hi all, i need a tool (both windows and linux) that will parse a blockchain and generate a CSV table that lists the total unspent balance for each address.

willing to pay if we can agree.

The Cent fiasco has produced rare unique situations that have allowed exploration into the world of PoS in the same way Shakezula's sCrypt coin allowed us to test the limits of PoW sCrypt. The PoS difficulty has risen fairly well, that i think it may be time to discuss a PoS GPU miner, either seperate or as part of something like the modified cgminer/ybcminer.

Your thoughts?

Point of correction before i unwatch this thread. I was there the very minute shake announced it on the old cryptsy chat box. He stated clearly it was for fun but did not block commercialization. Either way all that's left is staking and selling. This coin is dead unless something is done soon, the smart ones will have sold all by the 5th because i doubt anyone one who knows will still be buying.

I take it you are an expert? Take note that your last ten posts have been on this thread, so why don't you take your own advice and shove it up where it belongs.

I stake Daily, and i today's total is close to 89 Billion. i actually get lazy to send coins to cryptsy, and i think i have a wallet that has staked 4 times without me looking at it...unless the pc shutdown for some reason. I am not saying lets delete coins, i am saying lets change 10000000000000 to 1000 or 10000, this allows us to be able to transfer all our coins in one go, and they will stake in one go. I am saying that the image of this coin is bad due to the absurd amount of coin out there and the way it grows.. so to fix it, let's reduce what the eyes see. If i say i have a trillion cent, it takes time to register how many zeros are involved and then compare that to the 1 coin reward for mining. By dividing the coin supply, we not only save it's image but encourage people to mine again, which in turn will make transactions instant.

the scam guy?

your grasp of the English language is terrible. it would make a damn difference if the total supply is divided because it would return the numbers to sane levels. also you keep overlooking the overall effect of PoS.....60 trillion it would still stake 60 Billion or more weekly with your reduction in stake.

Grasp this......THERE ARE TOO MANY PENNIES IN EXISTENCE, WE WOULD LIKE TO START REMEDYING THAT. I know you are not the original dev, but as a stand in, please do not take such an attitude to people's investment. I am nearly done cashing out, and i'll continue dumping unless a viable fix to the money supply is put in place.. saying you've reduced the stake by so much percentage is meaningless unless you plug in values and calculate based on that.

My point is, there are too many in existence. The whole idea of indivisibility was novel, but it only exacerbates the problem, divisibility should be retuned at the same time that stake is removed to ensure this coin lives and people's investment of time , funds and costs does not go down the drain.
Trying to stick to the idea of having trillions that are continuing to stake is absurd, even with the stake reduction if i have a trillion, i will stake 10 Billion, as a result the mony supply will still grow very fast.

but if we divide by ten billion then a trillion becomes a hundred coins, which grow by 1 coin a week, which is far more manageable growth. in a month even with the stake fix, we may very well reach the point where the client is unable to display the balance.

So it would deal with inflation, absurd numbers, and stay well within transaction limits for A LONG TIME.

Just food for thought.

dead already? and here i was ready to get into it.

i know you are busy, but did you ever think about re-introducing decimals and placing at a point where it divides by 10 billion? It means you won't have to bother with increasing the transaction limit. and since there is time you can just put it in the current update.

never had a stake in 7 days, and i bn here since start.

just a reminder, today and tomorrow are the last days you can buy anything that will actually fall in the mega stake period.

a quick study of economics will assist you. Also, keep in mind that BTC, LTC and other major coins all have a "halving" every so many blocks. Rather than hit miners with shock reductions, gradual reduction is a finer option.

Official Proposal


Barwizi

Version 0.1
=============

Proposal January 2014 (Strategic)

• Use of a modified Momentum algo to switch from GPU mineable sCrypt to CPU
• Introduction of PoS of 0.01% per week
• Exponential decay of mining rewards at 10% every 2100000 Blocks
• Change of the reward to 100 coins per block
• Limiting the Cap at 21 million
• Allowing use of the Voting System to help core team keep afloat financially
• Maintain Experimental state of coin but introduce securities (Share Certificates) directly tradeable for fiat currency
• Introduce a share system that equates a holders's wallet balance to a % stake in the ALL VENTURES undertaken by Weiss International Crypto Finanace Division
• Importation of the current coin of choice for WICFD i.e Noirbits balances to enable stake holders to transfer all holdings to the new chain if they wish to partake in the company business
• Possible introduction of Post mining proof of stake that will reward those who opt to stay on the Original NRB chain, essentially for every coin year (~262800 blocks) Users with active NRB Bank accounts will  be awarded 60% stake on the coins in their account in the last 10k blocks before coin year passes

to get them out of cryptsy , use chunks of 900m. then once they are in your wallet, create another and send smaller chunks to it.

you are of course right, For NRB 2.0 only NRB can be imported and they will mean a lot. I just need to reduce the sharecount and ensure that no individual especially exchanges, holds too much of a controlling share and can override either my or the group's decisions. As for the merged sCrypt coin, i'll leave it to the NRB community to choose which coins we accept as this is part of the company's projects, as it stands any proceeds made from this will be divided and recorded, the actual payouts will be made once i get someone to design the website and engine I need. The payouts are based on how much NRB 2.0 you hold.

Ok, the actual algo hasn't been decide but AES looks good thus far. As for conversion, no it will probably be a lower ratio. I intend to lower the total supply in a way that makes the share issuing simpler for me. Issuing 50 million share via post would be tough on me. I think bringing it down to 12 million would be great, that way i can mail paper wallets that represent shares to people, and should i manage to get this 3D printer working...i'll begin printing plastic coins with the Bar-code wallets inside.

ensure that  you do not pass the 900 mill per tx.

then once they are in your wallet make sure to send to another wallet with smaller transactions.

Ok, all updates will be posted here.


you would import the private key of your NRB wallet

This will be a once off thing, merging the chains by importing is not limited to sCrypt coins. We could literary grab any coin and give it a place in this chain.
I intend to merge only coins that are traded bu have been abandoned by their devs.

The allocation is not an issue, by deciding say we will merge 10 coins.... we simply look at it's value and give it an equivalent portion.  Example:-

we dedicate redeemable 10% of the new chain to coin imports, look at the explanation below.

Say we look at coin X traded at 0.001 BTC each and there are 1000 of them
                            y               0.01  BTC each                     1000 of them
                            z               0.00001 BTC each                 100k of them

coin each unit of y is equivalent to 10 of x and 1k of z, so we allocate the 10% based 1:10:1000 if we were importing those three only.

The math becomes more complicated the more coins involved but it is feasible. unlike the MMC/PTS import that dictated a prie based on dev's opinion, this will be based on actual market price on a given day and publicized so people can pick which coin(s) they wish to hold.

The trade is based on market price not NRB, the option i will give NRB holders is the ability to import into NRB 2.0 which will stick to the spirit i launched NRB in ...i.e no premine, experimental and capable of expansion.

NRB 2.0

While some things are cleared up, it is basically a migration from Scrypt to a new algorith that will be ASIC resistant for the forseeable future, and what makes it seperate from those who opt to join in the sCrypt coin of coins , is that holders automatically own shares in The bank and hosting project i've been talking about. The Original NRB chain is unsuitable for many reasons including the fact that some coins had "disappearing effect" also some individuals hold unhealthy amounts that would constitute a problem for share issuing (You will be mailed actual share certificates on my Birthday....i'm planning to open the hosting side and small shop and trade on that day)

 

wait until it's more than 10 days to worry