@AmoreJaz, Some changes are needed on the "Gambling sites using Third Party Services" section. Dinabot doesn't provide the exchange service to Primedice users. They have disabled it a few months ago. Dinabot is still working for Stake users and the exchange fee is 3%-5% normally. On the other, a new exchanger (Poorbot.io) has started their journey for Stake.com users. They are providing the service with a 0.3% exchange fee rate.

Sharing the bonus code in the ANN thread isn't against the rules of the forum. A different casino is continuously doing this in their ANN thread. BTW, Coins.game team have sent another email today with the bonus code for all users. It has been posted in their telegram channel too. There is no wagering requirement to claim the bonus code.

I wasn't expecting pre-monthly bonus in this month. Because we had received a few many bonuses in the December month for the Christmas celebration. I just checked my mailbox after watching your post and claimed the bonus too. The pre-monthly bonus isn't related to New Year celebration. They are celebrating the Stake F1 title partnership with this bonus. Anyway, I got some luck from the bonus after a long time. I have received $12 from it and turned it above $120 and made a withdrawal successfully .

Looks like all the sig participants of Wild.io trying to defend the casino reputation here. It is slightly reasonable. But some of you are clueless about the whole situation and defending the casino, which doesn't make any sense. The user has already submitted a complaint at Casino Guru one week ago and provided some evidences there also. Wild.io team hasn't replied to that complaint yet (check it). Moreover, the representative of the casino is inactive here for since last 11 days.

I think it isn't necessary to create a scam accusation thread in Bitcointalk forum now as the complaint of the users is already active on a mediator servic (CasinoGuru). Has any of you reached the casino team by telling them to look into the issue of that user?

You won't even receive any appropriate answer if you ask about it to the support agent. I had asked the support agent about this and they said that this feature is available for the advance users only. They think normal user won't be able to verify the fairness as it is complicated. I also asked them to provide the algorithms, but they didn't give any response to it.



To be frank, it is strange behaviour of the Rollbit team. The verification process should be available publicly for all users so that those users can verify it who understands the system.

But it is simply against the rules of Bitcointalk forum. Based on the second pinned post rules of gambling board, you should run such offers in games and rounds section. I can see that you have already created a thread in the games and rounds section. Now there shouldn't be any problem. But rewarding XP for the feedbacks is something new and unique. I haven't seen anything like that before.

Miraz wasn't in the playing XI today. He was at the bench in this T20 series. Mahedi Hasan is a different person, although his name is pretty similar to Miraz. Anyway, Mustafizur Rahman also bowled well beside Mahedi Hasan and Shoriful Islam in this series. The pitch was pretty much in favour of the bowlers in the T20 series. That's why New Zealand struggled today to chase the small target.

Yep, the users are free to share their opinion about your casino here. But the format of the each review/post is similar. They are including a screenshot of the withdrawal and their username in the post by saying something positive about Sicodice. Looks like they are asked to post a positive review here in order to receive a small bonus. All these positive reviews are from newbie users with the same pattern. Overall, it isn’t going to create a positive impression here.

Based on your deposit address, you have indeed played with deposits even after submitting the complaint on Casino Guru and creating this thread here. Which is strange. Why have you done it while Chips.gg had blocked your withdrawal when you won big before 19th November?

Maybe his allegation isn't accurate. But what about the conversations of 'tacyarg' with other staff? tacyarg has suggested the staff to block the user account who will win big. And tacyarg was also celebrating when a user (OP) has lost his account balance by facing the withdrawal block issue. How ethical is it?



And you are continuously ignoring the questions about the Curacao gambling license of Chips.gg. I have asked it before and holydarkness has highlighted it also. Why are you ignoring this question?

There was no bonus drop from Stake team after the 25th December of previous year Christmas celebration. The situation will be same this time. However, they have created a new telegram channel for the high rollers, where they will post higher bonus with pretty big weekly wager requirement. On the 27th December, they have made a bonus drop of $50 with $200k wagering requirement within last 7 days.

Yep, Eddie had said that in one of his weekly stream a long time ago.

Looks like the problem appears when we are trying to access Rainbet by using the subdomain 'www'. Cloudflare isn't blocking me when I'm trying to access your site without using the 'www.' before the domain name. The hyperlink in your main post contains the subdomain in it. Perhaps, everyone is getting the block message from Cloudflare whoever trying to access through that link. I can see a discussion about similar thing on Cloudflare community, where the source of the problem was HubSpot connection.

BTW, it doesn't look good as you have posted two big images in the reserve post in this thread. Reserve posts should be used for change log and to give updates about the bonuses.

I was checking the scoreboards occasionally, Pakistan needed 106 runs when I checked it for the last time. They had 5 wickets in hand. I thought that it is going to be an easy win for them and the match will head towards the day 5. But I was surprised when I checked the scoreboard after an hour. However, Pakistan did a lot better in the second test after having a thrashing defeat in the first test.

New Zealand was at 54-1 at the end of the powerplay. I was thinking that NZ will score around 180 runs as the way they were batting. But they situation completely turned in favour of Bangladesh in the next 5 overs, especially after the fall of Tim Seifert wicket. The target would have been low even if the match was played by reducing the overs. Bangladesh bowlers are doing quite well in the T20 format there. I won't be surprised if they manage to win the series by winning the last match.

Those are indeed 3rd party service, but they are working with the API access from Stake team. Moreover, both of them don't accept big amounts for the exchanges. I think they are not here to scam, their main goal is to generate some profit from the exchange fee. However, it is true that Stake won't be responsible if anyone get scammed by these 3rd party service. Do you think that they are going to scam the user of Stake? Dinabot has been working since 2018 or 2019, there were some reports about the delays from the users. We haven't seen any scam report against them.

The screenshot (provided by Chips.gg representative) isn't showing any deposit of your which is worth $9k. Even, the total sum of the deposits isn't equivalent to $9k (which is visible in the screenshot). We are already aware of the fact that you have lost the remaining account balance by placing more bets. But it looks like you have made some deposits and withdrawals even after facing the withdrawal block and delays. Is it true?

I have used Dinabot a lot of times in the past. The exchange fee rate is pretty high at Dinabot (3%-5%), otherwise it was pretty good and smooth. But your one is better as you are providing the service with 0.3% exchange fee only. You are providing a 3rd party service, but this type of service doesn't work automatically without API access from the site. Have you taken the API access from Eddie? Or will your exchange service work manually?

@Pmalek, It's been a while since you have rechecked and updated the withdrawal information of all casinos. But I think it is necessary now to perform a major update by rechecking the information from each casino. The transaction fee has increased significantly as there is a high load on Bitcoin network. Some casinos have increased their minimum withdrawal limit to reduce the pressure of Bitcoin withdrawal. As example, BitKong has increased the min withdrawal limit to 0.001 BTC, they have increased the withdrawal fee too. Gamdom and LuckyDiamond has changed it to $220 and 0.005 BTC respectively.

Maybe you would like to remove the word 'around' from the withdrawal amount column of Duelbits, it isn't necessary there . There is a typo in the FortuneJack withdrawal limit command for the fiat to BTC exchange rate, you have used $20 command instead of $4.

On the other hand, it looks like Stake has made changes in their Bitcoin withdrawal system. Maybe the min withdrawal limit is equivalent to $2.5 for Bitcoin now (like the altcoins). And the withdrawal fee is dynamic or it could be equivalent to $4 for BTC. I'm not exactly sure about this though, and the support agents are clueless about the changes.

Are you welcoming US players on 500Casino? Looks like 'tableplay' was referring to the fact that a user from the US has played at 500Casino by completing the level 1 KYC verification. Although the support agent hadn't meant the KYC verification by level 1, 'tableplay' has a wrong impression about it. Still, US players aren't allowed in 500Casino based on the terms.

You may face difficulties if you are from any of these countries:

I have also received $22 from the second monthly bonus, where I had received $7 only from the first one as my gambling activity was low before. I tried the all-in strategy of ryzaadit to make profits quickly . I was unlucky and lost my first all-in bet on the 2× payout. You are lucky there to manage some profit from the bonus.

It happens in all types of contest at every casino. Some people appear at the top of the leaderboard by participating lately. I myself experienced it on the wagering and ROI contest of different casinos. Anyway, congrats for your 2nd rank. The reward is still lovely for the 2nd rank.