Remind us again what the negotiations were supposed to do. Why did we bother to negotiate at all?

64Block_6hzwVCqmx6kvMG2NnxdcBG

I'd pretty much agree with this. However listening to one gay who escaped they apparently are systematically looking and finding gays and even they do not know how they are dong it - of course others will do just a well too and it is mainly to create terror but they also do seem to be trying to do a 'genocide' on gays.

from the story

The woman, identified as Andrew West,

it's a dude. How is this a hate crime?

Or he could ...ya know ...show the customary level of respect by hoisting our flag to half mast in a timely manner.

Took them all of 5 and a half hours to setup a homo-rainbow colored light show.

Was the flag too much to ask of this Muslim terrorist loving President?

Obviously, yes, it was ...and apparently you agree or did I get that wrong?

So the gun shop owner won't sell guns to those who might do harm to fellow patriots.
Who was Chris Kyle shot by?

Guy just painted a target on himself for lawsuits.

                                  

Witnesses have told Mississippi state investigators that an unarmed black man died after being kept in a chokehold by a police officer for more than 20 minutes and denied CPR, according to his family’s attorneys, who said an autopsy confirmed he was fatally strangled.


Read here

Did you notice that cops are too aggressive today?
Damn this is kept pretty quiet cause I live in Mississippi and this is the first I've heard of it. Hope it don't get swept under the rug.
Is this police brutality problem really not systemic?

And the leftist keep asking "why hysteria".

Salvador 4 - 4 Canada

I don't think it was as simple as that. Because the banks were not bailed out, many people lost their savings. The majority of the savers were not living in Iceland. So in effect, the money that the banks owed (to those savers) was already invested in Icelandic properties and Icelandic companies but those investments were paid for by other non-Icelandic Europeans.

Los Angeles 63 @ 79 San Antonio

64Block_6hzwVCqmx6kvMG2NnxdcBG

I live in a community where there are several "poly" communes- several sets of adults that are "religiously" married. They have several "legal" married couples within the group. They have children between them. often not between the legal married couples. Also- there are several BDSM "poly" farms here in Hawaii, that have some sort of hierarchy that only they themselves can really define.

What is interesting to me living here and seeing this is this- they are having a hard time negotiating the financial and legal obligations of their relationships. Some also have some kinds of religious beliefs that holds their communities together. I seem to see that most of the communities are no more or less successful than one man one woman marriages. They live on farms and co-own, well, the farm. Sometimes these communes break up and it is not healthy for the children or the adults regarding what happens next in courts.

Secular marriage as it is practiced in America, for about 100 years now, has nothing to do with procreation or religion- but rather, the rights the married has when a spouse becomes ill and can not make decisions for themselves, or the marriage has ended. The actual day to day living of marriage means nothing legally at all.

The idea that "one man one woman" is the "traditional" marriage is of course wrong- polygamist marriage far out dates our current secular definitions.

So my question is:

Should the government end the marriage thing as we know it?

Should we go to contractual agreements only- without the current "default" we have now?

It's funny how even some people on this site claim the superiority of the northern Italians over the southern ones. If this happened in some of the southern regions, the school would have burnt to the ground with the teachers in it.

Total time logged in: 14 minutes.