 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 »
|
|
i think promotions on the chans and chan community is key here. maybe tipping during the 4chan cup? also tons of shitposting and advertisement on 8chan is cheap
|
|
|
|
|
discord not working i cant join the invite has expired. I bought over 100,000 chans how can i make sure they dont get burned? I am not andy but i spent a bit o cash on them. I belieb in the memes and if we get this coins working it can be breddy gud 4 us
|
|
|
|
|
can someone fill me in on the specifics of the coins being burned and how many? what address it is so i can monitor it on the block explorer and check for myself before seriously investing in this coin
|
|
|
|
Geo is rising. Should I buy more?
In my opnion yes anything under 20$ is a steal in long term |
|
|
|
ayyy bitbob still here  great hows this coin doing? any news on future endeavors? |
|
|
|
|
anyone have a link to the GITHUB i want to look at the source for the ICO
|
|
|
|
|
glad to see this one back up hope it keeps going
|
|
|
|
|
do not be sad from a small drop in price. a good coin can go very high. I see this project reaching 50$+in the future. HOLD EM BAGS BOYS
|
|
|
|
|
still haven't reached the moon yet boys
|
|
|
|
|
isnt this coin supposed to be super secure?
|
|
|
|
|
10$ is reasonable but if geocoin reaches the mainstream geocaching community it will easily reach 20-50$
|
|
|
|
i think humans would find any way possible to manipulate this system for monetary reward. If someone could hack a computer a bit to emulate two humans to earn twice as much, then that system has a direct monetary reward.. and development shall begin.
Maybe it has to be proof of human with no computer hardware..
the sequence would have to be something that can only happen once. Like a key to the next step would be in a database that purges itself once accessed once. if someone tried to hack the database they would receive a salted hash. Making them feels stupid because its a lot easier to prove they are human than to solve a salted hash. |
|
|
|
Could you explain how steganographic/cryptographic could be made to be immune from algorithms? One immune puzzle will not work, as it would be easy to program the solution to that single puzzle into a bot's logic. There is also a way to make a Human prove they are a human before they even have access to the puzzle  via ReCaptcha? It is not immune to computer algorithms either... Google shows numerous instances of research showing it being breakable. via captchas? Plenty of literature showing they are even less immune than reCaptcha... I agree that one puzzle would not work the puzzles would have to be different every time with completely different solutions and using different algorithms to encrypt the answers.I would steer away from anything captcha related. Think BIGGER and more dynamic. The puzzles would have to be dynamic and created by a human with the answers encrypted by a computer and deployed at random by a computer. |
|
|
|
|
wow you are doing really great im going to start being very bullish on this coin even more so than I have been. Anyone with week hands will regret it in about a year.
|
|
|
|
...
HUMAN solving some sort of puzzle unsolvable by a computer
...
solves a series of puzzles proving that the USER is IN FACT a HUMAN ...
These are the weak links of your idea. There are no puzzles that humans can solve that an algorithm can't. --------------- There are puzzles that a computer cant solve. Steganographic and cryptographic puzzles are a good place to start. Also there is a chess puzzle that a computer can not solve http://mashable.com/2017/03/14/solve-this-chess-puzzle/#xsRzI9xYgiq3 There is also a way to make a Human prove they are a human before they even have access to the puzzle |
|
|
|
|
What about a coin that before it enters circulation. The key to the coin or coins location after being mined is held on a uncrackable and encrypted database that terminates itself after a HUMAN solves a sequence of steps and puzzles to prove the USER is a human? The inputs to access this database would be sanitized properly and the "Keys" stored in this database would be stored as a Salted Hash until a human properly retrieved it. If malicious code was injected into the database and ANYTHING was retrieved. Not only would the attacker receive a Salted Hash but the database would know something was pulled from it and Purge itself, since it only stores the single Salted hash anyways. The attacker would be left with a Salted Hash to try and crack to gain access to the key witch would make them feel stupid because its a HELL of a lot easier to just prove you are human. Of course to implement this you would need hundreds of thousands of databases and thousands more being created daily by a decentralized service. So this is all in theory at this point.
|
|
|
|
OK guys i am deeply interested in this right now. '
If a coin or coins were only able to enter the circulating supply by a HUMAN solving some sort of puzzle unsolvable by a computer alone does this constitute as a PROOF OF HUMAN coin? or is this a PUZZLECOIN?
here is another point of view.
Say there are coins being MINED using something similar to Proof of Stake (proof of stake would not work properly in my opinion but this is just an example) and transaction ledger is being built. The transactions happen just the same as any coin with a user, and a wallet, and a private key.
HOWEVER!!!
The new coins that are being created are locked! The private key to each one of these coins is not available. Once a human comes into the picture and solves a series of puzzles proving that the USER is IN FACT a HUMAN the final puzzle would reveal a key that would decrypt address/location that the new coins were created are in. This is how coins would enter into circulation. From then on they would function as a normal crypto.
Which one of these examples constitutes a TRUE proof of human coin? Are they both proof of human?
If they are? How would you implement these puzzles?
please serious discussion I am really into this. There are tons of resources about this out there from cryptographer even before true crypto.
can someone here please give me a response to my questions? on page 2? Do any of these scenarios constitute a proof of human coin? |
|
|
|
|
OK guys i am deeply interested in this right now. '
If a coin or coins were only able to enter the circulating supply by a HUMAN solving some sort of puzzle unsolvable by a computer alone does this constitute as a PROOF OF HUMAN coin? or is this a PUZZLECOIN?
here is another point of view.
Say there are coins being MINED using something similar to Proof of Stake (proof of stake would not work properly in my opinion but this is just an example) and transaction ledger is being built. The transactions happen just the same as any coin with a user, and a wallet, and a private key.
HOWEVER!!!
The new coins that are being created are locked! The private key to each one of these coins is not available. Once a human comes into the picture and solves a series of puzzles proving that the USER is IN FACT a HUMAN the final puzzle would reveal a key that would decrypt address/location that the new coins were created are in. This is how coins would enter into circulation. From then on they would function as a normal crypto.
Which one of these examples constitutes a TRUE proof of human coin? Are they both proof of human?
If they are? How would you implement these puzzles?
please serious discussion I am really into this. There are tons of resources about this out there from cryptographer even before true crypto.
|
|
|
|
|
I feel like POS is better for the environment than POW ;/
|
|
|
|
|
