I see myself as a crypto millionaire. I started the year as a crypto billionaire.

Sending a small amount first is not a bad idea. It is unlikely that there will be a problem with the address but it will test your ability to send correctly.

When you receive bitcoins you should use an address once. However, the exchange is receiving the bitcoins from you in this case, so it doesn't matter.

On the other hand, I change deposit addresses occasionally. If my deposit address can be associated with me, someone could potentially track the amount that I deposit into the exchange. Changing the deposit address makes that more difficult.

Read this:

Inheritance Planning for Cryptocurrencies: 3 Steps in 3 Minutes

Also,

https://www.amazon.com/Cryptoasset-Inheritance-Planning-Simple-Owners/dp/1947910116
https://bitcoinundco.com/en/pamela-morgan-inheritance-planning-crypto-assets/

It smells like a scam to me.

They claim to have been working on this since 2008 (wtf?), yet the websites are new, anonymous, and lack any real content.

Sorry for your loss, but cryptocurrencies don't need saving. Plus, if they can't succeed on their own, the aren't worth saving.

Taproot is the next big thing. It will unlock many new capabilities and enable more secure and more efficient transactions.

The new address needs to be signed with the old address. Nesting may be sufficient, but I was explicitly stating that the new address is also valid.

I guess this would be sufficient:


Edit: nested signatures work if the signing software modifies markers of the interior message as above.

Here is my understanding:

The point of posting an address is to give you the ability to use that address later to prove that you were the owner of the account at the time that the address was posted.

Posting a address does not prove that the account holder controls the address, but that may be a reasonable assumption if a signed message stating that fact is posted.

Quoting the post helps to ensure that any subsequent change to the post can be detected.

Signing a message has a minor benefit. It allows the address owner to make a statement (but note that the statement can be false). Typically, the address owner asserts that they control the account and that a signed message is sufficient proof of ownership of the account. It is assumed that the account holder would not post the signed message if they did not accept it.

In short, the user should post this signed message and it needs to be quoted:


In posting a signed message containing the new address, the current account holder proves that they are the original account holder and presumably states that a message signed with the new address is also sufficient proof. This effectively makes messages signed with the new address as good as messages signed with the old address.

Posting a new address not signed with the old address gives the current account holder a way to later prove that they owned the account, but it does not prove that they are the original account holder.

I think your suggestion is good, but I would do it more like this because it is more secure. Note that the message signed with the new address is contained in the first signed message. This prevents anyone, including mods and hackers, from substituting a different new address. On the other hand, if the new address is signed with both addresses separately like you did, I suppose that works just as well.


Edit: nested signatures work if the signing software modifies markers of the interior message as above.

My point is that nobody here is likely to have the knowledge and expertise to answer your questions. If you want answers to your questions, google is a better alternative.  On the other hand, if you want the expert medical opinions of Jet Cash, et. al., then I suppose you have come to the right place.

120/80 would be normal right? -- What Is the Normal Blood Pressure Range?
Is it overblown? ... -- Is high blood pressure always bad?
How does blood pressure over time damage the body,...? -- Effects of High Blood Pressure on Your Body
When you're running, what is a normal blood pressure? ... -- When is it normal for blood pressure to increase?
Is blood pressure as easy to quantify as a person's weight. -- What is blood pressure and how is it measured?

I feel stupid typing your questions into google and then giving you what I thought were the best hits, but there you go.

Finding a scientific proof of the existence of a god is impossible. I would be much more interested in seeing each of you prove (scientifically) that the other's religion is a hoax.

I don't know why you are asking these questions in a Bitcoin forum. I am certainly not qualified to answer them, but a simple google search led me to this: High blood pressure dangers: Hypertension's effects on your body

Good explanations. I would add there are risks with stop loss and stop limit orders.

A stop loss creates a market order and a market order is filled at any price. If the price is falling quickly, the order could be filled far below the trigger price. This is how people get burned in a flash crash.

A stop limit creates a limit order that may never be filled. The order will never be filled if the price does not remain at or above the limit price or return to the limit price. Setting the limit price below the trigger price reduces this risk but there is still no guarantee.

Is it a Ponzi scheme or an experiment? It can't be both.

Please don't write an article that attempts to explain something that you know nothing about. There are already too many articles about Bitcoin that promote ignorance, misinformed biases, misconceptions, and factual errors. Why must you contribute to that?

I know that this is not your focus, but it must be noted that the claim of having a video is lie. It is a common scam that was popular last year.

There is no video. They typically show the victim one of their passwords as evidence of gaining access to the victim's computer. However, they obtain the password from a public database and not by hacking the computer.

The blackmail can be safely ignored.

Then you must send the coins from one wallet to an address in the other wallet. That is the only way to move them and there must be a record of the transaction.

Now, there are different ways to achieve varying levels of security and secrecy, and you must be more specific in describing your goals.

In your acoustic demo, the waves are traveling through mass and causing the mass to move, which propels the boat. In essence, it is a propeller with no moving parts. However, your EM version creates standing waves in empty (devoid of mass) space. How is that the same? I suppose your goal is to use EM to generate momentum, right? Has that ever been demonstrated before?

Radioactive decay

I thought that recent experiments finally removed any possibility of the EmDrive being a real thing.