2016, 12:26:48 PM

This is frightening.

Are you aware that invalid forks with the longest chain can and do happen and they are ignored because they don't follow consensus rules?

Are you aware that miners can continue hashing all they want and if the economic majority of nodes disagree with their chain being valid than it is ignored and those blocks are orphaned?

Do you understand that the economic majority of nodes holds the power to dictate what chain is valid and whether a chain is longer or not is secondary to the consensus rules of these nodes being followed?

What's actually frightening to me that these people actually think they can take over Bitcoin.

We've talked about it many times. They've spent countless funds to propaganda and whatnot. Their days are counted. We are well entrenched,
they can't do shit to damage the system. They don't have the balls to actually do 51% attack.
550  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / JOKE: Big blocks are like big dicks on: January 22, 2016, 12:18:02 PM
but take long to propagate  Grin Grin
551  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: End of the Road: Banks to suffer Bit-truptcy on: January 22, 2016, 11:55:48 AM
lol

we could house poor people in the vast offices Smiley
552  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: R3CEV uses elaborate hoax front Ethereum to claim non-existant blockchain test on: January 22, 2016, 08:42:59 AM
They forgot to test the bailouts again?

I wonder why the system keeps crashing. LOL
553  Other / Off-topic / Re: Do you still believe in bitcoin on: January 22, 2016, 08:40:22 AM
I actually don't believe in Bitcoin much. I believe in Satoshi Nakamoto.

Call me traditionalist, smallblocker, ...
554  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Hard Fork is not happening... on: January 22, 2016, 08:16:27 AM

I'd be lying if I don't find their posturing amusing though. They cry about censorship and feed off drama, meanwhile r/buttcoin makes them look like fools.

American rich kids.. They have nothing to lose. China gave them the middle finger, now they cry about it.
555  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Jamie Dimon is obsessed with Bitcoin and probably lurking on this forum on: January 22, 2016, 06:26:42 AM

He already invested in bitcoin startups and alike like Bitgold.

There are many elites that in public demonize bitcoin, but behind the curtain they all hoard it.

It's a very clever trick to even the odds and make sure you make money no matter what.

That's true they act like they want to crash it, but secretly hoard it, and of course next thing they gonna
do when the next crisis comes along they're gonna dump fiat to the face of general public (Zimbabwe dollar).

They're just scared shit less that general public will discover Bitcoin and it will go to moon sooner than expected.

It's inevitable.
556  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Jamie Dimon is obsessed with Bitcoin and probably lurking on this forum on: January 21, 2016, 09:02:03 PM

Bankers try to play both sides always , it's called hedging Cheesy
Maybe soros will hedge some pocket change too
557  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Jamie Dimon is obsessed with Bitcoin and probably lurking on this forum on: January 21, 2016, 08:32:29 PM
so what's with this Jamie Dimon guy.

I keep hearing him in the news discrediting Bitcoin.

Not just once or twice... He's made statements
how many times now?  4? 5? 6?

You don't see any major banking executives
talking much about Bitcoin.  Some of them
are investing in Bitcoin startups even.

This Dimon guys seems obsessed.  I bet
he reads Bitcointalk.



I don't read this everyday (I'm not Dimon)

But you are right. These banker types are often obsessed.
558  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT on: January 21, 2016, 08:24:22 PM

And even if this particular censorship instance is beneficial for us,  we still cannot use it. Because it can become a weapon against us in the future, so it would be hyporcritical to use it ourselves.



I know. I think we don't have much choice. These paid posters aren't going to simply disappear. I wish our systems survived until the Bitcoin gets a major boost from halving and also from the the fear of people at various stock markets and so on.

While there is a currency war between China and US we must be careful about every step we do.
559  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: So the bitcoin classic (2MB) coup was compromised? on: January 21, 2016, 08:14:23 PM
I'm not trying to be antagonistic, but there's a mechanism for handling consensus disputes built into the code.
While I can appreciate that there is a human element, it doesn't mean that changes should be vetoed by any minority that decides it's not on board.


What about we ignore your consensus?
560  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Washington Post: 'R.I.P. Bitcoin. It’s time to move on' on: January 21, 2016, 07:40:17 PM


Discredit to buy, large investors, they always use the same moves ..

and if they want to buy bitcoin also big investors .... something interesting is a bitcoin..

It keeps happening. I wonder what the tomorrow's news going to be.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!