If Facebook is really going to launch a coin in the near future, then the coin will become one of the new potential coins. Facebook coins can be very potential because Facebook is a great platform so the coins it creates will exceed its greatness because it has got great platform support. If this FB coin is present then the crypto currency competition will be more stringent and the market situation will become very crowded. Of course this will encourage the crypto currency to grow and develop. You can be sure if the crypto currency condition can last as minimal as this, then the crypto currency will stabilize quickly.

From the beginning of joining the crypto currency, I wasn't interested in following the hype. I think that following the hype there is no benefit. I wish I was more certain than hoping for the hype. Although this hype made a lot of money but I was not satisfied with following this hype. Yeah it's true that this crypto currency won't go anywhere. Crypto currencies will last as long as we still love crypto currencies. We must be more intelligent as crypto currency players. We have to be smart in analyzing crypto currencies. We cannot rely on news and information whose source is unclear.

Crypto currency is increasingly proven to provide benefits. Many large international companies then collaborate with crypto currency because indeed this crypto currency provides real benefits. By making crypto currencies as partners, big companies like Facebook and Samsung are increasingly easy to use to transact. I'm sure this big company will be more successful by collaborating with crypto currencies. I am sure, this company will get a market and greater public trust when cooperating with crypto currencies. Of course people will prefer smartphones and social media applications that are directly connected to crypto currencies than they have to go to other platforms that do not necessarily support their goal of using crypto currencies.

In my opinion, the decline in the price of crypto currencies after being registered in the exchange market was due to the poor strategy of the coin players in trading. As a wise crypto currency player, we must be smart in playing the price of crypto currencies. We must have the right strategy in regulating the supply and demand for crypto currencies. If we are smart in implementing the strategy, the price of crypto currency is in accordance with what we expect. I myself will not sell the coins that I have when I haven't reached the price I want. I have set the benchmark for how much I have to pay myself for trading and working in crypto currencies.

The belief that the eroded crypto currency has started to rise again. The recovery of the trust of crypto currencies is not as fast as lightning because everything requires a process. The number of traumatic and adverse events is very detrimental to the crypto currency because many investors are running away from this bad situation. This is a reasonable response. Now what you can do is change yourself. We can apply responsibility to ourselves. We should not take the rights of others who are not our rights. We must always do good and think positively. Following insurance is also an effort to restore confidence in the crypto currency quickly.

I am very happy to have people like you who have a high learning spirit. I am proud of you who did not immediately receive any suggestions given in this forum. You have shown that you believe in your own ability to do an analysis of coins that are good for investment land. I also decided to invest in several coins with various considerations. If I am like you who have a lot of capital, I will invest in some of these potential coins, including ethereum, ripple, litecoin, cardano, and binance. In my opinion these five coins have the potential to provide long-term benefits. This coin also proved to be able to compete with other coins on the market both in price and technology.

The condition of the bounty campaign can indeed be said to be a crisis because the market of coins from the bounty campaign is very difficult to survive and get good prices on the market. We cannot rely on life from income as a bounty campaign hunter. We have to look for another direction if indeed we want to always get money and move on. If we only rely on bounty campaigns then we will only starve. We should look for other jobs that are more guaranteed and have regular income. In the meantime we can make bounty campaigns a side job because the future of the bounty campaign cannot be ascertained.

In my opinion, the product is an important thing in a project. The existence of a product is a measure of the success of an ICO. Products that are ready to use are very important. ICO should have issued products that are ready to use. With ready-to-use products, ICO really works to deliver tangible benefits. Without the existence of a real product, the ICO cannot yet be considered a successful project. I think, something that works is something that can provide tangible benefits and those benefits can be felt by all parties. If ICO is present without issuing a product that is real then it is just like learning theory and not practicing it.

If there is news that says eth scam, the news is inconsequential and untrustworthy. We shouldn't say a coin is a scam if the coin isn't really a scam. As long as the coin is still in the market and is believed to have good movement then it shouldn't be said to be a scam. Besides that, we can see the technology carried by a coin. If the technology brought is useful and can be felt in a real way then we should not immediately believe that a coin is a scam product. We must be careful with the amount of news circulating in the community so that we can be wiser in doing business.

Every time is the right time to invest. Even now is the right time to invest especially because the price of crypto currencies is increasing and the market situation is getting better. It's a shame if we don't take advantage of the current good movements of crypto currencies. Currently the coins are very potential in providing benefits, namely bitcoin and eth. Both of these coins are increasingly moving. The trust of these two coins is increasing, so the trading of these two coins is increasingly crowded in the market. If you invest now, you may get double profits in the not too distant future.

Ripple is one of the potential coins and can compete in the future. Ripple's technology is also promising to make ripple worth investing. Ripple is a potential crypto currency coin at an affordable price so many people have ripple. But if this ripple will be the leader of the crypto currency replacing bitcoin then I feel that is not possible. Bitcoin is too deeply rooted and ingrained in building public trust so that bitcoin is difficult to overthrow. Moreover, there are still other altcoins who are ripple rivals in reaching the position as crypto currency leaders. Eth is the ripple's toughest rival if it wants to be the leader of crypto currencies because eth is also potential and the technology is great.

It is really what you say. All the decisions and steps we take depend on our hands. All goals and ways to achieve that goal are in our hands too. As a wise crypto currency player, it is fitting that we learn from many experiences that there is a lot of misleading information that makes us wrong in making decisions. We must believe in ourselves. With the abilities and experience we have, we must learn more independently in making every decision. We have to spend more time no matter as long as the decisions we make are the right decisions. If we have to analyze it deeply then make it part of our success journey because if we are lazy to do the analysis then the loss is more likely.

I think Litecoin hasn't died because Litecoin is still processing on the market. Litecoin is only in a critical state of price competition with other altcoins. This price competition that makes Litecoin lose its trust because it cannot compete for other altcoins. Technologically too, many litecoin competing coins have better technology so litecoin must be truly competent to compete with other potential altcoins. I am of the opinion that Litecoin still has the capacity to compete and become more alive again. If we love litecoin then we can actively trade litecoin so that we can immediately achieve a balance between litecoin offers and requests.

The ICO has not really died, except that the ICO has lost a lot of its beliefs. Now ICO still exists in finding investors to move their projects. But it cannot be denied if it is indeed difficult to get investors. The large number of ICO frauds has eroded investor confidence. The ICO has not died but the ICO is threatened to die. If ICO does not renew the system, it can become extinct as soon as possible. This system can be improved by making an institution that will handle the ICO including giving permission to the ICO that is feasible to run, trustworthy and truly responsible.

Honestly, lately I also find it difficult to find a good ICO to follow. The large number of frauds at the ICO greatly reduces the level of trust of the ICO. Maybe the ICO I participated in was one of the potential ICOs, although I couldn't confirm it. In my opinion, this is potential because it is included in the criteria in my analysis. But if you want to get a more potential ICO, you can do your own analysis by exploring the whitepaper from your ICO destination. Everyone has good ICO standards that are different. If I think an ICO is good, then you don't think it is good so you have to do your own analysis to be more satisfied.

The crypto currency is indeed out of balance. Many crypto currency projects are running but very few have made payments. This is not balanced and makes crypto currencies lose the trust of investors. Indeed there are many development teams that create crypto currencies but don't really think about their functions and benefits. Many coins that appear to be trash on the market because the benefits cannot be felt. This is what is dropping the crypto currency faster. If indeed the coin wants to stay in the market, it must be considered the real benefits. In addition, bounty campaign hunters can be paid with other more potential coins to avoid the price of coins falling due to large-scale sales.

Indeed we have the right to continue to follow the bounty campaign or stop following it. If indeed you feel you are not making a profit then I think you are not wrong if you will not join again with the bounty campaign. Indeed the projects that have not been registered and the coins that are not yet in the exchange market cannot be trusted. White books and development teams cannot be said to guarantee a project if the project is not really on the exchange platform. A project that requires investors must be ensured of success because failure will only lead to deep losses. A good project must be responsible and trusted. A good project is not just a promise.

That is right what you say. Security from bounty campaign hunters is indeed the first thing to look for. The security of fraudsters will ensure that all projects run smoothly, reliably, and responsibly. I myself will be very happy if there is a moderator or special team to handle the security of a project in this forum. This moderator or team has the duty to control and ensure that the ICO in this forum is truly real and not deceptive. If this can happen then the crypto currency will get better. Investor confidence will quickly rise. Good condition in the crypto currency will be more realized.

In my opinion, all three are important factors. All three play important roles. Without one of the developers, teams, and communities, the project will not run smoothly. All three play a role in the success of a project. If there is one that does not function optimally, the project will not be smooth and the chances are small to succeed. These three elements work together to form maximum achievement. All three must work together to support and complement each other. Cooperation between the three is very important to achieve a maximum result. One does not exist, the project won't work.

Indeed bounty campaign hunters have always been the scapegoat for every issue of price tokens that dump on the market. In my opinion, it is unfair because only bounty campaign hunters are considered to cause coin dumps on the market. It is true that bounty campaign hunters hold a percentage of coins that are not more than 5% so a dump is more likely caused by a 95% coin holder. We should not blame bounty campaign hunters because they are also very instrumental in making this project work well. They are the ones who have got many investors for the success of this project. As ICO developers, we should be smarter in achieving the causes that make this event happen.