|
We have reactivated the old DGEX user interface and account logins are again operational.
All other functions except for Withdrawals, History and Contact have been disabled. Existing orders have been cancelled and funds returned to the user accounts. Unfortunately, trading on DGEX is over for now.
If you have funds at DGEX, please log in and submit a withdrawal by September 1st 2015. Withdrawals are paid weekly, apart from NAS which we still have trouble with. If the NAS blockchain works, we expect to be eventually able to honor all NAS withdrawals also.
If you have any trouble with your account you can again use the contact page on the site to submit a ticket that will be responded to when possible.
|
|
|
|
I decided to drop in here once for quite a while, just to find the standard disinfo and exaggerations. People are not missing any funds and DGEX is not dead. All customer funds are available for withdrawals, which are currently performed about once a week. The DGEX exchange as business is not operating actively, but technically it's still possible to exchange NXT and FIMK if you happen to find a suitable price. Just make sure you access the site from http s://dgex.com appears dgex is dead.
I am getting no replies to a withdraw that was started last summer.
James
Did you forget something, such as the little fact that your withdrawal is NAS, the coin whose blockchain went down a few days after your withdrawal request and has been "resurrected" now a year later just a few weeks ago. It was not possible to transfer NAS for nearly a year. I'm wondering why a figure like you prefers to give a false impression publicly. Perhaps for egoistic reasons or maybe you still have some grudge against me for unknown reasons like you did on my forum where I brought up NXT for the 5000 active members. Go figure. Like replied to James privately, which he did not bother to mention here, NAS withdrawals will be handled when we have brought the NAS system on DGEX back up. |
|
|
|
FIMK passphrases will be made available again within about a week at most. Hi,weeks ago I took part in the FIMK ipo through DGEX escrow,when the ipo end I logged in DGEX and got a link to view my FIMK wallet password.
for security reasons I decided not to write down this password at that time,I just used the password once to enter my FIMK account and tried to deposit 10000 FIMK to DGEX.
after that DGEX shut down.today I found it re-open so I logged in but I could not find any link to view my FIMK password,now I don't know neither my FIMK account nor it's password,
I can even not check my deposit/withdraw/trade/FIMK invest history before the old site shut down.Am I the only one who got this problem?
my Account id is #6269
help me please!
|
|
|
|
Hello My dgex account number is:1434 . I made a withdrawal to a bitcoin address I have no access to right before the Dgex hack. From the last time your login went offline, the withdrawal had not been processed yet. Can you please cancel the withdrawal to prevent me from loosing the funds? I have also PM'D you. Thank you
Cancelled, thank you. |
|
|
|
|
Ok it seems to be gotten away. But out of interest we could still try what happens with Bitundo. Anyone would like to here explain a quick way how we sign and check a transaction with Windows Electrum?
I wouldn't like to send Bitundo a signed transaction that can be anything.
|
|
|
|
|
How come can blockchain.info be outdated right at the same time? Does that happen often?
|
|
|
|
Edit: Nevermind, I see that blockchain.info has an out of date database. Looking at blockr.io I see that the transaction actually already has 12 confirmations. It is too late to do anything about it.
Thank you for the info. We were about to use this; http://www.bitundo.com/ but to no avail now. |
|
|
|
We just confirmed your prior deposit, could you please cancel the new one  I was reading your message so that the amount was 13266, thus the confusion. Apologies for the hassle and delay. Or should I just make the deposit request again from dgex account with the amount that I had sent?
Please cancel the prior deposit request and make a new one. Couldn't find anywhere to cancel a pending deposit but I just made a new request with the amount that I sent previously. This is what the history page says: 2014-07-07 20:32:10 FIMK deposit PENDING 2014-07-05 15:58:44 FIMK deposit PENDING First one is the new request just made and last one is the old that wasn't credited before. |
|
|
|
Or should I just make the deposit request again from dgex account with the amount that I had sent?
Please cancel the prior deposit request and make a new one. |
|
|
|
Our database lists no pending deposit for 13266 FIMK. Please check your records, and delete and resubmit the deposit if the amount is wrong. Also sent Fimk to my dgex account: 13266 on 5th July. Used token but still nothing received on dgex account.
Did you create the token and submit the deposit page, as advised there in the deposit process? For all the missing deposits, if the deposit token confirmation on the DGEX site did not work when you tried, please try again, as the FIMK server software may not be up at all times. Thank you. I created the token and it did work. I already transfered Fimk to my accound a few times before and received the balance to my account. Only the latest transfer has not been credited. |
|
|
|
Why did you submit too many 10k deposits from your DGEX account and even one 100 000 FIM deposit? Please cancel the surplus deposits from your DGEX member account by clicking on the View pending orders button on your main screen, before we will be able to credit the rest. Problem don't solved  p.s. Recieve only 21001 FIMK + 70 000 FIMK = 91 001. But sent 123 698 FIMK: 17486704626142712822 03/07/2014 21:41:44 Ordinary payment 2'697 0.1 FIM-BLBF-97MH-UF2G-CUPRM 1440+ 10379494375765238218 03/07/2014 21:41:00 Ordinary payment 10'000 0.1 FIM-BLBF-97MH-UF2G-CUPRM 1440+ 16420838788612205362 03/07/2014 21:40:17 Ordinary payment 10'000 0.1 FIM-BLBF-97MH-UF2G-CUPRM 1440+ 16374770707810687640 03/07/2014 21:39:29 Ordinary payment 10'000 0.1 FIM-BLBF-97MH-UF2G-CUPRM 1440+ 15047109516258464353 03/07/2014 21:38:20 Ordinary payment 10'000 0.1 FIM-BLBF-97MH-UF2G-CUPRM 1440+ 7799265682815348600 03/07/2014 21:36:35 Ordinary payment 10'000 0.1 FIM-BLBF-97MH-UF2G-CUPRM 1440+ 2277919528881257219 03/07/2014 21:36:01 Ordinary payment 10'000 0.1 FIM-BLBF-97MH-UF2G-CUPRM 1440+ 14888284364741467206 03/07/2014 21:35:08 Ordinary payment 10'000 0.1 FIM-BLBF-97MH-UF2G-CUPRM 1440+ 2938044411493324148 03/07/2014 21:32:36 Ordinary payment 10'000 0.1 FIM-BLBF-97MH-UF2G-CUPRM 1440+ 6758901935998563109 03/07/2014 21:30:29 Ordinary payment 10'000 0.1 FIM-BLBF-97MH-UF2G-CUPRM 1440+ 18351287208714524999 03/07/2014 21:15:46 Ordinary payment 10'000 1 FIM-BLBF-97MH-UF2G-CUPRM 1440+ 5758139956709838391 03/07/2014 21:04:55 Ordinary payment 10'000 0.1 FIM-BLBF-97MH-UF2G-CUPRM 1440+ 6231829204384897959 03/07/2014 20:59:55 Ordinary payment 10'000 0.1 FIM-BLBF-97MH-UF2G-CUPRM 1440+ 3189052020804069058 03/07/2014 20:40:35 Ordinary payment 1'000 0.1 FIM-BLBF-97MH-UF2G-CUPRM 1440+ 12027189484140974503 03/07/2014 17:29:09 Ordinary payment 1 0.1 FIM-BLBF-97MH-UF2G-CUPRM 1440+ 123 698 - 91 001 = 32 697 FIMK losted (last 4 payments). |
|
|
|
Also sent Fimk to my dgex account: 13266 on 5th July. Used token but still nothing received on dgex account.
Did you create the token and submit the deposit page, as advised there in the deposit process? For all the missing deposits, if the deposit token confirmation on the DGEX site did not work when you tried, please try again, as the FIMK server software may not be up at all times. Thank you. |
|
|
|
Hey GCInc,
It could be me misinterpreting what got copied over from your communications to our developer board in regards to the 10% number.
Maybe they were just quoting that as the percentage that FIMK used on DGEX?
If it were your launch, what would you personally use? Closer to 2-4%?
No problem there, misunderstandings are common when intermediate parties are involved, just protecting the interest of DGEX customers and a public correction was the right way at this late point Yes 2% to 4% would be my recommendation based on the experience gained from the previous launches I have been following. |
|
|
|
DGEX mentioned that with their last launch, even with the 10% max per investor cap, the highest investor ended up only buying 6%. They will accept all funds for the entire launch and escrow them. If at the end of the pre-sale, one member has invested an amount that equals more than 10% of the total raised, the amount over 10% will be sent back to that owner. This was decided after much discussion with the DGEX team and I honestly don't personally think anyone will hit close to the 10% mark once all is said and done.
To correct any misunderstandings, I specifically advised Crypti to go lower than 10%. Just by luck and coincidence despite their 10% limit, the FIMK maximum escrow stake was <2% of total currency supply (6% of "IPO") which I consider appropriate. 10% maximum of total currency supply is stretching the limits and I must say I am somewhat disappointed to see that implemented. There just may be whales that are likely ruin the show long term, and it would be wise to prevent that possibility in the rules. |
|
|
|
Your withdrawal is from unknown IP address to unknown Bitcoin address. You need to please contact DGEX with a minimal deposit from one of your prior NXT accounts to confirm your account ownership and prevent unauthorized withdrawal. Thank you Anyone have the same result as me? I withdraw 0.94btc on 7th June 2014 4am(server time) from dgex, but I still have not receive my btc yet. I checked their website but I a post claiming he did not receive his btc https://nextcoin.org/index.php/topic,4857.msg44552.html#new My dgex account is 1445. If the admin of dgex see this message, please help to check. Thank you. |
|
|
|
Transparency is extremely important and the technology introduced by the NXT community is making giant leaps in making it eventually possible to technically provide full realtime transparency of operations, not the persons behind them which should in most instances be the secondary focus. DGEX is along with other individual actors working hard to materialize that goal. e-gold? Was a good e-currency E-gold was indeed the leader. The government goons shut it down because people used it anonymously to conduct business and fraud, just like they do now with Bitcoin. Times have changed, e-gold was unfortunately ahead of its time (not minding it was fully centralized). For the sake of some little substance towards transparency here are the DGEX main reserve accounts https://blockchain.info/address/1LNKq42Hx6nsWCyBsxKCDqdF3btBbufnQThttp://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=16386134630970163904 |
|
|
|
|
Good thread for all the black / white thinking authority lead masses.
There are reasons beyond an intent to scam to remain anonymous in cryptocurrency exchange operations.
Although I agree these are rare, but they do exist.
For me personally these reasons are related to being able to continue producing value for my e-currency customers, like I have done since 1999 believe it or not.
To be able to continue these activities and benefit the society in whole I'm going to keep both my integrity and anonymity intact. Fortunately there are people who judge people by their track record instead of their government issued id.
|
|
|
|
|
The token was successfully entered and deposit was now credited. Thanks for your patience, we try to make it somehow smoother in the next revamp of the DGEX web site.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
