Your math is off. The missiles cost the US 832,000 USD each. With 23 misses that cost the american tax payer 19 million.. OUCH! Can thus Trump decided to dispose of the old rocket shelf life which came to an end. Maybe that's why so many missiles had hit the target? On the one hand, adults and children were killed with the help of chemical weapons, so retaliation had to come, and on the other hand geopolitical influence on the region. We should not look at what happened at the moment, but why it started and continues to this day with the participation of Russia and the United States. This is the protection of their interests and money does not play a role here. |
|
|
|
Don't kill Muslims. Kill Islam. Islam is a governmental religion that the vast majority of Muslims do not follow even close to correctly. Islam is a religion of violence. But most Muslims and Muslim clerics have already almost destroyed it by turning it into a religion of peace. Help Muslims kill Islam the rest of the way by freeing them from the violent requirements of their religion. Don't kill the Muslims. Rather, help the Muslims kill Islam the rest of the way.  I doubt the religion can be killed. Many said Christianity would die out but it seems to be seeing a resurgence. What we should be doing is help them get through their own "reformation" if that is even possible. Granted, Reformation really didn't eliminate religion being problematic (just look at Protestant vs Catholic conflicts in the past) but it's a start. Weaken the hold of the clergy over the smallfolk. Reformation would also allow a flourishing of new sects. Considering that most people are moderate anyway, they'd probably go along with moderate sects and there might be more moderate sects to begin with. When religion have to compete in the free market of faith, they adapt to the people rather than force the people to submit to their will. My reasoning is very simple. I don't want to live near Muslims. Not all of them may be terrorists or terrorist supporters, but the vast majority of the terrorists are Muslims. My logic is that, prevention is better than cure. Why take the risk?
BTW... I don't want to kill any of them, as long as they don't attack me.
I also don't want to live near them. Not that I believe they are all bad but their level of tribal mentality is disturbing. You're always worrying you might offend someone. And it's not like I would be able to live near them in the first place. They tend to form ghettos which in time become a no-go for infidels. You forget that it is hard to enslave a person. In the soul of everyone will fury rage and when it flashes. And some resist all their lives. Therefore, we should not even talk about destroying Muslims or Islam. This desire can be the whole world. |
|
|
|
The next nuclear use as a weapon will probably be by a small group with a very good cause, unless governments start cleaning up their acts.
It is almost impossible for the marginal and fringe groups to obtain or assemble nuclear weapons. It needs advanced technological know-how in several sectors. That is why less than 10 nations own nuclear weapons right now. But then, I am worried by the possession of nuclear weapons by countries such as Pakistan and North Korea. No one can predict what the rulers of these countries will do in the future. Perhaps the greatest limiter on the proliferation of nukes is the limited interest among the general public in astronomy, ironically the one thing that would make nuclear proliferation less dangerous... / Why are you so sure about this? Is the way to the races will solve the problem of the world nuclear arsenal, which for the same reason will destroy the whole earth. And the planet has nothing to expect from the searches in the races. |
|
|
|
Out of the normal relaxed atheism, as it used to be, we seams to have a growing branch of a special "atheists" that act as much as the next religious fanatic!
This "special atheists", pretty much common at US, so we can call them "American Atheists" (or AA) act like if they can't live without strict good and evil, they uphold their beliefs as it were the supreme truth, like to call it facts and often scientific facts to things science doesn't even come close to, such as human philosophic affairs.
Let's then start to examine this "new religion":
- It's mostly based on "studies" from "experts".
As result there are now thousands of concurrent "studies", most without any scientific value at all (sample too small, bias interpretation of data, non-repeatability, and so on) and paradoxical to its peers, and here, as religious do, they cherry pick the "studies" they found convenient to their belief.
- Anyone denying "MY" facts is an idiot.
The "supreme morality" of the group makes them so wise... It looks like they don't believe there's no God, but instead there's a job vacancy for being God and they want to apply for it.
- If you're not with us, then you're against us!
This is common ground to religious fanatics, they deal quite harshly to any criticism on their views. Moderation is out of the scope.
- The Dogma
The so called harmful part of religions isn't their crosses, crescents, yin-yangs or whatever symbols they use, isn't also praying - praying is somewhat the psychologist of the poor -, but the dogma: The incontestable truths they are meant to react violently if challenged! And in here, the AA's have a LOT of them!
Some are taking just as "to look opposite of what they recognize as their opponents", for AA's this means Christians, such as being "pro-choice", others are plain bull as feminism, lgbt rights, free-for-all economics and so on...
It won't surprise me that in a short these groups start to resource terrorism.
This is one of the more peculiar arguments I’ve ever come across. It is an argument usually levied once a theist posits that God is required for the existence of the universe (an absolute being upon which all other things exist by way of contingency). Some atheists then shift the weight over to the theist saying, “Well then who created God?” This very familiar argument demonstrates a failure to understand what almost any form of classical theism understands by the name “God”. Speaking for Christianity, God is the One who is – i.e., the only One who is the source of His own being. He is worshiped as the uncreated One who always was and always will be. God is not seen by the Christian as one more being in the total aggregate of all beings in the universe. Rather He is the source and ground of all being, of all existence .One way to say it, though it might sound odd at first, is that Christians do not believe that God ever came into existence (Kierkegaard). Think of it in the old ‘Cosmological Argument’ sense. Whatever begins to exist must have a cause. The universe began to exist, therefore it had a cause. But God never began to exist; He always was, i.e., eternal. The atheist will typically respond with, “who cares what you assert about God, it still does not answer the question.” And this is a great example of the moment when atheists and Christians begin to talk past one another. For the Christian the question is purely nonsensical, for the atheist it’s pure logical fallacy. However, you don't have to be a Christian. And you don't really have to be a theist in the religion sense of the word. You can be anybody, and still see that nobody has enough knowledge to say truthfully and factually that God doesn't exist someplace, somehow, somewhere in the universe... and even on earth, possibly. By this alone, the idea of atheism is, at best, a foolish religion. Now, if atheism meant simply that you didn't think that God existed, but that you understood that He (She/It) might exist, then atheism would be completely logical. As it is, atheism is silly, and its people are a bit warped to even acknowledge atheism. Believing in something that is physically provable is a logical position. Believing in imaginary, unreal, out of this world nonsense is irrational. Believing that your imaginary friend is real is just being delusional. Hearing him/her is a symptom of schizophrenia. If a person rejects faith in everything with his whole being, then it seems to me that it is very difficult to explain something and do not have to do it at all. God is not a friend and nobody imagines him. This, we can say, energy, everything that chills us and the whole universe in general. |
|
|
|
Jacob Zuma has been known to be corrupt for a very long time now, no wonder Thabo Mbeki tried but failed to stop him from becoming the leader of the ANC. He should be impeached for all sorts of things he did like using state money to renovate his personal abode.
He is still supported by a lot of the top ANC officials, because he was the one who expanded the ANC's base in to KwaZulu-Natal by decimating the Inkatha Freedom Party (Zuma is also a Zulu). The non-Zulu African ethnic groups (Xhosa, Sotho, Tsonga.etc) also tolerate him to an extent, although they are not very excited about the choice. To us, all the circumstances seem very distorted, and local people perceive and see everything differently, what they have in the country. So either they were forced to make today's choice or this is their natural choice. And then we must take it as it should. |
|
|
|
They just tried to cause trouble here in the Philippines, in a province farther away from the small Muslim-majority area. http://news.abs-cbn.com/news/04/11/17/hundreds-of-boholanos-leave-homes-due-to-abu-sayyaf-afp-clash I would like to tell Europeans that they should just try to prevent them from coming in but that would be impossible at this point. Again, we are not saying all Muslims are bad but something should really be done to deter them from committing violence. My suggestions for Europe: 1. Recent immigrants (those that came during the Syria and Iraq civil war, as well as those that came from North Africa around the same time) would be immediately deported after committing crime or inciting violence. 2. 2nd and 3rd generation immigrants (anyone not native of Europe) will have their families deported with them if they committed violence or has been proven to join a terrorist group abroad. 3. If terrorist and family are already naturalized citizens (in which case it might be complicated to just kick them out and/or revoke citizenship), then the family loses welfare. Hopefully if they know their family will also suffer the consequences of their actions, they might think twice before going out and shooting at people. Unless they also happen to hate their families. Maybe this will reduce the number of the Real Housewives of ISIS. It is necessary to punish not only those who commit crimes, but also those who push or provoke crimes. Then no one will have the desire to commit unlawful acts. Europe has already given so many things to many peoples, and they shit into the well from which they drink. |
|
|
|
Still makes no sense killing people for eating/killing cows.
Those are isolated incidents. During the last three decades, less than 10 people have been killed in India for cow-slaughter. The number of Hindus killed by Muslims in Bangladesh during the same period is almost 10,000 times that number, but no one mentions about it. The Indian media is under the control of evangelical christian cabals, and whenever they get a chance to tarnish the Hindu majority, they make the maximum use out of it. Probably all the inhabitants of Europe are in danger, because they consider it to be more useful meat than pork. Therefore, meat of cattle is very popular there. But if the Hindus kill for this, then you need to be careful. Muslims kill those who eat pork, and the Indians of those who kill the cow. |
|
|
|
If you are looking for a short term plan investment then bitcoin is the way to go. But in the opposite if you are looking for a long term plan then gold is quite safe for this. Usually investing in gold is for long term of 10 years minimum. Also the ROI can be higher with bitcoin, considering the lengh of your plan. If i was going to choose, I would choose to mix both. Remember the golden rule, don't put all your eggs in the same shoes
I always trusted more that I can hold in my hands or see with my own eyes. Based on this personal rule, I believe that bitcoin is a means for earning, and gold is a means for investing earned money. The fact is that gold in any case will be in your pocket, and bitcoin has a risk. |
|
|
|
The dollar is used for criminal activities because the dollar is an internationnal currency wich everyone use to sell/Trade ect internationnally. So yep the dollar is part of this crimminal activity, but it's surely not the only one.... and can't be blamed for this either...
Once asked the question, what will be done with bitcoin, if there will be substitutions in criminal activity. So if the dollar is fine, then bitcoin will not suffer. But only the dollar is controlled at full capacity and there is no bitcoin. |
|
|
|
I don't have any strategy. There some people using the "HOLD" strategy but I am the opposite, i use the "SPEND" strategy  Because I spend everything I get. As it's easy to spend your bitcoin, specially with a debt card, and as I always find something to buy , like a dress or shoes. I am hardly able to keep my BTC for a long time. Usually I keep until i have enough to buy something i want. I am like this in real life with fiat as well, spend spend spend !! So almost all users live and earn this way. It is necessary to have very good basic income so that bitcoin is left alone until better times. But today life is such that money is always not enough, so bitcoin spends everything. |
|
|
|
Some day in the future, you will realize that the best time to invest was not today, but some other day in the future, when prices were low. But with the information that you have today, the best time to invest is still today, because you do not know when prices will be low, and you do know that the longer you hold your investment, the more time it has to grow.
Toughts?
In a way you are correct, since there is no point in worrying about what it was we need to worry about what we can do now, but at the same time you don’t want to buy when the price is at the top because then it will be difficult to obtain any profits at all. Yeah its never smart idea to buy when price is high as it will kill your profits and its always good to buy when price drops and sell them when price goes higher and that is the best way to make profits and most of the traders are making profits in the same way. Most traders, if they collect a large number of bitcoins, they can safely influence the market of crypto-currencies, and at the same time creating fluctuations in the exchange rate, betting the course of bitcoins, and profiting from it. |
|
|
|
Hello, I would like to ask if anyone knows for a good way to invest Bitcoins? I am very interested in purchasing shares of a startups, something like bnktothefuture, but with lower minimums. I am currently active on BTCjam, but I would like to invest in startups too not just loans. Thanks  I think the best thing investment that you must do is, why not try to buy some potential altcoins were you can make a profit so fast via trading in the exchange site platform here is the coinmarketcap.com choose an altcoin which you are going to invest, in between top 10 altcoins. The problem is too difficult for choose the right altcoin which is have a lot of the potential to be the big altcoin in the future. No one can predict that which altcoin will pump in coming days and that makes altcoin trading very risky and you cannot invest in any coin blindly and depending on luck that its price will pump and you would be making huge profits from it as generally it never happens. There is something called a research before investing and if you cannot afford to invest your time in doing a research then you will never make any profits in any type of investment and no one will risk their money by investing it randomly. In investing about chance, even speech can not be. How can you wield money somewhere, which you are not sure or doubt. It's just not just wrong, but it's crazy. I face the issue very strongly and multilaterally before I put my savings. |
|
|
|
а у тебя есть девушка?
нет!
почему?
жена не разрешает...
Гы. гы. Мысля хорошая, я именно так и поступаю всегда - если уж случается оказия и получается завести себе девушку на какое то время, стараюсь это сделать так, что бы жена не узнала. А то ведь... не разрешит.  Интересно, все жены такие злые что не разрешают завести девушку или есть добрые которые разрешают Не все, на востоке многоженство им там некуда деваться, приходится разрешать, да их никто и не спрашивает) на востоке закон разрешает иметь больше жен, если муж способен и имеет средства чтобы содержать этих жен и их детей. Да и если посмотреть на законы шариата, то женщина это практически рабыня или кусок мяса. Я просто был в шоке, когда получил чуть больше информации о их жизни. |
|
|
|
Запланировал в субботу покатить на речку тарань потягать, начал подготовку заранее, у заядлых рыбаков узнал маршруты и тайные тропы к местам рыбным и тихим, накрутил снастей всевозможных под реку, завтра куплю про запас "убийцу карася" и полная боевая готовность.
нужно поспешить с таким занятием, а то уже с 1 апреля будет действовать весенний запрет на вылов рыбы. Можно попасть хорошо. Как говорится те что тоннами ловит, того предупреждают., а за пару кило могут дом отобрать. |
|
|
|
Всемирные заговоры, закрытые сверх технологии и прочие наши домыслы, это всего лиш домыслы. Даже если что то и есть то я очень сомневаюсь что информация проскакивает. А все что можно найти на просторах интернета это всего лиш утка за счет которнй ее создатель пытается поднять свое ЧСВ.
А может эти слухи правда, просто иногда когда говоришь правду никто не верит и думает примерно как ты что вряд ли такая информация будет проскакивать На самом деле прогресс не остановить и это радует, исследования ведут как любители так и серьёзные организации например вот чем занимается НАСА https://geektimes.ru/post/282800/ так что ещё лет надцать и каждый сможет купить гравицапу в кредит так уже многие наверное начинают собираться на пмж на орбитальную станцию которую планируют построить в ближайшие годы, и которая будет вмещать в себя 10 млн людей. Согласитесь, что задумка не хилая. |
|
|
|
|
Promising project really. Joined signature campaign.
|
|
|
|
Все зависит от качества наушников от человеческого организма, знакомый работает 6 лет оператором в колл-цетре, где работа связана с наушниками плюс пока добираешься на работу и с работы тоже в наушниках, на слух не жалуется.
это действительно так и главное чтобы они не были вакуумными, а то проблем действительно не избежать. Те что профессионально работают, то конечно пользуются очень хорошими и качественными наушниками. |
|
|
|
|
Посмотрел все сезоны Сыны Анархии. Очень хороший сериал. Если не заморачиваться относительно некоторого перебора в убийствах, то в основном сюжет держит в напряжении на протяжении всех серий и всех семи сезонов. Жду возможного продолжения.
|
|
|
|
|
Ребята а что не говори, именно луной лучше красоваться чем солнцем, хотя всем нравится лето и солнечные теплые дни. А луна притягивает взгляды всегда и в любую пору года.
|
|
|
|
этот куховой прибор
Куха это место где готовят гречу с курой? возможно человек ошибся и хотел написать слово кухонный? Потому что слово Куха у немцев это название старинного пирога, а в индийской вере Куху значит начало или половой орган. Как то к кухни не очень подходит. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
