No problem, now I can see a series of threads related to problems that users are facing with coinbase. I think the company should hire someone to check such complaints and try to solve such problems, because the amount of complaints is really alarming. And it seems like this has been happening since more than a year ago...

The mining difficulty made a huge leap on the last day, so I would avoid any cloud mining service. Hashnest has an interesting mining system, since the user can buy hashpower and sell at any time in the market, not at the same price, of course.

I was considering this investment possibility, but then I realized that the maintenance fee is relatively high, and this will cause an even greater impact on the gains after the recent increase in the difficulty of mining.

I think even if Bitcoin was in the $ 2000 range, it probably would not be the right time to cash out that much money and buy a house with it. But everything will depend on the needs of the individual. If the person in fact needs a new place to live, and if that is a priority, then it may be the right thing to do.

I realized that there has been a huge increase in the mining difficulty lately. 16.64% is a large number, especially after such a long time without big jumps... The company launched the data center announced last year? What happened to the S7 miners? Is s9 the only option giving some profit?

Yeah, this is not something you learn overnight. There is a high difficulty in adapting to this market, especially in the early stages. Even the most experienced and successful traders in the market had moments of loss at the beginning. The good thing is that the time it will take to adapt and have good results only depends on the investor.

These are probably the best possibilities, but there is no way to guarantee that there will be roi for the long term, as some of these coins, especially ethereum and zcash, are coins that are subject to much instability. Ethereum has yet to solve problems related to scalability and attack vectors. Zcash is a cryptocurrency that will surely bring in many inquiries due to the 20% fee that miners have to pay to developers.

If they actually launched the data center, then this is possibly one of the big causes for the significant increase in mining difficulty, as it was a very large project. I also saw on their website that they have launched a new mining equipment, that is currently available for sale. According to them, there is a considerable gain in terms of energy efficiency.

It depends on the country, because Bitcoin becomes more and more connected to the economy of some countries. There are places where inflation is very high, and governments put many impositions on the currencies of these countries. I think in these places Bitcoin has a great chance of expanding.

People who have long been in the market know a lot of manipulation techniques and, as long as there is the possibility of profiting from it, they will continue to use such tactics. That's the reason why it is not recommended to trade at or near the bottom price.

If you want to continue in this market, listen to the advice of experienced people, and collect every information you need to make the best decisions.

Some of the names quoted in the EconoTimes article are easy to recognize. It's good to see them on the scene, because there are investors who would certainly not invest if the project did not have great relevance, and this has the potential to attract more investors.

The amount raised will also make a big difference. Developers will need it to compete with existing projects.

I see users commenting on this, but I have not found the sources. It would be better if you could post the links of the threads on which users are complaining about it. It would also be interesting if users could post some evidence about the issues they are facing. This could be useful to the community.

This year Bitcoin is likely to attract many investors, but this is not going to be a consequence of Trump's victory. This will be a consequence of new projects that may be developed on top of Bitcoin. In fact, many of these projects are already under development, but it's difficult to know the exact date on which they will be delivered.

It depends on the type of money because, if the individual depends entirely on fiat currency, in fact it is difficult to say that he/she is free, since the government has control over the way that this currency is issued, so the government also has control on the value of that currency. However, if the person choose Bitcoin, this person chose one of the few ways to have freedom.

First I thought it was photoshopped, I had to personally see this on Twitter to know it's real. The fact is that Ethereum had chances of being in a much better position if developers decided not to fork it... and back to Bitcoin, it's hard to believe that this guy is playing in the community's favor with such statements.

For a payment system that is relatively new, things are evolving efficiently. As one expert once said, Bitcoin is in a phase similar to the phase in which email services were a few decades ago, but over time things have been moving forward and we have what exists today. Probably sending Bitcoin will be as easy as sending an email some day.

I'm not sure how these websites can run for so long without charging such fees, because in general do not charge this and keep the service with good quality is something unfeasible. Such fees are what developers earn to maintain the stability and quality of the services.

From what I see, one of the things could not exist without the other... but if I had to decide the most important factor, I would certainly also choose mass adoption, because the price depends on whether or not there is demand. Even if Bitcoin was undervalued for some time, if there was demand, at some point the market would have to find a balance, and the price would be adjusted.

I think it would take a lot of research for that. There are factors that make it difficult, such as the fact that many users are anonymous. This can cause a significant margin of error. But if the research is done so that users could also participate anonymously, this problem could be mitigated.

It was lucky that was not a larger amount than that. Trading is a very risky business, especially altcoins trading, since most of the cryptos have a relatively small market which can be easily manipulated by just a few people. That is why in general it is not recommended this type of market for beginners.

I hope they are not in as bad a situation as some people say, because in this case there are few options for reliable exchanges. Even bitfinex has been hacked in the past year. A few months later coinbase went through legal problems. If we continue in this way users will be more insecure about using exchanges.