Why not include the rest of the world? Maybe the first who implement some blockchain stuff will be some low/poor county with less overmanipulated gov. I see a lot of action going around in America Latina, maybe Colombia take the first position  |
|
|
|
I highly doubt ethereum will have staking anytime soon, there are too many things they need to consider to build something like that, any ICO that gets funded with ETH will have a chance to stake and make profit with customers money without selling any ETH at least will think about twice before selling ETH and that will effect the price well however people who have ETH would have to send their already staking ETH to some ICO and lose the interest there which would make ICO's a second option and as ICO King eth has to decide which one they want to support the founders of the ICO's or the investors of ICO's. Considering all of this is a community hype thing I would suggest supporting the investors instead of supporting founders. Which means staking would have to benefit the small investor over big ones somehow.
interesting comment. Never took this viewpoint before, its curious, and a bit brain hurting In any case,u can use you gained ETH to invest without lossing your staking right? |
|
|
|
|
I think you are right, somehow this innovative alternative will affect the big players out there,
I believe OpenBazar or Particl annon market will have a big impact on how we (we) do business online.
To see some creative creators selling goods over there will be amazing!! Soon I want to sell some homemade tables there but still waiting a while till it gets popular.
|
|
|
|
|
Que gran trabajo! Es fenomenal que enseñen esto a los mas jovenes, la generacion que usara Blockchain en todo su potenccial!
Piensan hacer mas seminarios? Piensan grabar los seminarios?
|
|
|
|
|
Interesante noticia, el mayor Airdrop que vivo hasta ahora (que no sea Scam).
Seguro que atrae a muchos nuevos usuarios, oportunistas, primerizos...
El resultado en numeros de nuevo usuarios creo que sera muy afectado por multi-accounting.
Gracias por facilitar los links para acceder al airdrop.
|
|
|
|
I have few things to comment
1 -) about bitcoin: I think it's impossible for the bitcoin price to reach $50,000 this year, and I find it very difficult for the price of bitcoin to reach $50,000 next year. In my opinion we will see the $50,000 after 2020
2 -) about ETH: I think it is impossible for the ETH price to reach $1000 this year, maybe next year, once the bitcoin price increases to $18000, then the ETH price will be $1000.
Comments sound more realistic than then press releases! IMO both comment are exaggerated because the current market is showing more sign of stability and survival rather than the supposed big price turn over, as you've already stated it could one of the be some big players manipulative strategy, but that'd wouldn't matter if indeed it makes a positive significant impact on the market.
I think that would matter somehow, difficult to say if we are not in the game. The first article has almost nothing to do about the future bitcoin price.It's a discussion about crypto "risk-coverage" or a "risk-weighted price" and some other bullshit.If one investor owns one bitcoin,the investor will have to cover 8 times (800%) the price of that bitcoin,in order to secure it's market position.
Total nonsense,if you ask me....
I don't really care that much about ethereum though.I didn't read the second article.
yeah, it is confusing. Cool reaction to J.P.Morgan and Eth news |
|
|
|
|
Well, this an everyday job, get people to understand WHY Bitcoin is a good alternative. They will get interested if they understand WHY.
Otherwise is difficult to get them interested enough to go to the "HOW" and "What" moment.
|
|
|
|
Will the value of native currency fall down if the usage of bitcoin increases?do people feel that they don't need fiat anymore for the transactions to happen?Is that why people are trying to let down bitcoin ? Many questions are just wandering in my mind at the moment. Can anyone answer atleast few of them?
I hope that native currencies like USD or EUR will not have the control they had last decades thanks to bitcoin. But I don't think this will happen anytime soon. most people feel they need fiat for a transaction, most of them don't know about crypto. Wich people are trying to let down BTC? We can try to answer a few of them, keep the question coming. But make some research online, or in the forum, so much covered already. |
|
|
|
|
Maybe because it's already working good enough for the directives.
Maybe because it's an expensive change, also exposure to failure.
Maybe because its a new difficult, maybe lose some users, new learning required.
Maybe because they are social mind control tool and it not good for the actual monetary system.
Maybe they wait till some competition pops-up and then make moves.
just some ideas...
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin prices are getting to high for speculators to really see the huge gains they imagined before when you buy at 6k it has to gain 1 trillion dollars in market cap for you just to 10x your investment.
That does not sound very appealing to me bitcoin is high even at 6000 never mind some crazy number like 60,000 we need to see many more realworld use and adoption before we imagine these crazy prices.
At this point I think these same investors would rather buy smaller altcoins and just bet on them becoming big like bitcoin safer and more likely bet.
Maybe right, but not all a looking for a quick 10x with BTC, others may be looking at it like gold, or a not very risky bet (if you compare to the low cap coins) There are always some Gems coming up, let's see if the volatility there brings some nice numbers up. |
|
|
|
<...>Imagina a todos los que peudan, evadiendo imuestos por perdidas del 90% (la bajada de general).<...>
A mi entender, las pérdidas en criptodivisas se tratarían como pérdidas patrimoniales, donde figuran los fondos de inversión y el rendimiento de las acciones. Las criptodivisas seguramente se engrosarían aquí, y la bajada que indicas de valor servirían para compensar las ganancias de la cuenta de Ganancias y Pérdidas patrimoniales, pero no de los demás apartados (*). Si no me equivoco, este apartado no podrá ser negativo, pero si compensarse con los sucesivos cuatro ejercicios fiscales. (*) En la renta 2018 entendí que el 20% de las pérdidas de la cuenta de Ganancias y Pérdidas patrimoniales pueden usarse para compensar la cuenta de Rendimientos del Capital Mobiliario (depósitos en cuentas bancarias, intereses de las mismas, etc), y vice-versa.Por ejemplo, si con los fondos de inversión has generado unos intereses de 500€, pero has perdido 1200€ en bolsa, el saldo de las ganancias y pérdidas patrimoniales sería de -700€. Si de sus depósitos (rendimiento del capital mobiliario) ha ganado 200€, podrá compensar el 20% con las pérdidas patrimoniales -> 200€*20% = 40€. Luego las pérdidas patrimoniales son de -700€+40€ = -660€. Como es un importe negativo, la casilla correspondiente de la renta tendrá el valor 0€ en concepto de ganancias y pérdidas patrimoniales, importe que podrá usar para compensar con ganancias a lo largo de los 4 próximos años. Si cada año sólo tenemos pérdidas de las criptodividas, en el fondo no ahorramos nada de impuestos, salvo que se puedan cancelar con otras partidas como he indicado arriba (y son unas en concreto). No compensan directamente los rendimientos del trabajo por ejemplo. En todo caso, si haría/hará falta un buen manual explicativo y exhaustivo, para que sepamos en todo caso cómo actuar y qué se considera pérdida real efectiva (hasta no formalizar la venta entiendo que no hay pérdida ni ganancia efectiva). Es un tema muy interesante,por desgracia para mi, yo no me conozco en estos temas. Gracias por tu aporte y aclaracion. Podrias copartir algunas fuentes relacionas a esto? De pais a pais sumpongo que podran variar todos estos datos. |
|
|
|
Still people talking about this? I was thinking no one cares anymore. I don't believe it is going to be approved in the next months, or years. I would rather bet on XRP or BCH to get this approval |
|
|
|
The primary risk of ever more stablecoins is splintering their markets into a bunch of tiny and weak ones. I see no reason why any self respecting exchange would list multiple coins. All they're doing it creating an incomprehensible mess with piddling volumes.
So we are a bit more confused, newcomers will be even more confused. Absolutely no way would places like Gemini or Circle gaily issue unbacked coins. It's not going to happen. They have heavyweight investors and regulators up their arse. They'll be a level of legitimacy higher than anything that's come before.
You never know, a lot of things can happen, and who knows which things are ever coming to the average person.(private info, and secret handles) Another risk is running them on ETH. If you have another cryptokitties then your quasi dollar gets stuck in a swamp of txs. And I hope those contracts are watertight as well.
right, this is a weak point. Maybe we soon see SC (Stablecoin) based on other Blockchains, more and more SCs? Too many And be prepared to have some more. A friend told me that some exchange in Romania has launched its own stable coin or stablelion. (god how this sounds in English ). Funny people there Stable-lion |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
