That's good that this reminder has been set in place. As for exemple, I don't have a valid working email address. Until when can I create one ?
|
|
|
I experienced that inability to log into the forum from about 1PM GMT to 3 PM. I seems to be back now. Did we had confirmation that ur is a DDoS ?
|
|
|
I have the exact other feeling. I have never seen the forum that active. Just look the number of threads that popped after ZCash being released.
|
|
|
I tested on several devices with different browsers and I can see signatures just fine while not logged in.
I can confirm the same as well. Both signature & forum ads are visible while not logged in. Only trust is not shown. Exactly, I just tested it and I see no problem. That's weird that you're not seeing it.
|
|
|
because it's not very informative for anyone seeking an username in it.
ctrl->f usually does the job. Well, you're right, that works. However, for someone that likes to review who's in, a sorted list would be more effective.
|
|
|
The idea is good, and moreover is your list that is sorted alphabetically. If I have time I'll do the same to Lauda's list, because it's not very informative for anyone seeking an username in it.
|
|
|
I've just saw some guy that has a rank lower than Full Member. That's not the first time, but it's happening more and more. Has this funtion been enabled for everyone ?
In theory, if full member uploads avatar and then deletes enough of his own posts - wouldnt the avatar also stay ? And due to deletion of posts under 120 they would be shown as lower membership than FM. Just a thought on what may have happened. It's probably the reason, because I don't remember that that account was old enough to enter under the description of longbob72. If I ever find it back, I'll give the final word here.
|
|
|
I've just saw some guy that has a rank lower than Full Member. That's not the first time, but it's happening more and more. Has this funtion been enabled for everyone ?
|
|
|
It should be totally disabled, for whatever rank it is. Ads are annoying, as it is said, and it brings money to the forum. They need it (well, there's also a lot of wasted money too) to make it run smoothly.
If ads are disabled bitcointalk wouldn't still be running today due to the high operating costs. Unless the forum receives enough donations to cover the operating costs ads should not be disabled cause it will negatively impact the forum.
It should be totally disabled, for whatever rank it is. Ads are annoying, as it is said, and it brings money to the forum.
It is still forum's staff good will to allow us to disable ADS at all. Only obnoxiously overdone and aggressive ADS are annoying. Bitcointalk's banner is not annoying at all. I never disabled it and I never will if it will remains in its current state. You didn't got my point. I said that the option to disable them should be disabled for whatever rank. Edit : I've put "are" instead of "aren't" my bad . I understand now why you didn't got the sense of my sentence.
|
|
|
It should be totally disabled, for whatever rank it is. Ads are annoying, as it is said, and it brings money to the forum. They need it (well, there's also a lot of wasted money too) to make it run smoothly.
|
|
|
I don't think so. Those topics are discussing Bitcoin, so they have their place here. It has now the same function as the new "Gambling discussion" section.
|
|
|
Another case of such a treatement is user Abou Talha that received negative trusts for his avatar. Thought it's true that it is a bit explanatory about the guy, it is nowhere prohibited.
|
|
|
I don't see this as a potential good idea for several reasons :
-too much work for them, which is the main reason -possible conflicts of interest -decrease the quality of the experience since there might have delays and such, making instamine even more common
|
|
|
Beside that milestone that it will represent and which I'll be able to see in live, I'm not that excited.
|
|
|
Faucets give satoshis against brain time. Ponzis pay the old investors by the new's money. That's a pyramidal scheme.
|
|
|
Do not forget the possibility of Satoshi to be a group of person or a group made of Samsung, Toshiba, Nakamichi and Motorola !
|
|
|
I believe that at the moment there are only rumors about who might possibly be Satoshi Nakamoto On December 8, 2015 Gizmodo reported that Dave Kleiman may have been involved in the invention of bitcoin based on information uncovered in several leaked documents.
The Economist article had Craig Steven Wright claiming he (under the pseudonym of Satoshi Nakamoto) and Dave Kleiman were behind the invention of bitcoin. Look https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_KleimanIf it says that he is the co-inventor of Bitcoin beside Craig Wright, you can tell you that he isn't. The Aussie is not Satoshi Nakamoto.
|
|
|
i bid 0.023 i want to take this account if is still available, when was registerd ? was enroled to any signature comp. ? thank you
|
|
|
Bendigo Bank has launched a new online share trading platform Bendigo Invest Direct (BID) as the company continues to work on improving customer service by making technology investments. According to the bank, more than 10,000 customers have transitioned off the former legacy share trading platform and onto BID, which was built in partnership with CMC Markets Stockbroking. Customers now have access to stock analytics, ASX unlisted managed funds, upcoming dividend distributions, live and historic company news, and live ASX announcements. There is also a mobile version of the platform, which the bank claims gives investors the ability to trade wherever and whenever. BID project sponsor Matt Smith said initial feedback from customers has been positive. "BID is all about confidence, providing customers with the market leading research, sophisticated analytics tools, and speed they need to execute trades as they identify opportunities," he said. The launch comes after the bank reported during its half year 2016 financial results that technology investments it continued to make as part of its Base II Advanced Accreditation progressed well. It made enhancements to data, decision making processing, and risk and return measurements. http://www.zdnet.com/article/bendigo-bank-invests-in-new-trading-platform-technology/
|
|
|
BitPay introduced one potential fork of Bitcoin Core in a series of blog posts by CEO Stephen Pair. In the series, Pair describes an “adaptive block-size limit.” Pair expressed his belief on the Medium post’s that he believes Bitcoin does not need a fixed limit, though that would create uncertainty for miners. Pair believes there can be a “hard limit” – the maximum block size – and a “soft limit,” which miners could increase or decrease if they want. The soft limit will be the default limit for miners to create blocks. As Pair lays out in the fourth and final essay in a series: At BitPay, we will experiment with this approach. We will perform back testing to analyze what impact various settings might have on historic blocks. We will also analyze behavior under extreme circumstances and critique it from a game theoretic perspective. https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitpay-core-coming-soon-for-bitcoin-blockchain/
|
|
|
|