Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 03:57:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 ... 206 »
41  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 01, 2019, 06:03:26 AM
BSV is the Bitcoin that hews closest to the original Bitcoin protocol design.

 I see special people on Twitter quoting this all the time.

 Just because it's in some marketting blurb for a shitcoin does not make it a fact. BSV is pure crystalized shit. BCH is distilled shit. End of story.

 There is only BTC.

 A 51% attack on either BSV or BCH is utterly trivial to the truly motivated.
42  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 01, 2019, 05:50:29 AM
if you've minted a Bitcoin block in 2012 and did not loose it to all the scams and possibilities until now a golden doorstopper can be yours!  Grin

Yeah, but it's Gold though. Who needs that crap ?
43  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: June 30, 2019, 09:58:03 PM
Stolfi had some logical points.

 Whatever happened to that guy ? His postings were always too crazy and conspiratorial to take him seriously. Sort of dropped off at some point and haven't heard much from him.
44  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: June 30, 2019, 07:33:21 PM
we love it when the emotional banned twitter trolls come over here with their already demonstrated lack of self-control.

 When a well-documented blue-checkmarked whorish woman, that preys off the gaming community, starts involving themselves with antifa, that's where I start becoming surly. The country is going to shit real fast. Twitter tacitly supports antifa, so, yeah, fuck Commiefornia.

 The Calvin Ayre/Craig S Wright shitshow on Twitter is some of the best entertainment out there. Blocked by Calvin, and of course Craig was nuked off Twitter. Following the deposition on Twitter, Friday, was great. I liked the part where Craig S Wright threw the paper in the air and was threatened with handcuffs.

 What a complete wanker.
45  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: June 30, 2019, 04:59:26 PM
Fucking 7 day Twitter timeout for calling some talentless blue-checkmark whore a “talentless whore”. Nice to see $10,000 again. When $20,000 ? Guess I’ll hang out here for a bit. Have been having a blast on Twitter trolling the ever loving crap out of BCH and BSV supporters.

#hodl

46  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: April 09, 2019, 03:32:50 PM
fuck Craig

Craig S. Wright is a fraud.
47  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Lightning Network Discussion Thread on: August 11, 2018, 06:32:39 PM
Day 28.

Channel balances were being sucked dry, pretty quickly, at the low rates I was offering.

Reset to default funding values.

"If you want access to my liquidity and routing, you're going to fucking pay for it. Goddamnit."

            "base_fee_msat": "1000",
            "fee_per_mil": "10",
            "fee_rate": 0.00001
48  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Lightning Network Discussion Thread on: August 08, 2018, 02:23:50 PM
Day 25.

2018-08-08 08:52:16.537 [INF] ATPL: Processing new external signal
2018-08-08 08:52:16.537 [INF] ATPL: Triggering attachment directive dispatch, total_funds=0.23550447 BTC
2018-08-08 08:52:16.537 [INF] ATPL: No eligible candidates to connect to

---

    "num_pending_channels": 0,
    "num_active_channels": 172,
    "num_peers": 176

---

    "day_fee_sum": "2",
    "week_fee_sum": "25",
    "month_fee_sum": "40"

49  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Lightning Network Discussion Thread on: August 06, 2018, 04:35:36 PM
Day 23.

Total funding provided is ~2BTC or ~2% of current network value.

Cut fees in half from default values.

  "version": 160200,
  "subversion": "/Satoshi:0.16.2/",
  "protocolversion": 70015,
  "localservices": "000000000000040d",
  "localrelay": true,
  "timeoffset": 0,
  "networkactive": true,
  "connections": 121,
 
---

    "num_pending_channels": 0,
    "num_active_channels": 178,
    "num_peers": 184

---

[Bitcoin]
bitcoin.active=1
bitcoin.basefee=500
bitcoin.feerate=5
bitcoin.minhtlc=18
bitcoin.timelockdelta=18

---

    "day_fee_sum": "8",
    "week_fee_sum": "22",
    "month_fee_sum": "37"


50  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Lightning Network Discussion Thread on: August 01, 2018, 12:09:51 AM
So how do you see yourself turning that into a profit.

Not in this for the profit at the moment.

It's just a really neato technology to help cultivate right now.

Sorta how like when I got into Bitcoin mining back in the day. I never imagined it would have paid off how it ultimately did. Was "operating at a loss" for years.

Same thing here.

In it for the technology and intellectual stimulation right now.

If it pays off, great. If not, no big loss, ultimately, but I had a lot of fun and learned a lot of new things in the process.
51  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Lightning Network Discussion Thread on: July 31, 2018, 02:40:57 PM
Day 17.

Nothing significant to report.

Lowered fees from default levels of 1000 / 10 to 975 / 5.

Total node liquidity provided approximately 2 BTC. Staying firm at committing to at least 0.01 BTC per established channel.

    "num_pending_channels": 1,
    "num_active_channels": 172,
    "num_peers": 176,

---

    "day_fee_sum": "0",
    "week_fee_sum": "8",
    "month_fee_sum": "15"

---

  "version": 160100,
  "subversion": "/Satoshi:0.16.1/",
  "protocolversion": 70015,
  "localservices": "000000000000040d",
  "localrelay": true,
  "timeoffset": 0,
  "networkactive": true,
  "connections": 150


52  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Lightning Network Discussion Thread on: July 29, 2018, 01:31:46 PM
I mentioned this issue yesterday Wink

My bad. Sorry about that. Didn't see it buried in the hyperlink text, that I obviously did not click on and read  Undecided

Morning of Day 15.

Autopilot kinda went nutty on me for a bit late last night but seemed to recover. Funded a couple more manual channels. Closed out two zombie nodes as per advice in BitCryptex's link.

Autopilot has now ended it's latest funding run and node is chugging along. Updated to latest LND via github repo last night.

Tried to work out some issues with Anon136 last night, not being able to get his eclair wallet to connect to my node, to no avail. Proper bits are being advertised on my end. Inexplicable.

Checked out some of the channel funding costs to establish all the routes I have created so far. I'm guestimating total channel fees thus far are approximately 90,000-100,000 sat.

Going to take quite some time to recover those fees.

    "day_fee_sum": "2",
    "week_fee_sum": "9",
    "month_fee_sum": "15"

---

    "num_pending_channels": 7,
    "num_active_channels": 175,
    "num_peers": 209,
    "version": "0.4.2-beta commit=92b0b10dc75de87be3a9f895c8dfc5a84a2aec7a"


EDIT: Installed ntop and starting to keep tabs on bandwidth for the bitcoind/lnd node.

  "version": 160100,
  "subversion": "/Satoshi:0.16.1/",
  "protocolversion": 70015,
  "localservices": "000000000000040d",
  "localrelay": true,
  "timeoffset": 0,
  "networkactive": true,
  "connections": 142


53  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Lightning Network Discussion Thread on: July 29, 2018, 09:21:51 AM
https://medium.com/@robban_69827/lightning-network-routing-fud-and-zombies-776b8238e66b
54  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Lightning Network Discussion Thread on: July 29, 2018, 01:28:26 AM
1000 sats

Inexplicable. Plenty of routing info for that low of an amount.
55  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Lightning Network Discussion Thread on: July 29, 2018, 01:09:31 AM
Could you tell us how much you have spent so far on the transaction fees? Opening over 170 channels must have been expensive.

I'm not sure how to find that information out Sad

I know it's a non-trivial amount, and hoping I recover the channel open fees in a couple months at this rate  Undecided

Interesting. shitcoin.com just closed all their channels. Removing 42 BTC of liquidity from the network.
Confirmed inability to pay lightning.spin and this is the first time I have been unable.

Curious. I have a 0.01 BTC route to lightningspin.com.

How much were you trying to spend ?
56  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Lightning Network Discussion Thread on: July 28, 2018, 05:45:54 PM
Day Fourteen.

After trading Tweets with Alex Bosworth on Twitter, I reset my fees to default levels. It's important to charge enough fees to pay for channel rebalance operations in the future.

Autopilot was loaded with an additional 1BTC, and has been funding additional channels over the last 24 hours since shitcoin.com dropped out.

Average channel size is 0.01 BTC.

lnd.conf

[Bitcoin]
bitcoin.basefee=1000
bitcoin.feerate=10

---

    "day_fee_sum": "0",
    "week_fee_sum": "7",
    "month_fee_sum": "12"

---

    "num_pending_channels": 5,
    "num_active_channels": 170,
    "num_peers": 176,
57  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Lightning Network Discussion Thread on: July 27, 2018, 09:26:25 AM
https://1ml.com/node/036b32ac6acf6d178f47c2139b7327ab85bd3d5f5c40681a9a48109ea21f53e1e5/history

Interesting. shitcoin.com just closed all their channels. Removing 42 BTC of liquidity from the network.

EDIT:

Day Thirteen.

shitcoin.com's influence has been entirely removed from the network.

    "day_fee_sum": "3",
    "week_fee_sum": "10",
    "month_fee_sum": "12"
---
    "num_pending_channels": 1,
    "num_active_channels": 93,
    "num_peers": 99,


EDIT2: https://medium.com/andreas-tries-blockchain/bitcoin-lightning-network-4-what-happens-when-you-close-half-of-the-lightning-network-b25b330dfad2
58  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Lightning Network Discussion Thread on: July 26, 2018, 02:02:09 PM
Day Twelve. Total node capacity over 1BTC. Average channel capacity approximately 0.01 BTC.
   
    "day_fee_sum": "0",
    "week_fee_sum": "8",
    "month_fee_sum": "8"
---
    "num_pending_channels": 2,
    "num_active_channels": 93,
    "num_peers": 97,


Hey now. My question was different.

Nothing against you, friend. Was just curious why the poster was regurgitating my question. Odd.
59  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Lightning Network Discussion Thread on: July 25, 2018, 10:14:46 PM
How is it possible to open a channel with no cost ?
I thought there was a cost to checkpoint the channel-open with the BTC blockchain.
this is logical idea!?

Deja vu.

Does anyone know of a node that will open a channel with you for no cost?
How is it possible to open a channel with no cost ?
I thought there was a cost to checkpoint the channel-open with the BTC blockchain.
60  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Lightning Network Discussion Thread on: July 21, 2018, 06:50:28 PM
Quote
"Problem with nLockTime is that it's hard to broadcast these transactions, so you'd have to leave your Bitcoin node running"..
-Sjors at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8431

Should be able to drop your HTLC to a much lower value, like 3-4 hours instead of 24 hours.
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 ... 206 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!