tl;dr: Good news for the FTC - The Judge has allowed the original complaint to be amended. Bad news for Butterfly Labs.

http://ia802308.us.archive.org/32/items/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531.308.0.pdf

IT IS ORDERED FTCs Motion and Suggestions in Support to Amend Complaint (Doc. #274) is
GRANTED. Plaintiff is directed to file its amended complaint within three days. It is further
ORDERED FTCs Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses (Doc. #254) is DENIED AS MOOT.
Signed on 5/13/15 by District Judge Brian C. Wimes. (Baldwin, Joella)

Nightmare fuel right here...

That #8 though... The way Homero brutalizes the english language is almost enough to disqualify him entirely.

I know children that write better than he does.

No updates yet.

Updated: http://ia802308.us.archive.org/32/items/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531.docket.html

tl;dr: The Judge shot down the FTC's motion for reconsideration of "The December Order" that allowed Butterfly Labs to reopen after the failure of the ex parte injunction.

http://ia902308.us.archive.org/32/items/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531.304.0.pdf

The funky bunch hasn't posted on here in a while, and it's become boring beating the dead horse that is Butterfly Labs until the trial starts.

Following the GAW drama is scratching my itch for soap-operas until then.

https://www.physics.upenn.edu/node/45548

Something tells me Ms. Hermundstad is a bit too preoccupied doing science, to get involved in this mess.

Brutal article. Homero is so hosed...

EDIT: https://hashtalk.ch/topic/37607/interview-with-josh-garza/14

So, what is it with people named "Josh" in Bitcoin space being complicit in fraudulent behavior ?

Which Josh do you think will be held legally to account first ?

FTFY.

Portrait of a sociopath right there.

This Josh Garza dude is quite the little cretin, huh ? It's absolutely stunning to take in his mental acrobatics.

ref: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/wicked-deeds/201401/how-tell-sociopath-psychopath

1800+ pages documenting Garza's malfeasant stupidity !

Hanlon's razor ?

Updated: http://ia802308.us.archive.org/32/items/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531.docket.html

http://ia802308.us.archive.org/32/items/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531.302.0.pdf

Case 4:14-cv-00815-BCW Document 302 Filed 05/06/15 Page 1 of 2

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

On May 5, 2015, the Court conducted a telephonic status conference with the parties. Based on this discussion, it is hereby

ORDERED this case is set for trial on March 28, 2016 at 9:00 A.M., Courtroom 7D, at the United States Courthouse in Kansas City, Missouri. It is further

ORDERED this case is set for a final pretrial conference on March 10, 2016 at 1:30 P.M. via telephone conference; the Courtroom Deputy, Joella Baldwin, will arrange participation. It is further

ORDERED any dispositive motions, except those under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(2) or (3), shall be filed on or before November 16, 2015. It is further

ORDERED all motions to strike expert designations or preclude expert testimony premised on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), shall be filed on or before November 16, 2015. It is further

ORDERED each party shall designate any expert witnesses it intends to call at trial on or before August 24, 2015. Each party shall designate any responsive expert witnesses it intends to call at trial on or before September 14, 2015. This paragraph applies to all witnesses from whom expert opinions will be elicited, regardless of whether the witness was specially retained to provide trial testimony. It is further

ORDERED all fact pretrial discovery authorized by the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure shall be completed on or before August 10, 2015; all expert discovery shall be completed on or before October 5, 2015. It is further

ORDERED all other dates and requirements in the Scheduling Order (Docs. #234, #238) remain unchanged. It is further

ORDERED that all additional briefing related to the Temporary Receiver’s fees be filed under seal. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to file this briefing under seal. It is further

ORDERED the Temporary Receiver shall have seven (7) days to file a reply to Defendants’ objections regarding the Temporary Receiver’s fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: May 6, 2015
/s/Brian C. Wimes
JUDGE BRIAN C. WIMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

If you're going to keep spamming this copypasta, at least fix the spelling of "loser", please.

Dear ignorant fuckface.

I've been mining BTC since August 2010.

My personal farm has grown to be quite respectable over the years, if I don't say so myself. I am doing something by mining, in addition to running a full node.

I'm not "following" any "thief". I would appreciate you not making misguided assertions such as that. It ultimately makes you look more foolish when your scheme inevitably comes crashing down, and your life will become increasingly stressful.

Seems to me you are just outlandishly striking out at those that are calling you out on a bizarrely defensive stance with an obviously dubious business venture.

Either way, we are fortunate that the law does not consider stupidity a valid legal defense.

Ok, now you are just being clearly evasive and dismissive.

How does your vendetta against Bruno legitimize your questionable and dubious scheme with stakeminers.com ?

EDIT:
It's called libel when it's in written form.

Have fun, sweetie !

Thanks ! I appreciate your kind words.

Slow down there cowboy. Not defending anyone. Merely giving context. I've been harsh on Bruno a couple times in the past if you care to dig through my post history a year or so ago.

And again, how does your vendetta against Bruno legitimize your questionable and dubious scheme ?