 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
I know a bit about software development myself. I also know that the "testnet" as present in many coins (including Gulden) is artificial. It's good for one stage of testing, but afterwards you'll have to test it again in an separate main network (few VPSes that only connect to each other would suffice).
Malcolm has complety changed how testnet works for Gulden, to make sure all kinds of situations (and PoW2 phase) can be tested. It's far more advanced than "testnet" of other coins. So please make sure you are informed before you make such blunt statements. Perhaps you'd better wait until you at least know about stuff yourself before you "correct" a legendary member that has been here since 2010? Not that Biomike needs defense, but let me ask you this. If Malcolm perfected the testing methods into something so advanced, how come the extremely over delayed 2.0 release that was tested and tested and tested even more, resulted in a chainsplit and stalled blockchain for over 36 hours? Perhaps an indication you need to think a bit more before you barf like a chiwawa? But you also contradict yourself here bud: The fork was not an issue. That's just how this update work. From phase 3 miners that keep on mining with the outdated software will just continue to mine for nothing and waste their energy. Only the stall of the main network was a problem, but that's being handled. Some things just can't be tested in testnet.
Malcolm has complety changed how testnet works for Gulden, to make sure all kinds of situations (and PoW2 phase) can be tested. It's far more advanced than "testnet" of other coins.
So please make sure you are informed before you make such blunt statements.
You said one thing about yourself I agree with though: So please make sure you are informed before you make such blunt statements.
Hahaha. You are such a joke. No, you don't have to defend the mighty legendary biomike. You can't even defend him because everyone knows you only talk bullsh!t. Do you even have any Gulden left? Or is it still all on Safecex and Yobit? Sucker!  Nope. I'm so poor. And I cry in my bed all the time. But thanks to you I still have a laugh once in a while. |
|
|
|
I know a bit about software development myself. I also know that the "testnet" as present in many coins (including Gulden) is artificial. It's good for one stage of testing, but afterwards you'll have to test it again in an separate main network (few VPSes that only connect to each other would suffice).
Malcolm has complety changed how testnet works for Gulden, to make sure all kinds of situations (and PoW2 phase) can be tested. It's far more advanced than "testnet" of other coins. So please make sure you are informed before you make such blunt statements. Perhaps you'd better wait until you at least know about stuff yourself before you "correct" a legendary member that has been here since 2010? Not that Biomike needs defense, but let me ask you this. If Malcolm perfected the testing methods into something so advanced, how come the extremely over delayed 2.0 release that was tested and tested and tested even more, resulted in a chainsplit and stalled blockchain for over 36 hours? Perhaps an indication you need to think a bit more before you barf like a chiwawa? But you also contradict yourself here bud: The fork was not an issue. That's just how this update work. From phase 3 miners that keep on mining with the outdated software will just continue to mine for nothing and waste their energy. Only the stall of the main network was a problem, but that's being handled. Some things just can't be tested in testnet.
Malcolm has complety changed how testnet works for Gulden, to make sure all kinds of situations (and PoW2 phase) can be tested. It's far more advanced than "testnet" of other coins.
So please make sure you are informed before you make such blunt statements.
You said one thing about yourself I agree with though: So please make sure you are informed before you make such blunt statements.
Hahaha. You are such a joke. No, you don't have to defend the mighty legendary biomike. You can't even defend him because everyone knows you only talk bullsh!t. |
|
|
|
I know a bit about software development myself. I also know that the "testnet" as present in many coins (including Gulden) is artificial. It's good for one stage of testing, but afterwards you'll have to test it again in an separate main network (few VPSes that only connect to each other would suffice).
Malcolm has complety changed how testnet works for Gulden, to make sure all kinds of situations (and PoW2 phase) can be tested. It's far more advanced than "testnet" of other coins. So please make sure you are informed before you make such blunt statements. |
|
|
|
Wow, the perfectly tested update didn't trigger perfectly.
Wow, very mature reaction Myckel. |
|
|
|
Chain stuck and forked right after phase3 came in action! Glad they didn’t release it before they made sure it was perfect  The fork was not an issue. That's just how this update work. From phase 3 miners that keep on mining with the outdated software will just continue to mine for nothing and waste their energy. Only the stall of the main network was a problem, but that's being handled. Some things just can't be tested in testnet. |
|
|
|
Respect MaNI Respect. I could only dream of having the knowledge you do about the blockchain. Count me in as a witness, is 10000 coins the minimum required?
Dash masternode copy!!!!! Damn how foolish are you Gulden con lovers 😂 Did you even take the time to read the whitepaper? Dash has introduced an ‘instant payment’ that is supposedly secure, it uses
a system of ‘master nodes’ to handle the instant payment. The ’master nodes’
act as an extra control layer on top of the network, communicating among one
another. The problem is that in order to function these ’master nodes’ must
either act in a centralised way or must solve the same problems that make
a blockchain necessary in the first place. It follows reason and is speculated
that there are likely a variety of ways in which such a system can be attacked,
however, I have yet to find a proper analysis showing the details necessary to
determine this. For the sake of brevity, I won’t go into much more detail on
this concept except to say that the lack of proof that master nodes can in fact
function as claimed is enough to rule them out as a serious solution for now
from a Gulden perspective. |
|
|
|
They call it Gulden 2.0, not 'blockchain 2.0' nevertheless I think it earns that title as it adds a lot of new, unique and interesting features. Especially for the targetgroup that Gulden has in mind in the long-term: normal people. I'm happy with the steady progress Gulden has made over the past year. I'm very curious how Gulden 2.0 and the EUR-NLG exchanges are going to take effect on the coin  I'm holding for a long time, that's one thing I'm sure of! Totaly agree. And to call it only "a workaround" for some problems is a shame. The things Malcolm came up with aren't workarounds but real solutions. |
|
|
|
Something to read on the kindle when I get home from work. Won't make any comments yet.
Bottom line. PoW block is signed by a selected node (in a sort of PoS fashion) before accepted in the chain. The signing node can add transactions to the block. So instead of one miner, you have now two miners per block. It's something to work around some of the Blockchain problems, but calling it "Blockchain 2.0" is IMHO a bit of a far fetch. And it is something to have the centralised signing node, run by the dev team, removed. Did you read a different whitepaper? They don't call it "Blockchain 2.0" |
|
|
|
|
I just noticed Yaamp has logged in to bitcointalk on August 22, 2016, 08:13:14 PM.
So he is still around somewhere.
What's up Yaamp. Are you going to make sure everyone is getting their coins back?
|
|
|
|
I have funds of my own stuck in the wallets too, and I am somewhat bored and trying to figure out what has happened, and in some way willing to have the funds back into my control, altough I personally think that whenever I trust someone else my coins, I am assuming the risk of them falling out of my control, I would rarely try to enforce someone else's law.
It is just my personal opinion that trying to figure out what the hell happened to the persons involved, as I car more about this than I care about money.
I don't mean to upset or try to minimize the importance others give to their funds. The two persons who were moderators of the safecex chatbox, me and the one with the forum in crypto city, never had direct access to any wallets of the site's source code or hosting, that left exclusively to yaamp and therefore being his/her/theirs sole responsibility.
Also therefore my concerns about yaamp's whereabouts, because to find him/her/them is to retrieve access to whatever we would want to have access regarding safecex.
Did you find out anything about the disappearance of Yaamp already? |
|
|
|
|
I also want my NLG back. But Yaamp is nowhere to find.
Does anyone know where he is?
|
|
|
|
|
Does no one care about their lost coins? Where the F did Yaamp went to?
|
|
|
|
|
I am wondering the same. Where is YAAMP?
|
|
|
|
|
No sign of Yaamp yet. He hasn't sign in to BCT since May 13th and Safecex is still offline.
|
|
|
|
It would make me sad if someone comes up in the twitter account telling that has given up trying to put stuff back together.
I offered help already, I have no idea what's the size of the problem @yaamp is facing.
It would make you "sad"? If this is the end of Safecex, Yaamp should at least make sure everyone can withdraw his coins. It's a shame he is quiet for such a long time. He should apologize for this situation and tell what's going on. |
|
|
|
|
If Yaamp doesn't have bad intentions, he would have let us know what's going on.
The facts are:
1. He does not respond to support tickets.
2. Withdrawal was almost impossible last weeks.
3. He hasn't been around for two weeks now.
4. Safecex is offline without any notice.
This smells like shit.
|
|
|
|
|
Does someone know who this Yaamp is? Let's try to find this scumbag (or is it scambag).
|
|
|
|
|
Safecex is down. Goodbye coins.
|
|
|
|
|
Safecex is gone. Say bye bye to your coins.
|
|
|
|
|
Warning: Do not use Safecex!
There is no admin around, only some chat mods. They don't respond to support tickets.
People can't withdraw their coins, or just a limited amount.
Repeat: Do not use Safecex!
|
|
|
|
|
