Winning # is 42
Isn't that always the winning number? The winning number to life, the universe, everything? eh, didn't even cross my mind. |
|
|
|
|
Ah, almost forgot about this since BTC-MINING moved to BTCT.co
I've rolled a number between 1 & 72 on Random.org
Winning # is 42
|
|
|
|
|
rwcWxqsUxtzGJSXCbqf7rDjqHW61fxSirN
|
|
|
|
|
S.MPOE - February 2013
Per share
979.88886371 BTC / 1'000'000'000 S.MPOE = 0.00000097988886371 BTC
5% Fee
0.00000097988886371 * 95% = 0.0000009308944205245 BTC
Rounded up
0.00000094 BTC
|
|
|
|
You don't need to debate the feedback, it's your website and you can do whatever you want with it. But you asked for critique so we are giving you critique. You have a great tool, but it looks poor. It is even worse now with the blue gradient. This is what I think of when I see your webpage: http://wondertonic.tumblr.com/post/550624342/the-geocities-izerEh, I disagree on that. I didn't technically ask for critique, I was just sharing the tool. It was not made to look pretty, just functional with basic display. |
|
|
|
We have to wait to find out anyway  One thing I have not mentioned about asicminer is that they are supposed to pay out only till the IPO price, which makes this a highly questionable investment imo. I cannot fathom why anybody would buy this considering they do nothing else than mining. Only pay till IPO price? That's incorrect. They pay IPO price in full first. Then shares pay 1/400000 of profits each as supposed. They just guarantee to pay IPO price before taking any profit for themselves for the shares they've kept for themselves. no look again they pay don't pay dividends! not really, they pay IPO price in full... after that your holding on the a stock that wont pay dividends... Seriously? Where did everyone take that info? reading their thread.... your right they will need to slipt any "profit" they make but they can take a salary and always choose to invest the profits back in and expand the company, in which case their will never be any dividends. Oh, that sort of concern. Many seems to have it for many things. I've never seen this occur at all however. The biggest concern would be why would the pay anything all all when they could have just ran away with all the funds? If you don't trust the party, don't buy. I suspect this is not a concern for anyone who purchased. |
|
|
|
We have to wait to find out anyway One thing I have not mentioned about asicminer is that they are supposed to pay out only till the IPO price, which makes this a highly questionable investment imo. I cannot fathom why anybody would buy this considering they do nothing else than mining. Only pay till IPO price? That's incorrect. They pay IPO price in full first. Then shares pay 1/400000 of profits each as supposed. They just guarantee to pay IPO price before taking any profit for themselves for the shares they've kept for themselves. no look again they pay don't pay dividends! not really, they pay IPO price in full... after that your holding on the a stock that wont pay dividends... Seriously? Where did everyone take that info? Risk Compensation for Investors To further compensate the risks of
investors, we give investors following privileges.
You Break Even First We (Bitfountain) will not take any
net profits from mining or device sales until the investors (ASICMINER) break
even against the IPO price (0.1 BTC per share). It means that each share of
ASICMINER will first have 1/x of the total net revenues as dividends, in which
x equals to the total number of ASICMINER shares in circulation, and have
1/400,000 after the principals of the investors are paid out.
|
|
|
|
|
I guess that's the same issue as everything else. Based on trust.
I mean, anyone who bought ASICMINER to start with only had some vague promise of ASICs for sending Bitcoins to China.
|
|
|
|
We have to wait to find out anyway One thing I have not mentioned about asicminer is that they are supposed to pay out only till the IPO price, which makes this a highly questionable investment imo. I cannot fathom why anybody would buy this considering they do nothing else than mining. Only pay till IPO price? That's incorrect. They pay IPO price in full first. Then shares pay 1/400000 of profits each as supposed. They just guarantee to pay IPO price before taking any profit for themselves for the shares they've kept for themselves. |
|
|
|
|
While I think the blocksize current limit is acceptable for the foreseeable future, I believe if Bitcoin gets any kind of adoption, the increased value of BTC coupled with the transaction volume will require higher limits if we are not to limit Bitcoins to large transactions only, that is, if Bitcoin ever makes it to that point.
For now, it should be sufficient as is for a few years at minimum.
|
|
|
|
It hadn't been working for quite some time when I created mine. Flash tends to crash randomly on me which can be an issue. I've had this script running non-stop for up to 2 days without any issues. @ OP: can you please enable Firefox?
Yes, I've added multiple audio formats. Firefox should now work. nice!
small suggesion: the gray static background is annoying. makes it look like something from the nineties. can you change to a more gloossy look? or at least use a solid color.
I'm pretty sure in the 90s they went from text on white background to solid color, mostly. Noise textures are common nowadays, although usually not in gray with more details added to the page hiding most of the background. It's usually more elegant with a more complex design. I've added a gradient to reduce the dullness of the noise texture a bit. |
|
|
|
|
Added more shares on the market, as well as updating the MPEx receipt to prove ownership.
|
|
|
|
OP: nice one, thank you!  Thanks. I kept tweaking at it a bit. it is near perfect, but, if I may suggest, a option for different sounds depending if the price goes up or down would also be quite cool, just an idea ... have a good day! Ask an you shall receive! |
|
|
|
|
We're not issuing any more shares on the market currently. We're just keeping the shares alive.
|
|
|
|
|
RG wasn't making any. The finances for the last few months he was around are unkown.
|
|
|
|
|
Aye, I don't know what they each do exactly, but they're usually not cross compatible for signatures.
|
|
|
|
|
Promise to buy back, no bitbonds bought, we get 40 mhash/11 BTC. Completely separate deal.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, it was not, He sent his signature the day before we got delisted I think.
We now have all holders confirmed and moved to BTCT.co
|
|
|
|
|
Shares have been transferred. We're missing 1 individual to sign/show himself.
|
|
|
|
I'll match watertech's winning bid and pay if that's an option.
Many proposed. I'll probably put these back for auction if he doesn't pay within a week. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
