|
Great, thanks for the update.
Now that Makomk, TheSeven and Glasswalker worked out a high performing bitstream, I'm glad to hear this will become a regularly stocked item (and suspect others are as well).
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Yohan,
Just curious if you have an updated ETA for when the boards will be available again. Is October still expected?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday after sending coins, I checked the transactions in block explorer and saw strange behavior I don't understand. Below is what happened. If anyone understands this I'd really appreciate an explaination.
I have a wallet that only receives coins to a single address. Over time this wallet has accumulated coins from many smaller transactions, but since only one address is used to receive them this one address has grown and has all my coins.
So, as of yesterday: a) the total number of coins in block explorer for that address = b) the number of coins in my wallet.
Yesterday I sent coins for the first time (played a few small rounds of SatoshiDice). I then checked blockexplorer to see the transactions, but the values listed in blockexplorer did not match the BTC sent. Here is what block explorer showed. (Values/addresses provided for example only, not actual)
Transaction 1 - 1 BTC total - 1 BTC sent to 1dice7W2AicHosf5EL3GFDUVga7TgtPFn ( the actual transaction )
Transaction 2 - 1 BTC total - 1 BTC sent to 1dice7W2AicHosf5EL3GFDUVga7TgtPFn ( the actual transaction )
Transaction 3 - 3 BTC total - 1 BTC sent to 1dice7W2AicHosf5EL3GFDUVga7TgtPFn ( the actual transaction )
- 2 BTC sent to [some other address ] ( extra coins sent, I don't know why )
Transaction 2 - 2 BTC total - 1 BTC sent to 1dice7W2AicHosf5EL3GFDUVga7TgtPFn ( the actual transaction )
- 1 BTC sent to [some other address ] ( extra coins sent, I don't know why )
After this, I now see the following:
a) Block explorer shows my address as having 3 BTC less than it should (i.e. instead of starting value - 4BTC sent, it has starting value - 7BTC)
b) My bitcoin client transactions do not match block explorer (i.e. the 3rd transaction shows -1BTC in the bitcoin client but -3BTC in block explorer)
c) However, my bitcoin client shows the correct transaction amounts and correct total coins...
My guess is when I sent the coins, instead of just sending coins out to the given address, the bitcoin client created 2 new address for my wallet and sent a random number of coins to those addresses as well. This explains why my wallet in the client still shows the correct number of coins, I'm guessing those new extra addresses are part of my wallet now, it is the only way the numbers add up.
Is this correct? If so why does this happen? Or is something seriously screwed up?
I'm using the standard wallet 0.6.3beta if that helps.
Thanks for any comments/thoughts
|
|
|
|
|
Great work putting this together, thanks.
The link to the code you refer to in the initial post "sample_armory_code.py", is no longer working. I'd love to check it out and try building/running it myself. Is there anywhere else where the code is posted?
|
|
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------- Price per kWh | 0.33-0.35 USD Current as @ | Aug 2012 Provider | www.pge.comState/Province | KKKalifornia Country | USSA ---------------------------------------------------------- This is the highest of the 3 residential tiers, since my base load already puts me in the highest tier all my incremental bitcoin mining is charged at the highest tier. It's people like me who are waiting for ASICs... |
|
|
|
Thanks everyone for replying. The instructions were crystal clear. It's embarrasing but I was using my id's password and didn't realize the worker had a different password. That is what I get for playing with new ecoins at 1am.  |
|
|
|
|
I tried this pool for the first time with both Reaper and cgminer, neither could connect to server ltc.kattare.com
Anyone else run into this recently? Is the server up? Or do I just have no idea what I'm doing.
The exact same cgminer works fine with my 5870s on deepbit for BTC, so not sure what is going on.
|
|
|
|
|
Ordered 1 single on 8/8/2012 and will post back when it's recieved.
Like someone else I did not receive any email confirmation after ordering, but BFL responded to an email that they received the order and it was in the list.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but then the FED and US Gov will throw 0.0001% of their computing power in Nevada at the network and bring it down.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm rocks, this is #3 of 5
|
|
|
|
|
When I first started mining, it was with my laptop GPU to just try out the environment. I signed up for pooled mining because that seemed easiest (with deepbit).
Within my first day deepbit marked my account as having found a block, with a 6MHash/s rate and BTC payout of <0.01. Ah well.
So this is post #2 of 5 so my newbie account can reply to another post elsewhere. Not sure what my other 3 posts should be.....
|
|
|
|
|
So although I'm a newbie, after reading on these forums for awhile I found a post I wanted to reply to.
Then found out I can't reply do to the restrictions. There has to be a better way.
My current need is to reply to a specific post, I do not have anything I want to do right now.
So I'm forced to create 5 empty posts (this is #1). Again there has to be a better way.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
