BTC sounds better, ISO should adopt what people use not the other way around...
Agreed. I don't much care what ISO says. For those discontent with the reception, here's a workaround: [color=transparent]X[/color][btc]
This produces the text XBTC, which is not optimal but still better than BTC. Does it? XBTC
|
|
|
awesome! I think this is the kind of post that is being referred to..
|
|
|
ASIC will be compatible only if the hash function(SHA256 currently) does not change.
It might change in the future with a new block version if there are any weaknesses in dual step SHA256, but for the next decade, most likely not.
|
|
|
How would it work exactly? Let's say there's two chains:
Block A - 210kb -> Block B - 300kb -> Block C - 582kb
versus
Block A - 210kb -> Block D - 175kb
Doesn't sound like it'll work well.
|
|
|
How does that happen? Fat fingers? :)
|
|
|
What is the problem with using paid templates? It's not very professional, but it doesn't mean this is a scam.
|
|
|
Will you be able to access my box.net account afterwards?
|
|
|
Money pak trader will be removed from my list. I think he is trust worthy. I have been watching him for months.
Tomatocage will you let me know when you update your list? can you just post added or removed with the names and link and I will edit my list based on that
Why are you using someone else's list and claiming it to be your own?
|
|
|
Also, make sure to send an anonymous tip to the FBI for money laundering I have no respect for people like MoneyPakTrader who scam using scammer accusations. It's like false rape accusations. When and how MoneyPakTrader.com scammed TradeFortress? I'm starting to think you're a sock puppet. I'm sure you think of everyone disagreeing with you as a sockpuppet, right? Especially when you're trying to earn from TradeFortress's money? There's so many people trying to take advantage of each other - not just in the bitcoin economy. This 'accusation' hits close to home for me - a year ago, I did significant design work for a friend of a friend. After a few months, she wanted the money back because she didn't like what I made. Being that we haven't done it formally, I just shrugged and refunded her under the condition she won't my work, but a bit later I check her website and she hired someone to recreate what I did. The same situation is happening here - MoneyPakTrader.com appears to be wanting to find another developer due to the bitcoin price rally. The fact that MoneyPakTrader wants a full refund makes me know his true intentions.
|
|
|
Yawn.. anything happened?
|
|
|
I am not in control of it. The community makes and verifies the claims.
Then take tradefortress off the list. This +1. This +2. TF is not a scammer at all. This +3. Nobody is going to take anything you say seriously - because you are not serious. There's nothing wrong with scammer lists, but this particular implementation is hilariously sad. Especially with this: Thanks I will review it and post it. I think this is my favorite so far: This IS a good old boys club. This "contract" has ZERO force of law. Legally they could all just walk away with the forum donations. Just because you want to handle it in the community doesn't mean you should write a contract with no teeth and eliminate your OPTION for legal action. Also they get paid monthly fees, WTF is that? Plenty of people are willing to do it without charge. This looks to me like a jerking of the circular variety.
+1 really I think that theymos and the rest need to be added to the pending scammer list. I think I might put a poll about this and see how others feel. Hehe, I don't know why anyone pays attention to this now. You donated to the forum. Donate. You're not a shareholder, you're not getting your coins back.
|
|
|
And it just got better. I just set it to live update every 15 seconds showing any new trades. So you can just sit and watch the trades slide by. Depending on server load I may move this up or down as time goes by. Wow, nice! Maybe even MtGox live style graphs for popular assets?
|
|
|
Take this as a sort of security drill: MPEx is untouchable.
uh huh... whatever you say, kid. Redirecting DDoS traffic to a government site is poetry. Redirect or DNS change? I don't think dos-bots follow redirects. Yeah, unless the DDoS consisted of an iframe and a timer it didn't really serve any purpose other than the lol factor. I'm surprised how MPOE prices haven't being affected much, but that's pretty offtopic so I'll stop here :)
|
|
|
If you want to argue word for word about it, he said "I propose", not "I will".
|
|
|
Also, make sure to send an anonymous tip to the FBI for money laundering :)
I have no respect for people like MoneyPakTrader who scam using scammer accusations. It's like false rape accusations.
|
|
|
I am not in control of it. The community makes and verifies the claims.
Then take tradefortress off the list. This +1. This +2. TF is not a scammer at all. This +3. Nobody is going to take anything you say seriously - because you are not serious. There's nothing wrong with scammer lists, but this particular implementation is hilariously sad. Especially with this: Thanks I will review it and post it.
|
|
|
But still paid on a weekly basis correct? I understand shares are meant to be investing in the company but just trying to gage potential value of ASICMiner shares from mid to long term.
Thanks for any and all insightful replies.
Yes, the dividends are weekly. How many shares do Bitfountain hold? I thought it was only 50%?
|
|
|
Meanwhile, S.DICE is back at their IPO price. Investors didn't really lose any money in USD terms however.
That is not accurate. IPO prices were .0037 and below. At the highest USD exchange rate of about $12. So, IPO prices were around $0.0444 per share. Current prices are .0048 at around $47 or about $0.2256 per share. So I am not sure how you are pricing the shares to get the IPO price as neither the BTC nor USD price is anywhere close to the IPO price. It was at 0.0035 when I posted that message. Still a gain in USD terms, but not BTC at that time.
|
|
|
|