|
Shady scam attempts. Wonder why people are replying to it so casually instead of having this user negative tagged. Op are you willing to escrow funds? In case you run away? How will you choose the winner? What's the max participants you are accepting? Show me the funds to pay the winner? Better give convincing answers to the above questions or we can assume you're trying to scam which can result in a negative feedback.
|
|
|
|
|
Star wars :? Not sure where the bets are available yet. I will definitely bet on Star wars, no matter the odds. Mad max would be the second closest. Doubt DICAPRIO will win this one. It's just the unwanted hype because he has done better roles in the past, worth an Oscar but he didn't get fuck all. Op if you could link the website where you found the bets, that would be useful.
|
|
|
|
|
You want a bounty to stand up for a good cause?Guess what? You're wasting time here.
|
|
|
|
|
You do know right selling of such accounts can lead to further scams? The buyer might use your trades and rep to scan some at LBC. It has happened in the past and all the transactions are irreversible. Don't sell such accounts. Some might actually need it,but most like the newbie above will definitely buy it for scams. Moreover, I have reported few LBC account sells in the past and their teams have nicely banned them for permanent.
|
|
|
|
|
Not a sin for someone with - 8 negative trusts from the DT. I mean what could be worst than scamming people or promoting it? As far as gambling is concerned, no God ever said don't gamble. Neither Bible mentions it. That should be convincing.
|
|
|
|
enroll to the campaign
Xotika.TV username: quentincole32
Bitcointalk username: quentincole32
Bitcointalk UID: 15177
Starting Post Count (including this post): 427
Forum rank before entry: Senior Member
Did you read the terms & conditions thoroughly: Yes sure
Thankyou
Very sure ? Like promise ? I don't see any purple color signature neither the avatar changes.Oh maybe I'm color blind. |
|
|
|
Bump . Is there a point of starting a scam accusation here ?
Have Pm'd EcuaMobi to look into the matter.He will most likely flag him red.Wait for his response. |
|
|
|
This is both unnecesary and unhelpful, though it is fairly easy to not notice the date as I have done it myself before, but these sorts of posts and all of the following will likely be removed if the bump was deemed unnecesary or spam.
See,you deleted all the bumps in that thread,some fool made a new account just to bump it again which is followed by comment from another member. |
|
|
|
necroing a thread is allowed as long as you have a good reason for it (up to the mods to decide if it's good or not).
IMO the guy who necroed that thread you linked are just shitposting.
Exactly! Its started by a newbie and followed by other lower ranks ,after which the spam continues.As far as newbies are concerned,I can understand but even Senior Members posting without checking the dates is clearly spamming. |
|
|
|
Recently,I've been seeing a lot of newbies trying to resurrect dead threads obviously for post count but what really pisses me off is the experienced members are supporting it,definitely for signature campaigns.Some are actually posting new replies to it without noticing the dates and the fact that OP stopped replying.I came across few topics today ,this is the latest one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1240995.80 (surprised even Full Members and Senior Members are still replying).Any solution ? |
|
|
|
|
Would you mind posting only the details but the links? I know the odds can be attractive but there is a reason for that,very very less chances of winning.Anyhow risking 0.02 is not a big deal.
|
|
|
|
1. The algorithm for selecting the winner in each should be a random algorithm based only on the bitcoin addresses participating.
I believe that it will very important, that this algorithm is public, so everyone can test that the draw is not tampered with in any way. But also must be so complex that nobody can predict any outcomes.
This part I think I have already covered with an algorithm that I have worked on and tested over the past couple of months.
Hey are you writing the algorithm from scratch ? I can test the efficiency of the algorithm also MTTF (Mean Time To Failure),just so you can check how reliable it is.I can do this for free.Pm me,just in case. |
|
|
|
So how our system works?
1. You and other 25 (as example) members buy a lottery ticket that costs 0.01 BTC
2. When countdown timer stops, system automaticlly and randomly picks half of lottery players
3. All the picked members will receive x2 of the ticket price (in our example price was 0.01, so you get back 0.02, if the system picked you as well)
Is there a way to find out if all these members are legit users or just random bots to boost up the competition ?How are you choosing the random winners ? |
|
|
|
@bold: I don't think this proves much as many other campaign managers have done the same in the past
As far as I know ,they all have been neg'd,there are a few exceptions but recently DT members are quite serious about it.You could see doublecoin or whatever ,its running since a month with negative to all the participants. Defending your owner is just because they have known the owner
Not quite well...from the comments made by yahoo ,he seems extra supportive of the owner and the campaign,he mentions it,that he had done his part of research before becoming the manager. but this no way proves that "yahoo" is equally responsible for the scam. It's just like when one works in a company, the person has a trust built for the company and dismisses any speculation of it being a fraud one until PROVEN that the website/company is FRAUD.
Take example of xyz financial scheme company.Assume the company runs away with people's investment.The people who lost their funds won't care if you're the manager or just a level 1 employee as long as you have the company's name associated to you,you should be equally blamed. |
|
|
|
|
Having issues login in and claiming the faucet as well.After authenticating the capctcha I get this error
Fuacet claim error
auth_id must be an integer
Looks like some programming bug (type conversion mostly)
|
|
|
|
|
Yo , he tried to scam me as well.Mind opening a thread in Scam accusations ? I will post the proof there,he first insisted he doesn't have an alt but he does have an alt around .Open a scam accusation.
|
|
|
|
|
Lately, I have been thinking of something similar as well. Gambling is banned in my country (you should consider that as well before proceeding). How much funding you're willing to sponsor? You could implement a real good peer to peer poker or monopoly game with gambling.
|
|
|
|
|
What stats exactly you're looking for? A month, a day, a year? I can't really keep a track of stats for more that 2 months but here's my stats since June 1,2016.
Sports bets : 0.10 invested 10 matches :won 6 lost 4 : profit :0.04
Dice games :0.05 invested :profit made :0.01
Casino : 0.02 invested :profit made :void
Overall, I'm not doing too bad I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
It would be nicer of you would keep the list in alphabetically sorted order. Much easy to navigate. I think tomatocage had maintained the same order.
|
|
|
|
|
Each time you lose, you gain the upperhand. If you lose 1 bitcoins, you bet with 2. If you win you will have 1 bitcoin in profit. This would work even with high house edge
Could you try explaining the circumstances if he lose while betting with 2 bitcoins? Does't it depend on your probability(odds) selection weather you're more likely to win or lose? I know in this case is x2 which is 50% ,correct? I doubt you can be sure if the next roll with 2 bitcoins will work in your favor (could or could not).
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
