Latest posts of: mdzahed134

Quote from: gabbie2010 on May 16, 2020, 06:46:23 AM

Quote from: Latines on May 16, 2020, 06:13:11 AM

Everyone wants to learn how to trade. But the problem is that those who really know how to do this will not sell their knowledge. And those who think they know are happy to teach.

Even some of those traders uses paid signals to generate income for themselves irrespective whether they are making profits consistently or not in their signals, however the best bet is to learn to trade.
Personally I had been into binary options and failed woefully however I had switched over to forex trading which I had been demoing and winning consistently hopefully I will go live soon.

Mostly paid signals are provided from telegram groups, who guys lose money again and again they will turn into paid signals to recover their previous losses, i have no experience so don’t know how much it will success. Lazy traders didn’t use their brain to learn. You gained so many knowledge from your mistakes that is why you winning, live trade is hard than demo.

Quote from: havoc928 on May 06, 2020, 04:47:26 AM

Quote from: Teraboy on May 06, 2020, 04:21:41 AM

Quote from: $anounimus$ on April 29, 2020, 02:17:46 PM

This is one of the strategies made to attract market demand, Sometimes this method is considered successful even if it is not permanent.

If the burning token comes from the pre-mined coin and that will not give any impact to the price. I can teach you if there were so many projects that have already implmented this just like pundi have been getting a very difficult time because it has become useless token.
The token burning idea without come from the profit that already got by the company will be totally useless.

You said incorrectly, Pundi X has really had success in burning tokens and at that time its price increased sharply. but only now when people found out that the business was not performing as planned so investors got out early. Therefore, in this case, Burning token is still one of the great things to help the price increase in the short term. but in the long term, we must consider the success of the project plan.

I think NPXS didn’t burned tokens when it was needed. When investors were disappointed for hold this coin, team's made a plan likes trying to increase price firstly did burned tokens than isn’t worked after a several times burned, delisted a few trading pairs on binance exchange. Pundi X not impacted through of burning tokens, they failed in the plan.

Quote from: CryptoTech_ on May 10, 2020, 10:13:09 AM

Quote from: terciduk123 on May 09, 2020, 08:22:55 PM

so far the TOKOIN (My-T Wallet) app isn't working properly. the price of each token / coin listed there is very not in accordance with that on the exchange. I hope the development team provides information about improving their application.

You are right, this is like a dead project. Data in the application does not correspond to reality
On the T-Wallet the current TOKO price is $ 0.05 but at the actual exchange it is only $ 0.01

I have been used My-T Wallet android apps, not only Tokoin they have provided wrong data on BTC and ETH. Right now you go update, all bugs already fix now for last updated in 26th april in this month. And they implemented a few features, i think staking program is one of the best addition than providing accurate price.

Quote from: Retainly_Collie on May 15, 2020, 02:34:48 PM

Quote from: shadowdio on May 15, 2020, 07:56:10 AM

I promoted this project and I'm also disappointed the price because I never expect this coin was dumped so much, something not right on how this coin was dumped while the market is in good condition, the team maybe? ???Well I hope this coin can recover someday.

The team did not explain any reason for the price collapse. They are completely silent and do not answer anything related to the project. Also I see they have not yet implemented a swap token even though they have switched to another smart contract

Since they did this bullshit we know that their fault in some cases, so how you expect any explanation from them? Even they always avoided such of questions in telegram chat because they haven’t valid answers. Don't disappointed to see this market, bounty huters haven’t nothing.

Quote from: suryana on May 05, 2020, 02:15:57 PM

Quote from: alisonwonder on May 05, 2020, 12:10:49 PM

in my opinion if I still have a lot of remaining balance from the profits from trading results it would not hurt if participating in the new IEO but I suggest you to be more careful when you want to invest in a new IEO, make sure to participate in an exchange place that has a good reputation and often organizes IEO.

Since 2018 until now, many new IEO projects have failed. The main factor I see because they do not make their IEO on Exchange that has a good reputation like Binance, Okex or Kucoin. But it's very rare to find a new IEO project there. Yesterday there was a successful Cartesi project and when CTSI's listing price increased dramatically but now it has plummeted, I don't know why be like that. I still hold some CTSI until now.

OP is absolutely right all of Binance IEO increased a several times, i have seen gradually. not like the price over increased in Cartesi project. It’s seems a big hype project. You mentioned that about failed IEOs in 2018, when such new project weren’t affordable likes these major exchanges, even though when it was latest idea in crypto space, every project can't experiencing that.

Quote from: Ken_terrance on April 10, 2020, 12:06:45 PM

Sometimes extending bounty duration is like expanding the results of the bounty campaign, I don't see anything wrong here, give a good use case and I will promote even if it's over 23 weeks

Yeah extending isn’t a bad even it’s apart of bounty campaign, teams have right to change their general terms. But it’s matter about of allocation, it would be increase. Rather you didn’t expect 20$,50$ rewards instead of 23 weeks. Meanwhile we seeing mostly bounty did extend without increasing. It's seems worst changing in bounty.

Quote from: Greatdev on May 11, 2020, 08:36:23 PM

I won't blame all new projects who choose to use low rated exchanges to raise fund, sometimes it's always money issue, only projects that have private investors, good partnerships and we'll funded aims for top exchanges because they can afford the IEO fee

Most of the new projects definitely can afford to list at least in mid range exchanges such probit exchange is potential, fee is not much high. Why specifically P2PB2B and Latoken are most favorite for fraudsters it’s my question, i see a small number of reliable projects will choose shit exchanges when can't afford exchange fee.

Quote from: CuriousGeorge on April 27, 2020, 10:16:49 AM

Quote from: Bitbtc8 on April 27, 2020, 06:10:31 AM

Is it just me thinking this way or there are other people on here thinking same way? Listed bounty campaigns are getting annoying this year, blockburn postponed payout to bounty hunters, Cartesi split payout into three phases and distribution starts after 30 days of listing.

Too exchange like binance for that matter, bounty allocation was damn low to begin with, I start promoting listed bounties this year because of 2019 tachyon protocol success that lay as a lesson to me but things aren't going as I thought. Harmony one did bounty year ago and I heard they distribute in batches too, price already go down before bounty hunters get their payouts, how is this any fair ?

Please drop your thoughts

FYI, blockburn is a scam project. Tachyon was doing even better than cartesi. Tachyon distributed all of the reward instantly without try to split it into the few phases. The very bad thing from the bounty campaign is there was a rule of the team can change the payment anytime. This is the worst thing int he bounty.

Tachyon terms & condition was they will distribute within 7 days after finish of campaign, so according to rules they didn’t any changes it’s appreciated and i think it might be in every project. Mostly of projects changing their rules after promotion, on time payment is rare. Cartesi promoted a lot through of Binance launchpad, investors acquired their goal to trade this coin.

Quote from: _xNyx_ on March 13, 2020, 08:13:52 PM

As you all may know, Corona is heavily affecting the crypto market, however, do you believe that this is permanent, or will the effects be seen for the next 3, 6, 12 or 18 months?

COVID-19 is the biggest obstacle to sustain on the majority of countries specially jobless people's. Not exactly, you can't specified by timeframe but it's almost sure this pandemic period will not recover very soon as far as medical science reports, at least in the year we have to face the difficulties.

Quote from: qory on May 09, 2020, 03:34:24 AM

After checking with campaign manager I am not trust with this campaign because bounty manager of xcard always delay all bounty manage by him, need ten months later to received payment and always need KYC document for receiving reward from him.

Indeed, if you don’t like KYC than you should avoid these bounty campaigns, mangers never force to join his campaigns, it’s your own choices. So you have no right to blaming this bounty BM. Even though managers have no involvement about KYC as far as i know. This campaign bm is quite trusted. XCARD something ruined his reputation, if i'm not wrong possibly CitiOs deceived.

Quote from: Viscore on May 10, 2020, 07:51:53 AM

Quote from: Mealea on May 10, 2020, 05:52:53 AM

Politics has eaten deep into some many affairs of life and cryptocurrency world is not an exemption. So many things are going wrong all because of what to gain. Many are buying their way into so many areas these days. We can only hope for a better tomorrow. How I wish ICO ranking can take a new turn for the future of cryptocurrency.

I don't think ICO ranking is still useful now that ICO is not anymore popular.
Was not following the most of the IEO now, but I think they have already called it an IEO ranking.

For now, I guess we have to forget about ICO and focus on the IEO as the success are now coming from IEO, especially on big exchange.

True, IEO's didn’t concerned to add in rating sites, actually there no necessity to get positive comments from thrid party. Exchanges is enough to promote through announcing agreement in their social networks before launch. But all of rating sites listed IEO projects without developers permission. I have seen in that cases of Binance launchpad projects.

Past year was worst i have not earn any big payment, i stopped joining in bounty campaigns also airdrop. PPT,DXG was my little bit worthy payments i got approximately 600$ both of these signature campaigns. Significantly at this years going very well, i doing bestchange signature & 1k$+ earned in last few months.

Quote from: milandres0207 on May 10, 2020, 02:20:28 PM

Quote from: big_daddy on August 02, 2019, 10:35:37 AM

Does anyone have some positive feedback from bilaxy.com exchange here?

I have a token that is listed there, with good volume too (as far as I can see on the site), but before I move my funds there, I need to be sure that there is no scam behind, so please share your experience if there is any

Tnx

This exchange platform is not a good one, most p the coin listed to this platform are honestly not potential to trade-in.
That's the truth and reality things happen actually, it has a similarity to Latoken I think. Where most of the altcoins are
just a piece of shit sorry for the term.

If will comparing about liquidity, bilaxy exchange legit than latoken. I know that existence of wash trade in bilaxy here i have trading experienced in many times, there no bad reputation still now. It’s quality good from latoken, this is quite known top exchange among of garbage exchanges.

Quote from: cryptoaddictchie on May 09, 2020, 09:25:40 AM

Quote from: mdzahed134 on May 09, 2020, 09:04:17 AM

Velas is reliable project also if listed in a multiple exchanges, so here rewards is almost guaranteed i think. There’s only 2 categories likes article and vlog campaign, that's reason it shouldn’t to add in the list. Previously i also requested such promosing and exchanges listed campaigns but he avoided for the reason, OLPORTAL wasn’t signature task now it’s ended.

Did I say its not? Supposedly I apologized that I cant entertained such request? It seems like its my fault that I dont add what you say based on your comment. I reiterate a thousand times I think, that I will only considered a campaign with such signature category, what in this line cant you understand. If you have your own ways of dealing with campaigns, feel free to create your own and do what you think is right. I am just here to help, and I created the rules myself, so I hope if you dont mind if respecting that would be okay?

Definitely i respect your efforts also appreciated you for doing good job, a lot of hunters got reliable & safe campaigns here. But i didn’t mean you denied my requested things, i just say that you considered such campaigns which offers signature category. Honestly speaking, didn’t know about these rules before requested you to add my own selected campaign.

Quote from: Denongels on May 04, 2020, 09:31:35 PM

Quote from: Fortunecook on May 04, 2020, 11:06:15 AM

Again you are avoiding on purpose my request! I have nothing more to say then that your project is complete scam and it should not be trusted by anyone.

I trust Leasehold more than you because if this is a scam I don't think Lisk will be stupid to promote this project and this is one of the proofs Lisk Promote Leasehold https://twitter.com/LiskHQ/status/1252912440708419584?s=20

Exactly, i am also supported Leasehold project to see behind the significant role from LISK project, they proudly advertising by backed LISK ecosystem. And firstly i was confused about their big partnership booking.com and i asked in this thread, than provided partnership agreement. Now scam accusation is created aganist it, they should clarify instead of accusation.

Right now some countries scenario are changing gradually, they almost overcome this pandemic situation after lose thousands of people’s. Also corona virus affected in online job platform but still here people getting work but another job sectors is collapsed, so that also new people’s trying to make skills in online.

Quote from: Finestream on May 10, 2020, 09:09:25 AM

Quote from: nikki4 on May 10, 2020, 08:12:35 AM

Actually I have no reason but I think this exchange has high security than others exchange. Even this exchange all volume is definitely legit. You will see that p2pb2b, vindax or Latoken etc exchange has fake volume so you can't sell your high amount tokens.

High security? No...

They were hacked last year. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-08/crypto-exchange-giant-binance-reports-a-hack-of-7-000-bitcoin

They lost $40 million USD worth of bitcoin that time, but they were able to survive because they are a profitable exchange and no traders complain that they lose their money, so that's the reason why they are still here now, in fact they were able to introduce their insurance system that time as they have been setting aside funds to cover loses like this.

I disagreed of you, at least you can say that binance providing highest security to all of another exchanges, a multiple times hacked some high liquidity exchanges even those are claim equivalent quality of Binance, when traders lost their tokens. But Binance is different an example, traders assets was safe by backed of Binance own fund.

Quote from: Crypto_lion on May 10, 2020, 09:05:36 AM

Ideally stable coins are usually backed by physical nassets equal to the value of them in circulation so that they can safeguard the holders against the volatility of the crypto markets.

Which assets backed by these stable coins i did not heard ever. Even though a lot of contradictory are behind all of such coins. These can support in the bear market to replacing in safe place, it’s a potential role of stable coins, without this case i don’t see other usefulness in the market.

I have not experienced all of these coins without 0X coin, it will keep to hold long term, although of those are top altcoins in CMC, for the largest trading volumes looks tempting, otherwise there are nothing real cases. Another thing these are overrated project, so it wouldn’t recommended and i'm doubted for long term investment.

Quote from: Santri on May 06, 2020, 08:32:49 AM

Quote from: JHORN on May 05, 2020, 12:54:20 PM

julerz12 and bubbalex, they always make sure that bounty hunters get paid no matter what, this is what I called good bounty managers

I disagree with this because of the two managers that you mentioned ever,not pay bounty participant even they also once managed scam project

I found a scam project these one conducted by julerz12 bm. If participated most of bounty, i appreciated the way of escrow (protected bounty hunters rewards). It’s correct he managed few failed projects in the several times. But these are made rewards. I never heard bubbalex managed projects were deceived.