You predicted that the price would drop after it skyrocketed to speculation fueled unmaintainable levels? What should we call you oh great one? The Oracle of Bitcoin?

I'll take any of those useless Bitcoins that you want to get rid of.

Yes, and I dare him to prove me wrong. But either way I don't really care since it's just fun to watch everyone get spun up over this the farce.

I just can't wait to see the 100+ security issues that plague bitcoin that were fixed in SC2. Just like the 85+ security issues between Bitcoin and SC1.03 where the client was insecure because it said Bitcoin instead of Solidcoin and insane amounts of improperly formatted whitespace.

When <some less than likely condition is met>, all will be made quite clear.

This sounds so cultish, give me the chills.

It'll be much more fun to watch when the reality that people are only in it to mine and dump sets in on his delusions of grandeur. He'll probably be left with slightly less people on his bandwagon as he goes off to code SC 3.0, probably before opening the source to SC 2.0.

That was someone taking publicly available Bitcoin addresses and totaling up the Bitcoins for that address from the block chain trying to see who has the most Bitcoins.

That's why I have 1 of my addresses designated for "Donations" and it's the only one I publicly post.

I think we need a new subforum for Alternative Crypto Currencies -> Protest Currencies, currencies solely launched in protest of something they didn't like about the original alternative currency

Look for your transaction here first: http://bitcoincharts.com/bitcoin/

It doesn't look like the network is backed up that much, but if more high priority transactions exist on the network yours might be delayed. If you don't find it there first then it may be a problem with your wallet, try a rescan.

It will be posted on the website. It will be called something like 'How Solidcoin 2.0 Is Ready For The Bitcoin Failure'. Just like the last one it will be mostly fluff and lack any technical detail.

NMC Bitparking : Currently closed, will probably reopen soon, just like i0 did
IXC Bitparking : Open
I0C Bitparking : Open
SLC Bitparking : Closed due to ch's arrogance, along with slc.btcguild

moonco.in : seems to be having it's own problems
Ruxum : don't have a beta account so I don't know, don't see SLC listed on main page
btc-e.com : still seems to be alive


So what's your complaint again, that you ability to trade has been impacted at some point, but not so much right now?

Did I say that? No. I don't care about your BTCExpress agenda.


Then sell them already and get over it. Again, I don't care about your BTCExpress agenda, and reading it on every post is getting old.

I don't care about the 1/4 million pre-mined coins. Incentives make perfect sense to me for someone who's second to market.

I made a nice profit on ixcoins, despite the fact that I didn't believe in what ix or i0 were selling. I didn't get in the i0 startup because I predicted that it was going to be a mess due to the hype and launch date.



No, I said 'you get to have input' just like it's written and just like what I meant. Since ch is an egomaniac and super awesome pro coder I thought it was funny that he was actually RFQ'ing since he dismissed all the bitcoin dev's and everyone else's peer reviews. Perhaps he learning except that he has essentially killed his "product" without having something to replace it.



I said I never owned solidcoins, partly because I was offline the week that they launched. I might have gotten in on the launch depending on the situation, but I would never have gotten on the bandwagon. Exactly how do you read 'only holds bitcoins and only explicitly trusts in them'. You need some serious comprehension help. I didn't pay cash for my bitcoins, maybe you did, I won't assume, the value fluctuating doesn't concern me very much since I am not an investor.  And I do trust Bitcoins more than any alt chain fork, until given a legit reason not to, which I haven't seen yet. Until then, the squabbling of all the alt chains is my As The World Turns.

Rampant attacks? : 1 or 2 at the most doesn't equal rampant, and solidcoin's arrogance is a wash with being attacked as far as I'm concerned, a little humility on his part would have saved everyone a lot of time and trouble.

Rampant threat of attacks? : You've never been threatened before? It seems to happen everywhere now.
Bored teenager syndrome? : Also exists everywhere now a days.

And so far everything you have said is putting blame toward someone else and on the defensive. Just pointing that out.

I'd like to know what security enhancements you think you're going to get since none of the 80+ security enhancements that were supposedly fixed in Bitcoin were ever found in solidcoin's source code. Unless bitcoin is in serious trouble of a renaming attack or whitespace overflow.

You're buying the argument that the new version of solidcoin is going to fix every possible security problem with p2p currency protocol from a guy who has !never! once given an acceptable technical explanation of anything.

I didn't say anything about a kill switch, never have, never alluded to it because I saw the removed comment too.

Sure people can keep running it. Why bother though? I doubt any providers are going to support the old block chain, most of them are closed or closing. If any of them are going to offer any services in solidcoin it will be for the new one since there is not a concerted effort to keep the original chain alive, and just keeping an open source copy of the client around and updated doesn't really count. People should have just let it die, but they believed the hype and wanted to believe it was something special. The creator killed it, with nothing to replace it, and now people literally believe in something that doesn't exist.

It's called ignore. Perhaps you should try using it.

So you had faith in solidcoin, the creator intentionally killed it, and you're happy with that? Any value you had in solidcoin is in limbo (if not gone completely), but you're cool with it on the promise of an egomaniac that you will get an equivalent number of "new" coins that might be worth something in a "few weeks" and that you get to have input on features that may or may not go into said new version before it launches?

I've never owned any solidcoins, and yeah, you're too trusting.

If https://github.com/doublec/solidcoin/commits/ is any indication, I can *hardly* contain myself!

Which chain exactly?

The one that he's purposely killing because his cult of personality failed on these forums?

Or the one (that probably don't exist at all) that he refuses to launch and deflects every challenge like a pre-pubescent middle schooler?

There's too many to keep track of.

New poll: Which solidcoin fork do you use?

So now we've gone from making alt chains to who's fork is best? lol

He must really enjoy the sensation he gets from straddling that fence.

Go get 'em Art.

FTFY, it was lacking the Coinhunter marketing fluff/pizzazz

So the answer is no, he can't explain it.

Still true to form, he still refuses to answer any technical questions in any level of detail. Seems to me to be another desperate move to try to maintain control of the project.