Maybe increasing the faucet reset timer to 2 hours from 1 hour will be the perfect solution in that case. But TheQuin had described about a different solution. They may add 2 extra decimal to the Bitcoin amount on their website to give $0.002 base reward on each hourly faucet claim. However, Freebitco team have to change their slogan 'win up to $200 every hour' to a different one if they follow the alternative method which you guys have said above.

Don't expect the pre-monthly and post-monthly on every month of the year. It is an additional bonus which may come as surprise occasionally, Eddie has increased our expectations for those bonuses by giving it consecutively in the last few months. Perhaps, we will receive the monthly bonus on the next week (Friday, 15th March).

What is the benefit of having them as your referral if they withdraw the funds instantly after receiving the tip? The new users are required to fill the level 1 KYC information to enable the withdrawal on Stake. Although I could be wrong here, but Stake team may apply higher level KYC requirements on your referral if most of them just withdraw the funds after receiving the tip.

I think the second suggestion will be effective to reduce the number of spammers from Stake campaign. They have to increase the pay rate for each post, which will attract the qualitative posters to apply in the campaign. Most of the participants of Stake sig campaign are just making long posts without including any valuable context in it.

I was confused with this post of a Stake sig campaign participant. The user had quoted the replies from a different topic and made his post on my thread. It could be a mistake by the user, but I was surprised that the moderators haven't taken any action on that post yet. I had reported it by describing the reason properly in comments section.

I have wagered around $2k only on Shuffle until now, and I haven't received any SHFL tokens from the airdrop. I couldn't find out the requirement to be eligible for the SHFL airdrop.

FUN tokens came with some beneficial features for the users (E.g. Freebitco premium membership), still they failed to recover it's previous price. Shuffle team has already described about the utility of SHFL token, you may check them here: Token Utility

There will be some exclusive benefits for the VIP users. And they will burn the tokens occasionally by using a part of their revenue. Anyway, SHFL tokens price won't fluctuate highly like the FUN token.

Ireland has made a great comeback despite a poor start. Their bowlers had given a lot of runs in the last 10 overs actually, and they are going to loss the match now for not bowling well in the death overs. The partnership between Tector and Tucker helped them to keep the hope alive. They aren't going to win the match though. There will be hope for Ireland as long as Harry Tector in the crease.

Level up rewards are actually a fixed percentage of the required wagered amount of each rank. It is 0.33% of the wager amount for the first rank up, then 0.25% for the next rank up. Which is same for each crypto, but the required wager amount varies for different crypto.

Maybe there is a bug in the deposit bonus system of Spinarium. There are two different deposit bonus available in Spinarium, none of them are 175%. Moreover, they aren't offering 400% on the first deposit. The bonus is divided into 4 parts, and the sum of those 4 deposit bonus is 400%.

I'm not a fan of Mbappe, but I'm happy that he has contributed to the victory of PSG yesterday by scoring two goals. The odds was a bit high for PSG in this match as they were leading by 2 - 0 by winning the first leg. I thought a few many times before staking my 10 points on PSG, and now I'm happy with my final decision.

What about Real Madrid? Manchester City is really favourite for their performance, but I think Real Madrid has the capability to stop them.

Third umpire decision was indeed questionable. I was also surprised with the quick decision of the 3rd umpire. They should have checked the ultra edge graph a few more times by changing the video timing. Non-striker batsman, Litton Das also told Soumya that where the bowl has touched. But the 3rd umpire decision was surprising. There could be a little pressure on Bangladesh batters if it was given out, but it wouldn't affect the result of the game. Bangladesh has won the match very comfortably.

Usually, there is no wagering requirement on the tip amount. But Stake may block the withdrawal of the tip receiver if you just make a deposit and tip someone else without placing any bets, and then the user tries to withdraw it without placing any bets. They shouldn't face any problem to withdraw the tip instantly if you send it after playing with your deposited funds. Stake has 1× wagering requirement on the deposits.

Their marketing wasn't unsuccessful, a lot of forum members were actively playing on Winz.io in the early days. I was playing there too. But they started to force the users to complete the KYC verification who was taking the bonuses occasionally. Moreover, they disabled the further bonuses for those users who were forced to complete the KYC verification. I was a victim of this unethical practice of Winz.io, and a few more users had complained about it in the forum. They stopped their sig campaign during those days.

Maybe they haven't gotten the success with their crypto casino as they expected. All the established and popular crypto gambling sites have sportsbook now. Nowadays, it isn’t easy for a new casino to attract the bettors with just 3rd party provider games. Some in-house games & sports betting features are also needed to attract the gamblers and generate revenue. JustCasino has lagged behind in these sections.

The UI and the colour combination of the Spinarium.com is indeed pretty good (my personal opinion though). Most probably you guys have made it better by observing other casinos. BTW, the wagering requirement and the rank up bonus to reach each VIP level is different for different crypto. Which is uncommon and strange. All other casinos have a fixed wagering requirement in USD value for the rank up. The consider the progress by taking the wager of each crypto in USD value. Why haven't you made it simple like all other casinos?

Haven't received any warning message like that. Even I haven't seen anyone to discuss about this kind of deposit warning message from any casino. Most probably Stake has added this new deposit threshold notifier recently. Which type of warnings actually written in the message?

All the bettor doesn't search for the best odds always. Some of them search for the max bet limit as well. For the high rollers, the higher odds with small max bet limit won't be attractive as average odds with huge max bet limit. The betting limit is also good at BCgame, but Stake offers a better betting limit to majority of the players.

The ending was disappointing. Shanaka did a great job in the last over, although the credit goes to the poor hitting power of Bangladeshi bowlers. Mahmudullah and Jaker Ali had changed the momentum of the game where the top orders performance was pathetic in front of a big target. The captain, Shanto played a poor knock today. Still, the team selectors and coaches should be happy as Bangladesh managed to make a great comeback despite the poor start.

You should add some evidences to give some light in your complaint. Use the Scam Report Format to make your complaint valid. Send a PM to BC.Game Support, you will get some updates from him. BTW, I just tried to view your profile by using the user id, and it looks like you have wagered on the sportsbook only. Was your KYC verification successful? What was the last response from their support?

Well, I think it is necessary to give a little summary here so that everyone can know how questionable Betnomi's refund plan was. They have marked the thread as solved in order to create an impression of paying all the victims. On 24th February, Betnomi representative claimed that they have completed the refund. But only two users have confirmed about receiving their funds until now.

Confirmation of refund:
• AHOYBRAUSE: Confirmed about receiving his funds (unknown amount)
• Betwrong: Confirmed about receiving his funds, $400+.

Pending and denied refund:
• Stayzor: 0.4 BTC and 4.5 ETH, denied without providing any proof.
• GekkeBelg: 0.9 BTC, in touch with Betnomi team privately.
• nutters: 0.125+ BTC, pending for review.
• kennymcc: New refund request.
• CryptoGods90: A streamer (promoter of Betnomi) claiming that he hasn't received the promised money.

Apart from these, no one has confirmed about receiving their funds from Betnomi. Some victims were banned from their telegram group for complaining about the stuck amount in the initial stage. Now Betnomi team has completely disabled the text messages for everyone in their telegram group.

Some forum members are widely appreciating this refund process of Betnomi without checking everything properly. But was it really a transparent refund process which can be marked as solved?

It isn't clear from your statement whether you have used multiple accounts or not, but Sportbet.one team hasn't accused you as an abuser with multiple accounts. So, your background story isn’t necessary here. However, they claimed that you have used automated software for betting, which is against the general rules of the betting platform. I couldn't find out the rules where the mentioned about the private investigation of 3 years. Where have you noticed it? Haven't they returned your deposit? You should submit a complaint on Casino Guru if you think that their decision is unfair.

It means they are going to close JustCasino.io domain, but they will continue the business with JustCasino.com where they accept fiat payments only. This is quite surprising that JustCasino team has decided to shut down their crypto related platform. Because, online crypto gambling activity has skyrocketed within last few years. It is reasonable to stop crypto related platform if they aren't getting the revenue as expected. But is their decision connected with the price fluctuation of crypto?

New Zealand has a chance now, but the chance is very low. The third wicket partnership has brought a little hope for them, which may fade away in the first session of day four. The winning odds is only 1.14× for Australia now. The chance will increase for New Zealand if Daryl Mitchell and Ravindra make a big partnership.

Casino doesn't consider an user as abuser with multiple accounts if some people use the same public ISP to place bets. They take serious steps after doing a deeper investigation, the anti-fraud system isn't that simple. Casino also observe the betting pattern, device fingerprinting, wallet address connections, etc. Most of the casino doesn’t consider the usage of VPN normally, no matter whether it is premium or shared VPN.

The anti-fraud system of a casino will keep you and your friend account to the suspicious list if both of you have same betting pattern always. It looks like the same thing has happened in those two cases which you have pointed in the main post. They were using the same ISP, which has added another piece of evidence of account connection.