On the other hand, Paul, I had received two payments, one confirmed and one conflicted, from my MN in V2000 when I have updated my controller wallet to v2010. Just for info.

I have lot of problems after editing the darknet.conf with the

:wq (pushed simultaneously, one after another, first : then wq???) I have tried some combinations but due the server lag, or my imcopetency or another thing I has been unable to record my changes.

Then I have tried to stop the scrypt execution when the config file is opened. I have corrected it manually with nano darknet.conf in the .darknet directory and checked changes have been saved. All seems to be ok, ./darknetd, server started, then ./darknet-cli, but when the blockchain finish to load, i have this:

Version seems to be correct but blocks seems to be stucked in 259200. Is this normal or the way I have updated the server doesn't work??

Thanks

Minting like crazy and receiving the first payment from v2.0.0.0 Paul's MN now. Seems to work fine. Thank's dev 

I also like that idea, and it's only a 0.14 % of the total supply, so no influence in price expected.

Showing pow blocks, maybe it's following a v1 fork???

For the moment, wait to the next version to solve the comm problem happened with 2.0.0.0

The only way to not fail it's not try it. I think that everyone involved in this coin from its early stage know that you were trying to get a new high to the Dashcoin scheme, and it would have its risk (first in something is always a risk, being this to land a rocket or to make the first POS wallet in the last bitcoin protocol). Big wallets in Bitrex are (unfortunately) not dumping so it's clear that almost everyone knows your honestity, professionality and work. Let's hope we can have that wallet working as soon as possible, if any testnet windows version can be run to help, don't hesitate to ask.

LYRA2REV2 is highly influenced for the number of MONA and VERT found in a period of time. I'm mining in multialgo and this algo gets a good amount of time, and in the long run seems to be quite profitable. The only algo I have found real problems in zpool is myr-gr, SAFRON has been looking for a blake block for hours in the past and this has made a good amount of hash being inneficiently used. But in the long run, payments are quite constant and similar to other forums, with the advantage of its internal change rate, that allows to be paid in coins that are in an acumm state and sold it with 2x, 3x or more benefit. Yes, sometimes it doesn't happen and the coin never evolve from the shitcoin state, but that's a inherent risk in trading algos.
Crackfoo, Safron blockchain seems not to have this problem anymore, can you confirm this to include it again in the round robin?
Thanks.

I'm trying to resync using this conf file:


as recommended before in the tread. But I'm connected to Darknet but after waiting for 15 minutes no block have been synced. Any ideas???

Thanks.

Ok, I know that it has no relation with the hosting, with the wallet itself instead. But I was wondering if maybe could be something we could do.

Thanks

Hi Paul,

I know there is some problems with the POS transition. Two of my MN seems to be stucked at block 259200 but shows no errors, but the third one show this message

Is there something we can do to solve this? Reinstall the update or something?

Thanks

Hi Crackfoo,

If I'm correct Dnet has finished its POW at height 259200. Please, check it and finish its mining if needed.

Thanks

You were totally correct, everything seems to be working very fine now. Time to wait for a really smooth pass to POS.

Wallet synced ok, MN's synced ok, but I haven't received last payment from zpool's wallet, maybe it's only a matter of wallet syncing but I'm a bit concerned about it.
On the other hand, havr you see volume and order book in Bittrex? Looks really promising.

DNET seems to be mining only orphans. Related with the wallet update???

Hi Paul,

Now that DNET is going to pass to POS phase and well, I hope to the moon and so on I'm a bit concerned about MN's security. Is there something we should know or we can follow the instructions of some of the (very good) DASH MN's security setup available out there???

Thanks.

Before ask for entering c-cex maybe you should read the last posts of the Cryptojacks (CJ) thread...

Salute

It's any of you having problems with difficulty settings?. I'm using a slightly modified version of JK scrypt and everything seems to work fine except initial diff adjustment(,d=value), and not sure it's a problem with my scrypt modification or with the pool.

Now I'm working ok in mine1.zpool.com. Yesterday I received blocks from it but although the computer was hashing the zpool web didn't show any hashing from my wallet. If I try to connect to mine.zpool.com I received no blocks from the stratum in lyra2r2 and x11evo at least.

Same problem here, with lyra2v2 and x11evo. Both working in mine1. Don't test in mine2, sorry. In both algos, apparently no block received from server (or no connection)