Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 04:05:00 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 [84] 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 ... 479 »
1661  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How did Grayscale get so much Bitcoin? on: November 19, 2020, 05:39:22 AM
I feel like nobody has correctly or sufficiently explained what Grayscale is and what it does. Here is my explanation:

What is the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust?
The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is basically an ETF. It's sole function is to own bitcoins. It does not have any income and it doesn't make a profit. It just owns bitcoins. It is not a custodian. It doesn't hold bitcoins for you in an account.

As an ETF, it has shareholders. Each shareholder owns a proportional share of the assets of the ETF (primarily bitcoins, of course). The shares of the trust can be bought and sold. There are currently 540,935,800 shares and the fund holds about 515,000 BTC, so each share is worth a little less than 1/1000 BTC.

Where does the fund get its bitcoins?
The fund acquires bitcoins by giving accredited investors shares of the fund in exchange for bitcoins. So, for example, if you deposited 1 BTC into the fund today, you would receive about 1050 shares of GBTC. As a result, the total number of bitcoins held by the fund would go up by 1 and the total number of shares would go up by 1050.

Investors are willing to deposit their bitcoins into the fund because they can make an instant profit of about 15%. For example, 1 BTC is worth about $18k, but the 1050 shares of GBTC they would receive by depositing that 1 BTC are currently worth about $21k.

Restrictions
There are some restrictions.
  • Anyone can buy and sell the shares on the open market, but you must be an accredited investor in order to receive shares by depositing bitcoins into the fund.
  • An investor that deposits bitcoins and receives shares cannot sell those shares for 6 months.
  • Shares currently cannot be redeemed for bitcoins.

Why would investors own GBTC when they could own BTC directly?

  • GBTC can be held in a retirement account, which could mean that gains are not taxed. If you are expecting a 10x return on your bitcoins, you might consider holding GBTC in a Roth IRA instead.
  • If you deposit bitcoins into the fund, the shares you receive are worth more than the bitcoins you deposited.
  • You can make money by arbitrage from the difference between the value of the shares versus the value of the bitcoins they represent.
  • Convenience.
1662  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Are there protections built-in against 51% attack? on: November 16, 2020, 02:25:53 AM
As per my understanding, with a successful 51% attack, an attacker can confirm invalid transactions and do double spending of BTC. They can probably reverse recent transactions too.

Are there any capabilities built into the code of Bitcoin or Bitcoin mining node softwares to tackle a scenario like this?

Since majority of the hashing power is controlled by the adversary in the case of 51% attack, they can literally do anything for as long as they can sustain the attack.

It is not true that they can do anything.

  • A miner cannot confirm invalid transactions because that would split the chain.
  • The ability to double spend is limited because it requires mining an additional number of old blocks faster than everyone else can mine just new blocks.
  • 51% of the hash power also allows the attacker to censor transactions for as long as they have 51%

As for defenses, they are mainly economic, especially against double spending. However, there is potentially no defense against a 51% attack used to censor transactions except perhaps politics.
1663  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Tulip claims vs Someone else (claiming ownership) on: November 16, 2020, 02:08:28 AM
For argument sake, yes they have filed court arguments claiming to be the owners of the wallets, ... But what if someone else had the keys to these accounts?
Basically having the keys establishes ownership to the wallet(s) but also since these are dormant basically abandoned wouldn't this be all that is needed? or due to the attempts by Wright and Tulip would this need to be battled out in court? More so the country which these would be moved or claimed in would be relevant as well, ... So i am just wondering about that scenario... any thoughts?

Having the private keys means having control over the bitcoins, but it does not necessarily mean having legal ownership of the bitcoins.
1664  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I made a cartoon movie revealing the secret of Bitcoin and Darknet on: November 15, 2020, 08:27:12 AM
1. why were you unable to finish the video?
2. the SHA-256 is so money will not be duplicated, but it also includes the signals from telescopes to be calculated, that why since Bitcoin, NASA has discovered many more stars since ever
3. Do you think that U.S Navy decided to be nice and for no reason share darknet with the public so public can sell drags and other crime? or maybe they share it with public to save NASA and CERN billions of dollars every year.
4. I have decided to make another episode, by the end of the week it will be ready. And please LIKE even if you don't agree with me, LIKE is the crypto currency of honor.  

1. There were too many factual errors and too much obvious lack of understanding. I felt that I would gain no benefit from continuing.
2. You obviously don't know what SHA-256 is or what it does. Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3dqhixzGVo
3. They shared onion routing with the public 20 years before bitcoin was invented.
4. I can't wait ...
1665  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I made a cartoon movie revealing the secret of Bitcoin and Darknet on: November 15, 2020, 08:19:34 AM
The animation was great and I left a like.
The animation is good,...
You are talented on creating animation ...
Yes, he is good in creating animation.

For everyone that feels that talshachar's video demonstrates talent, I would like you to watch this video. It's my first ever and it took about an hour.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwsRDW7q82E
1666  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2020-11-12]A Bitcoin Mining Pool Is Deliberately Censoring Transactions on: November 13, 2020, 11:39:37 AM
It's a waste of effort. Only the blocks that the pool adds to the chain will be censored, and transactions not included in those blocks will be included in the other blocks. The worst that can happen is that an affected transaction takes a little longer to confirm.
1667  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Is there a (simple) way to create a PGP key from a seed? on: November 13, 2020, 11:21:17 AM
I would point out that after ~7 years, a billion dollars worth of Silk Road coins were seized by the DOJ. How did the feds obtain the private keys to seize these coins? ...

The person with the private key agreed to forfeit the money.
1668  Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here on: November 13, 2020, 11:10:43 AM
It is a tragedy that the message signing feature in Bitcoin Core is broken because it can no longer create an address that it can use for signing.

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Today is November 12, 2020.
My bitcointalk.org user name is odolvlobo.
The purpose of this signed message is to provide a way to prove
that I am the legitimate owner of this Bitcointalk user name.

-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
H476mBZzDNVFhww1lsUn4eANHFiD/m2SZ8VuQL2cHg0ic7Npyx/13HJ83+0YU3zUDXmxEPqM8SaXwIht8LmnSG0=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Please verify and quote. Thank you.
Quoted, but I'm having a hard time to verify your signed message using brainwallet and electrum. I guess using next line on your signed message is the cause of this?

Yes, I think that the new line at the end is the source of all the problems.
1669  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Full node rewards? on: November 13, 2020, 11:05:28 AM
It would make sense for full nodes to charge a fee for that information.
no it doesn't make any sense and it goes against the main principles of a peer to peer network.

If you are not running a full node then you are not really part of the network.
1670  Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here on: November 13, 2020, 01:08:42 AM
It is a tragedy that the message signing feature in Bitcoin Core is broken because it can no longer create an address that it can use for signing.

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Today is November 12, 2020.
My bitcointalk.org user name is odolvlobo.
The purpose of this signed message is to provide a way to prove
that I am the legitimate owner of this Bitcointalk user name.

-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
H476mBZzDNVFhww1lsUn4eANHFiD/m2SZ8VuQL2cHg0ic7Npyx/13HJ83+0YU3zUDXmxEPqM8SaXwIht8LmnSG0=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Here is my PGP signature:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Today is November 12, 2020.
My Bitcointalk user name is odolvlobo.
The purpose of this signed message is to provide a way to prove
that I am the legitimate owner of this Bitcointalk user name.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=EG9H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Please verify and quote. Thank you.
1671  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I made a cartoon movie revealing the secret of Bitcoin and Darknet on: November 12, 2020, 11:17:39 PM
There are so many factual errors that nothing in the video can be taken seriously. Please don't make another episode until you can fix the first one.

I was unable to finish the video. Does it ever explain how SHA-256 hashes of block headers can be used by NASA to "calculate the signals from one billion stars" or to help CERN "compute the collisions between electrons they make in their tunnels"?

BTW, it is no secret that the U.S. Navy invented onion routing.

Onion routing was developed in the mid-1990s at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory by employees Paul Syverson, Michael G. Reed, and David Goldschlag[3][4] to protect U.S. intelligence communications online.[5] It was further developed by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and patented by the Navy in 1998.[4][6][7]

Computer scientists Roger Dingledine and Nick Mathewson joined Syverson in 2002 to develop what would become the largest and best known implementation of onion routing, Tor, then called The Onion Routing project (TOR project). After the Naval Research Laboratory released the code for Tor under a free license,[5][8][9] Dingledine, Mathewson and five others founded The Tor Project as a non-profit organization in 2006, with the financial support of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and several other organizations.[10][11]
1672  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Full node rewards? on: November 12, 2020, 10:59:07 PM
Why doesn't the bitcoin network reward full node runners? I know as an ex-miner that miners do most of the job but since full nodes help propagate the blocks shouldn't they be rewarded something? Running a full node DOES cost money. I mean don't give them 12.5 but at least 0.00001 per day/per unique public IP or something!! We all know that solo mining is a bad idea, so what incentive (other than helping the society and being good [ which doesn't make your wallet happy btw ]) does a full node runner have?Wouldn't we see a faster blockchain if we had more full nodes?

Your primary benefit from running a full node is the security of your bitcoins.

Also, people who don't run full nodes depend on full nodes to provide them with transaction information. It would make sense for full nodes to charge a fee for that information.
1673  Economy / Reputation / Re: [Interviews] with Bitcointalk members on: November 11, 2020, 09:33:42 AM
1. When and why did you become interested in cryptocurrencies?

In July 2011, I was researching alternative currencies and found out about Bitcoin (among others).

2. When and why did you buy your first bitcoin?

I bought a small amount late in 2011 in order to pay for some Casascius coins. Bitcoins were about $4 at the time.

3. How did you get on the forum?

I started reading Bitcointalk in 2011, but I didn't join and start posting until July 2012.

4.1. What prevents mass adoption of cryptocurrencies?

I believe that adoption has been hindered by its lack of usability and its lack of strong use-cases, but those will lessen with more adoption.

4.2. How do you think mass advertising of gambling projects has a positive effect on the development of the forum or harms the community?

I think that if Bitcoin is seen as useful for gambling, the effect will be positive for Bitcoin and this site.

4.3. How do you consider whether 2-3 years of experience in cryptocurrency is enough to successfully invest or does an investor need to receive special education?

People are better off if they only invest in things they understand. Investing in something you don't understand is no better than gambling. The level of your understanding should determine the amount of your investment.

5. What do you think of the current Merit system and signature campaigns? Do they harm the forum?

I believe that signature campaigns are bad for the forum. They encourage people to post in order to make money rather than to learn or be helpful. I think the merit system has helped, though I think the ultimate solution is to remove the incentive for signature campaigns.

6. The most useful forum topic?

I mostly read posts in Bitcoin Discussion, Legal, Press, Development & Technical Discussion, Economics, Beginners & Help, and Serious Discussion.

7. 3 things you would implement on the forum?
Better formatting (tables, cough cough) and better search.

8. Do you trade on exchanges or invest in projects?

I don't trade much. Trading is difficult to do profitably and its not worth my time and effort -- I already have a job.

9. Tell a story about your big profit or big loss?

I lost some that I invested in mining farms.
I lost some bitcions when I thought I could outsmart people investing in Pirate's ponzi scheme.
I lost the small amount that I was too lazy to withdraw from Cryptsy.
On the other hand, I sold some at $18,000 and bought it all back at $4000.

10. What do you think about the DEFI ecosystem?

I think it has potential, but right now it is in a big bubble. People are going to get rekt when the exuberance wears off, the scams fall apart, and token prices return to rationality.

11. Is your anonymity a vital necessity or precaution?

It is mostly a precaution, but when there there is no benefit to being identified, I try to be anonymous.

12. The last cryptocurrency book you read?

I'm reading The Bitcoin Standard right now.

13. Advise 3 cryptocurrencies/tokens for investment in the next 1-2 years?

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Monero. But more importantly, I would advise against investing in any coin or token that has no real purpose or is not valued for what it is intended. That means avoid all of the D-Fi "governance" tokens, and avoid any project that is just a promise or a pyramid scheme.

14. How much will Bitcoin cost at the end of 2020?

I have no idea, and I don't really care, actually. I mostly hope for more adoption.
1674  Other / Serious discussion / Re: What do you think of changing the demographic of a country to win elections? on: November 11, 2020, 06:56:41 AM
We can all agree, basically, that an easy way to win an election in a democratic country - is to import foreign people who support the same ideology as those importing them... or to export those disagreeing with it. What do you think of this democratic strategy to win elections?

Easy? I don't think it is easy at all. If you are a presidential candidate in the U.S., you would need to import 160 million people in order to guarantee a win. Good luck!
1675  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Electrum Mac - Verify signature on electrum DMG - Not trusted - on: November 10, 2020, 11:22:59 PM
-snip-
When I attempt to verify signature of the electrum dmg file, it says 'untrusted file' 'signature not to be trusted'

Ive tried many times, downloading the files form electrum.org, reinstalling thomas v's key in GPG, but always the same response when i try to verify.
-snip-
That's because you haven't changed the Owner trust Thomas Voegtlin setting on the GPG Keychain.
Here I try to provide a guide:
...
After import the key, double-click the Thomas Voegtlin key. In the Owner Trust column, select Full or Ultimate:


Set the trust to Full. Ultimate is only for your own keys. Full is for other keys that have been proven to you.

Trust level explanation: https://gpgtools.tenderapp.com/kb/faq/what-is-ownertrust-trust-levels-explained
1676  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Is there a (simple) way to create a PGP key from a seed? on: November 09, 2020, 11:14:34 PM
Hello
I'm looking for a way to generate a PGP private key from a Bitcoin mnemonic seed (or a private key)
Does anyone know how I could do it please?
Thank you very much

I'm not an expert on PGP, but I know that it can use ECC with 256-bit private keys, so I guess BIP 32 and BIP 39 can be applied. However, I have never seen it.
1677  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: lets imagine world without fiat currency on: November 09, 2020, 09:10:06 PM
Go on a trip to China and you will not have to imagine anything. People there almost don't use fiat currencies. And soon they will start using only digital yuan.

The yuan, whether digital or paper, is a fiat currency.

You (and many other people) seem to be confused about what a "fiat" currency is. "Fiat" doesn't mean that it is printed on paper.

A fiat currency is a government-controlled currency whose value is not backed by anything.

The dollar, euro, yen, yuan, franc, peso, pound, dram, ruble, rupee, etc., regardless of the country or whether they are digital or printed on paper, are all fiat currencies.

BTW, some people consider any un-backed currency to be a fiat currency, and that would include Bitcoin.
1678  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Cracking bitcoin wallets? on: November 08, 2020, 11:31:22 PM
This wallet was probably hacked some days ago https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1HQ3Go3ggs8pFnXuHVHRytPCq5fGG8Hbh
1 000 000 000 USD !!!!  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

It wasn't hacked.

23. On November 3, 2020, Individual X signed a Consent and Agreement to Forfeiture with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of California. In that agreement, Individual X, consented to
the forfeiture of the Defendant Property to the United States government.

24. On November 3, 2020, the United States took custody of the Defendant Property from 1HQ3.
1679  Other / Serious discussion / Re: California Court of Appeal / Coinbase: not your keys, not your (forked) coins? on: November 08, 2020, 09:35:58 PM
As said before, by quoting "(...) plaintiff argues nothing advises the customer he may not be able to access the private keys (...)", I believe this judge seriously hints in that direction.

If such decision were to be pronounced in the future, its effect on exchanges could be very disruptive, and understanding or misunderstanding "how custodians work" would in that case be completely irrelevant. The only question left would then be "how custodians must work".

That's a good point. There is nothing that prevents a regulator from dictating how the custodian must operate.
1680  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Did R. Ver have any involvement in SR? on: November 08, 2020, 10:47:50 AM
I don't know if this is taboo in the BTC community but from my seriously extensive research, I find it hard not to connect Rodger Ver to the SR and DPR in some way. There's either just this dot that I'm not connecting or overlooking.

I have not seen anything linking Roger directly to Silk Road and DPR. He is connected to Mark Karpeles, who is rumored to be somehow connected to Silk Road. How do you connect him? What do you know that nobody else knows?
Pages: « 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 [84] 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 ... 479 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!