 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
You donks are so dumb. Let the price fall. There is massive PoS coin creation going on right now. The early miners who had the GPU miner at launch of this coin are making a killing.
The people managing their blocks are also making a killing  Mined from the start with 2 quads, staked early, made a killing too  i mine lots too... GPU miner maybe only 3x faster than CPU and was not at launch, you can watch the Difficulty in block explorer |
|
|
|
... I spent the past 48hrs looking into it exploring what is on offer ... Next up is the dev. I see initial commits from Rat4 on MASTER branch this is the guy which has bought a lot of tech into alts. All i can say regarding this matter is I am very reassured to know he is doing apart with this project (in whichever capacity ). You have no idea what you are talking about, do you? Seeing the audience here and who has been deployed in this project, it could be very possible that this is a rat4 action, I don't know whether the dev is rat4 or not, but from the commits you can't make this conclusion - except if you have no idea what you are talking about. I have not checked the source code, I have better things to do than to check blackcoin forks, but when I open the source repository web page I can see that this is a fork of rat4's blackcoin. So, if it is a fork of blackcoin than how on the earth could not be commits from rat4 the guy who maintain the blackcoin repository in the first place? Of course there are commits from rat4 - his blackcoin was forked. I understand you spent the past 48hrs "looking into" the source code, but do you understand at all what fork means and how the source code repository works? lmfao .. yes i do I have been around the block with alts many times built coins participated under various alt projects under various pseudonyms played with some progressive BC ideas and pushed some ideas co-authored 2 w.papers along with participation of independent peer reviews for unnamed alts.. Worked on anon mixer and coinjoin techniques. Multiple token rings <-- Hint to who I am. So yeah I do kinda know a little, just a little bit about spotting a very solid code base and novel approach to fixing Small spend DoS issue as this is one of the ways I believed its rat4 who is behind this as during another project which I was apart of he pointed out this vuln in my alt which needed correcting. Now low and behold its apart of this src code.. plus other hints and i picked up on. Who knows I maybe completely off the mark but regardless of true dev code is still very solid! Its my job to spot good strong code so I can clone it as ruthless as that sounds and use elements in my own works, if appropriate!.. Frankly, I don't care who you are, all I know, which should be clear to even junior software engineers that you had no idea what you are talking about regarding the commits of rat4. If you say so then I have no doubt that you are the most influential and accomplished software engineer since Satoshi Nakamoto disappeared from here - yet you don't know how the fucking source control works, which knowledge should be the material of a high school software development class. You still don't understand that the reason you can see rat4 commits because his software was forked, and therefore of course his fucking commits are in the fork. Now, this project is might rat4's project, as I said seeing the deployed support I wouldn't be surprised if it is, however from the fact that the master branch of the fork includes his commits you can't make this conclusion. That's all I said in my post which obviously you couldn't understand. Don't bother explaining its a lost cause lol Now just for sanity check reasons and spent exactly 50 seconds to check the commits of AXIOM. The last commit that has anything to do with the software was from rat4 on the 21 July - to the blackcoin repository. That was forked - without a line of addition. The AXIOM developer has added exactly 0 lines of code to rat4's blackcoin. Not even one line. Therefore, the young Satoshi who was banging on above what an expert he is, was checking for 48 hours rat4's blackcoin commits - and he made the conclusion the AXIOM code base is great :-))))) After all his "job to spot good strong code" LOL This is one of the most fucked up place of the planet, but this is one of the funniest shit I have ever seen on Bitcointalk :-))))))) SCAM!!!! LOL! It's not even a scam, it must be a surreal human experiment at it best :-)))) Even Bobsurplus' coins make more sense from technology viewpoint because lately Bob at least add some shiny features to his coins before he P&D the shit out of the coins, but this coin has added zero (0) line of code never mind new feature to the blackcoin source - it was forked, renamed and released without any additions. WTF? Hero and senior members support this coin, and all right, they want to make somehow some money, but are they aware of that this is a plain blackcoin fork without any modifications whatsoever or are they just here without knowing anything about how software development works? Anyway, it's funny sometimes in many ways, but mostly of course it's sad what is happening (fork after fork without any innovations) in digital currency in the last year. Uhm, are you a little bit retarded? Blackcoin is scrypt with ecsda sigs, axiom is RandMemHash with schnorr sigs,,,  some github tutorials here ;0 |
|
|
|
We expected guys like sockpuppet to show up after we updated. Naturally supports of other coins are going to be scared. Sock, the fixes we bring will be to the benefit of crypto as a whole.
Sigh......I'm not scared of anything. I'm not married to any coin and am generally holding at least a dozen different alts at any given moment. I'm pointing out legitimate concerns that anyone who is thinking critically should have. Sock, anyone who is critically thinking, knows that 99.5 percent of every single post on bitcointalk is motivated.... And that 99.5% of all coins are scams so it is advisable to stay skeptical and critical. If you want to believe or try to convince your followers that I am just threatened because POS 3.0 will make all of the current POS 2.0 coins dead and worthless, go right ahead. That's a pretty far fetched narrative though, and it seems to be an attempt at cultivating an us vs. them mentality, which is a useful tactic for getting current holders and supporters of the coin to not question anything. i think if this is true the thread is moderated. . . edit: and i see in your post history, a lot of talk about exploiting POS 2.0 mebbe you worry a little  |
|
|
|
This is how I see it. Right here the dev is basically saying that he doesn't believe the GPU miner is a big problem, but is responding to the community and will work on fixing it. I don't even understand how the devs can say definitely that the CPU mining power grossly outweighs GPU power. Maybe there is something I am not understanding here, but a hash is a hash is a hash. The only clue would be the IP address of the node that the block originated from, but you couldn't say definitively if that hash is coming from a CPU, GPU farm, or a botnet. A GPU farm could easily be using multiple IP addresses to hide their mining if they wanted to. If there is something I don't understand about the technical details here, please correct me because I am admittedly not a expert.
It doesn't matter to me. I don't have anything against GPU farms and ASICs, but why did the devs put the below statement in the ANN at launch then?
So centralize mining is bad and mining farms lead to poor coin distribution, so blah blah blah, Axiom is going to decentralize mining power because it's super important. Then, within days, a private GPU miner is released and in the hands of a small group of individuals, and Axiom developers think "Oh nothing wrong with this, let's carry on" until people bitch and moan about it. HUH!?!?! I don't care about a private group of individuals keeping a miner to themselves, I care about a developer claiming that centralized mining is the bane of crypto one day, and then not concerned in the slightest about threats to it the next. Not to mention the mere fact that a GPU miner was created so quickly shows the developers to be incompetent at best and blatant scam artists at worst.
And please, Axiom is so worried about "poor coin distribution" that they ninja launched in the middle of the night with front loaded rewards and the slowest syncing blockchain known to man. I don't care about ninja launches rewarding the lucky few who catch it early. I did and earned .3 BTC just by downloading the client, typing "setgenerate true -1" and letting it run for a few hours. So thanks for the easy $55 I guess. But hell, at least try to not insult the intelligence of everyone here by claiming you care about poor coin distribution when you launch a coin in this way.
The cherry on top of all this is the revolutionary POS 3.0 they are working on! So supposedly there are flaws in the current implementation of POS 2.0 which Axiom is going to fix. So not only is POW being exploited by GPUs, POS is being exploited as well!!! Did you not notice these flaws in previous POS 2.0 coins? If you did and they were such a big deal, why not fix them before launching the coin? Did you guys test anything for more than a day before launch?
So basically the Axiom devs admitted that they can exploit the mining of their coin but we just need to trust them that they aren't, and if anyone else out there has the knowledge to do so, it's not that big of a deal and they are working on fixing it.
the whitepaper they used said GPU would not be faster for cpu, back in thread now they fix... and if they see now POS 2.0 is broken in their coin why is this bad? you prefer to leave it broken and unfair? Many people know the tricks and some are easy, setting your clock ahead a minute or two and some only devs know. I hope they fix the POS 2.0 exploits for the good for all cryptos. |
|
|
|
This project looks like another scam to me
technical innovations are scam come ride the trading waves  |
|
|
|
top wallet keeps putting fake buy wall so he can dump at higher price  somebody wanted more coins accumulate and removed... |
|
|
|
Top wallet 62K  now 66k gone,, 40k withdrawn some 40ks |
|
|
|
We are here and working on updates!
You didn't take a day off did you? Naughty person!
We have been working and testing ways to hardfork and make the coin more GPU resistant, along with some major changes to POS 2.0 and it's security flaws.
More news is coming in daytime USA time!Good kill the greedy GPU miners! |
|
|
|
There are now 4 topwallets with 40k each.
Noob question: isn't this a bit dangerous? There could be a huge dump any minute then.
They are whales waiting for something much bigger, I think. I hear rumors of some great open source improvements all POS coins will want . . . |
|
|
|
it is obvious market manipulation whale places many buy orders and dumps on himself and gets cheap coins from others then moves back up i see him do this |
|
|
|
Now we go step to step to 100k. After 100k to 800k. Remember Crave))) cheap coins for smart investors  How many coins did Crave have? 1kk? This one has 10kk 653,918 CRAVE now the supply was higher at the pump... 900k now, 2m in a couple months, 10m in 5 years |
|
|
|
Bittrex fix u fkin charts m8  |
|
|
|
<Wolf`> Elbandi_: well, AxiomCrypto isn't an idiot! <Wolf`> I like that. <Wolf`> it won't work how I want it to <Wolf`> due to the fact index b is modified and index j is a pseudorandom lookup, the number of modifications ain't known <Wolf`> were it not modified in the second loop, however <Wolf`> I would simply be able to recompute the hash from the first if necessary <Wolf`> Cute! <Wolf`> I like it. From IRC |
|
|
|
Look at all the legendary, senior and hero members in this thread  yes and they think 3500 satoshi is too much... at this price its only 27 BTC marketcap, about $8,000 USD. This coin could easily 10x and still be fair price at $80,000 marketcap with continuing development. Look at vanillacoin, $200k+ ... |
|
|
|
So let me get this straight. I mined with my CPU for about 9 hours, and have been staking since then. I was only using about 30 watts, so only used .27 kilowatt/hours. So my 3 cent investment is now worth over $30.00 if I dumped? My math must be screwed up. That's insane. 30 watts? wow i think i used 800 You must mean 800 watt/hours. A CPU that used 800 watts would either be really powerful or old. I mean the whole PC |
|
|
|
So let me get this straight. I mined with my CPU for about 9 hours, and have been staking since then. I was only using about 30 watts, so only used .27 kilowatt/hours. So my 3 cent investment is now worth over $30.00 if I dumped? My math must be screwed up. That's insane. 30 watts? wow i think i used 800 |
|
|
|
|
WTB AXIOM paying .2 per 10k
|
|
|
|
|
