|
Based on it's OpenCL benchmarks it should be around 100MH/s for desktop HD4000 MHz speeds. However Intel has licensed Nvidia IP so I'm not sure what the actual MH rate will be. Any bitcoin miner with a 3570K, 3770K or IB notebook who could find out what the real world numbers are?
|
|
|
|
|
I'll buy the WD Blue 250GB.
|
|
|
|
|
When this amount of money/bitcoin is involved his best course of action is a lawsuit. It's even possible he would have to provide less identification than CX is asking for, or at the very least provide that information to a separate entity unlikely to divulge full ID details to CX, especially if he is just asking for the return of his BTC instead of currency.
|
|
|
|
|
Did the ToS say he can do whatever he wants with the advertisers funds? He says he sent them to charity(ies?). It's that part that makes me want to facepalm. It's also the point he refuses to discuss, wonder why?
|
|
|
|
I guess I need to be more blunt. MagicalTux, is it true that you are requesting more ID materials than Dwolla itself requires in the case of OP's frozen $100? I haven't seen MagicalTux explain why they require more ID (if true) than Dwolla itself for "verification" purposes.
Relevant comment by OP: Yes, it does. The funny thing is that they said they Dwolla is the company that made them require this new policy. I told them that with Dwolla, I just had to submit a utility bill (and no photo ID) and then MtGox changed their reason. They said since they do international business, they need more information.
|
|
|
|
If you don't like the service that Mt Gox is giving you, take your business elsewhere.
That's why the OP of https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=85938.0 wants his $100 back and is upset. MTGox tells him they need to verify in order to return the money since he used Dwolla. He sends in documentation that Dwolla would accept but MTGox asks for photo ID with unblurred id number, something the OP claims Dwolla doesn't require. MTGox hasn't addressed this main bone of contention. As of now he can't take his $100 anywhere. |
|
|
|
|
I haven't seen MagicalTux explain why they require more ID (if true) than Dwolla itself for "verification" purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
If that 50A/110A is true than the Lepa would still be the better unit given it's 80+ Gold rating. Just have to actually pay attention when using the molex/sata to PCIE power adapters.
|
|
|
|
|
Testing near max rated ambient temperatures.
|
|
|
|
|
Granted that they don't design specifically for Bitcoiners, would be tricky to power more than 8 high end GPUs without rigging up some special adapters to share the 2 rails set aside for CPU+Mobo.
But I'd want a Jonny Guru review of any single rail 1600W option, just to be sure it would hot box at 80+ Gold.
|
|
|
|
|
Complaining about being multi-rail? Did you see it's efficiency? And it's hot box results?
Quote from the Jonny Guru review "Days like this are why I love reviewing power supplies. I mean, how could I not? No popping MOSFETs in the load testers this time, just lots and lots of heat producing power. By the time this was over, I felt like I was hanging out in my furnace room. And really... what could be more awesome than this unit has been so far than to see it still being that awesome at forty three degrees? Yes, folks, it did full power at three degrees over the rated temp spec. "
|
|
|
|
|
I'd suggest a 850-900W unit, just not comfortable with edging too close to the maximum rating. Besides running at max load can knock a few percent off efficiency.
|
|
|
|
|
Just one of the many things that can happen when you ask a crappy unit to pull close to it's "rated" wattage. Just be thankful it didn't catch fire.
A component has been stressed and is now vibrating, I don't think it's worth the danger of opening it up and trying to secure the rogue part(s). Best to get a better PSU.
|
|
|
|
|
850-900W quality unit, 1000-1100W if an "OK" unit. Probably would want a single rail unit as you'll need quite a few molex/sata to PCIE power adapters.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, one reaction a deceptive individual can have to being caught is to crank up the con meter to over 9000.
|
|
|
|
|
Having multiple rails to limit the max amps any one rail provides is actually part of the ATX spec. However, with multiple rails there is the possibility of overloading a rail even though the full power supply capacity isn't near capacity. Having a single rail is simpler for the user and cheaper to implement. A good multi-rail unit with well marked/connected cables has the potential to be more efficient/clean than a single rail under full load.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
