This guy gets the idea!!!

Yes you are 100% correct!

It was suggested on slack that anyone had any legitimate issues they should post on here and explain the reasoning. So here goes.



I've watched this project for a few months now so am familiar with it. I think like others appreciate CCREVS work in early stage of XBY but I think that is not enough to jeopardize people's investments. My concern is this that people familiar with the project understandably like CCREV as a person but how things are now outsiders will assume he is the leader of Xby. My problem is CCREV is clearly to any casual outsider looking into XBY a person that will not inspire professional people to understand that Borz is making a potential ETH rival. To head big projects people usually have some credentials of either being an absolute genius in crypto like a Vitalik or someone who has a proven track record in tech industry. I humbly suggest CCREV has neither as 99% of us and I include myself also don't. A professional high level project like this MUST have someone at the helm of power with that kind of credentials I believe.


At this stage as we are still very unknown we can weather these storms of CCREVS creating but as we grow even one of these events could literally destroy the reputation of XBY. We see this everyday in crypto if a website crashes or a developer is rejected by the wider crypto community. Tech is almost everything but not everything, how a project presents and its reputation is also essential.

I really don't know how to say anymore without looking like someone who is attacking someone. Bottom line I just feel like this project and all the work being done by the developer and the team and the communities hopes and real money (which should not be belittled as it is the fruit of their time and effort often) is being disregarded and held to ransom for the personal whims of one person who sorry I have to say this but is completely non essential to the future success. I don't have answers really, just concerns. I don't see this as a personal attack as I believe all men are made equal but we must all act for the good of others not just ourselves.

I agree moat ICOs are going to fail on the long run but it could be exactly the same for blockchains...
It doesn't matter if it's just a coin or a new infrastructure. What matters is the quality of the product and if people are willing to use it.

Being of ICO quality is confusing me, are you saying that because someone holds an ICO their coin/project is worth more and is more credible than someone that writes the code and creates the project from scratch themselves?

An ICO nowadays especially via ETH is too easy for someone to setup and there is too much greed, everybody that has a coin or project to launch now wants to do it by raising an insane amount of money without having to do anything,  I think it has become a FAD now and people are chasing a quick profit so are throwing money at any ICO.

There are some that are great and I have been part of some decent ones but only after really looking into the project and not just because it is an ICO.

That's my little rant over, not directed at you just in general.

Please don't ignore those projects that have been in existence steadily growing with dedicated devs working hard behind the scenes.

Tezos. I just don't know if the ICO is still going on. Same as IOTA. But it's already on the market. Bancor also. It's popular but i don't know about this ICO. Xtrabytes seems a good ICO too. I prefer them than Coval. But it's up to you what ICO you want to invest. Market is sleeping. So ICOs is worth to invest  than the market for now. Goodluck anyway.

uh, it basically was an ico. you bought a dead coin in return for a live one. the thing is they didn't really tell anyone that until after the fact. it's the ico phase now.

if gotten listed to another big exchange such trex or polo for sure the value will rise up but right now its all speculations and the project needs more
advertisement and more social information so investors will get some attention and read the plan.

So, why only 51%, why this weird number exactly?

you do realize that all the things you said here, mostly about scaling and a lot more has been said a million times by a thousand different altcoins. each of them also lied about lots of things such as being used by big companies that makes you laugh when you hear it!

these are just empty claims until proven otherwise.

ethereum was claiming, and still is, to have no scaling issue. the flippening bullshit is still out there but we all saw as soon as it gained some traction the whole system crumbled.

show us real usage.
show us merchant adoption.
show us how your network will handle 10,000 transaction each 10 seconds
show us how your network will perform under 3 years of spam attack.
...