|
the tweetshow has begun, MAX YOU FAILED - BRING IT ON NOW OR NEVER!!!!
50k followers eager to get onto mining xD
|
|
|
|
|
MONEYMONEY LICK MY BALL I GOT DOLLAR BILLS ------ THATS WHAT THEy THINK RIGHT NOW
|
|
|
|
|
THIS TWEET WENT OUT TO 120 TOP FINANCIAL ANALYSTS And HEDGIES!!!!!!!
@5spree
#MAXCOIN IPO COMPLETE FAIL!!!!!!!
@maykeiser insider already mining while the massed are locked out!!! @maxcoinproject #bitcoin #nasdaq
|
|
|
|
SCAM, UNFAIR AND HORRIBLY ORGANISED LAUNCH AND INSIDERS ALREADY MINING
RETWEET!!! RETWEET!!!! |
|
|
|
|
JUS TWEETED TO 50 K financial followers, sorry guys
|
|
|
|
SCAM, UNFAIR AND HORRIBLY ORGANISED LAUNCH AND INSIDERS ALREADY MINING
RETWEET!!! |
|
|
|
Can You upload also needed libs ? Thanks!!! STOP POSTING BENCHMARK SCREEENS YOU FOOL |
|
|
|
T SCAM TAG - BECAUSE NO POOL ONLINE; BOTTERS AND INSIDERS TAKING OFF THE CREAM SCAM SCAM SCAM
I hate to say it but it looks like this is the case. Rocketpool just stopped accepting any www traffic with bad gateway, but they had about 20 users on there mining this coin before that happened, and one of them "ben" had 134 shares, with the next closest user at like 10 or something. The problem is, i really care (proof search sippsnap nvidia, i poseted about this a year ago), was wating for sha3 innovation for a long time, now this. COMPLETE FAIL IF IT GOES LIKE THIS |
|
|
|
|
FOR PRICIPLE DONT RELEASE WINDOWS ANYTHING!!!! TUXTUXTUX
|
|
|
|
|
5 minutes till i TWEET SCAM to 50 K followers!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
SCAM TAG - BECAUSE NO POOL ONLINE; BOTTERS AND INSIDERS TAKING OFF THE CREAM SCAM SCAM SCAM
|
|
|
|
|
IS THERE ANY WORKING POOL?
|
|
|
|
STOP POSTING BENCHMARK, I WANT TO SEE REAL POOL MINING
DUDE, ITS NOT RELEASED YET!!!! CALM THE FUCK DOWN YOU MORON Who is the moron, the person who demands a service that has been announced to be released IN TIME??? |
|
|
|
|
STOP POSTING BENCHMARK, I WANT TO SEE REAL POOL MINING
|
|
|
|
would love a compiled 'keccak' windows version to test out my 2x 295 GTX's on  or maybe a good time to settle for a solid os ^^. |
|
|
|
is it possible that the second number ie 32 on K112x42 is the Theoretical Shader Processing Rate which is on the geforce 9800gtx+ 420 ie 42 the which seems the max. [2014-02-06 11:57:09] Total: 123688 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:57:09] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 123586 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:57:09] Total: 123586 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:57:09] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 123993 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:57:09] Total: 123993 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:57:09] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 124198 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:57:09] Total: 124198 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:57:09] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 124096 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:57:09] Total: 124096 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:57:09] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 124506 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:57:09] Total: 124506 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:57:09] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 124609 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:57:09] Total: 124609 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:57:09] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 124816 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:57:09] Total: 124816 khash/s
~/CudaMiner$ ./cudaminer -a keccak -l K112x42 --benchmark
112= Stream Processors 42.0= Theoretical Shader Processing Rate (Gigaflops) this would explain my K112 is max and x42 is max??? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeForce_9_Series#9800M_GTX_.5B6.5D |
|
|
|
|
What exactly is the second number (32) standing for? K300x32
Ive just played around a bit and figured my 9800gtx+ has 128 stream processors, K128/42 is the highest value i an run without errors.
But still like fishing in the dark, ive not really a clue what im doing here ^^.
|
|
|
|
whoop, is that valid or am i missing something? [2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 133856 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:12:06] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 134864 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 134864 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:12:06] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 133981 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 133981 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:12:06] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 133981 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 133981 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:12:06] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 133731 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 133731 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:12:06] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 133607 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 133607 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:12:06] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 132495 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 132495 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:12:06] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 135501 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 135501 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:12:06] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 133856 khash/s
[2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 133856 khash/s
:~/CudaMiner$ ./cudaminer -a keccak -l K112x40 --benchmark http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeForce_9_Series#9800M_GTX_.5B6.5D |
|
|
|
|
just played around a but with the miner in bench mode and the keccak algo on a NVIDIA 9800 GTX+ (with huge cooling rips), running on kubuntu 13.10.
When i fired the miner up i got 7961 khash/s, card went hot and it dropped to 621.49 khash/s and staying constantly there .
Will ply a it more tomorrow ^^.
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
