Litecoin has been headed for the moon for a while now and it has not yet stopped, the little dip that you saw in the past days is because bitcoin price went to the moon and is headed for $1500 and that always causes some dips in altcoins like Litecoin and everyone is looking for opportunities to buy cheap coins so they start dumping!
at this point anything below 0.03BTC is super cheap and based on what will happen in the next couple of months about SegWit and the lightning network we may even see 0.3BTC and more. the possibilities for price is not limited when LN starts.
With over 3x the coin supply, 0.3 BTC would make it bigger than bitcoin, fyi... I think LTC is headed to 50+ USD after Segwit/LN and the impending Coinbase add, but .3 is just way, wayyyyyyyyy too ambitious for this year. |
|
|
|
|
Hope all of you amazing people had a great weekend.
Any news out of Fermat?
|
|
|
|
|
Hope they hire someone into leadership intelligent enough to realize that dumping your most legitimate coin = dumping your legitimacy
So much potential wasted on such piss poor decision making.
|
|
|
|
Membership is now closed. I do have a waiting list and currently there is 1 person on it. If anyone wants on the waiting list please let me know. Thanks everyone and forge on!  Add me to the waiting list, please |
|
|
|
but PIVx market cap is 64mil$...
And at least triple that in a month  |
|
|
|
Why would litecoin drop on activation on sigwit? With the faster transactions would people not start using litecoin more for quicker transactions?
Some profit taking and weak hands. Fudders are right about 1 thing: Segwit is priced in... but Coinbase, LN, etc are NOT priced in. |
|
|
|
i dont understand... why are ppl dumping days before dividends???
Dev team dodging questions |
|
|
|
Some of the coins will be, but if you do not want random coins going to change addresses it's best to do your entire balance to whichever addresses you want to use. While the coins are unconfirmed/intransit they will not be transferred to other addresses.
Thanks for the hand. If you "enable coin control features" under your wallet tab in options, you can check address balances under input and it gives you a lot of different options. Now I'm wondering if I screwed up whatever perfect balance I had before lol fml Who knows... Let's hope I got it better? |
|
|
|
Staking is easier to do, and could result in higher payouts depending on your luck.
Much higher in my experience. But after I kill my MNs, how do I rebalance my wallet addresses? No one has answered yet. Yes, I know I can just "send" to an address, but how do I know which address it's being sent from... or how much is in that address in the first place so I can balance my staking addresses. And on that last note, how do I check the balances of my addresses so I can do that better? Just take your total balance and divide it up between whichever addys you want to use and do it in successive transactions. That's well and good and I considered that, but how do I know it's not taking those coins from the same place I just sent it to? Which is why I asked where can I check address balances to verify? |
|
|
|
Staking is easier to do, and could result in higher payouts depending on your luck.
Much higher in my experience. But after I kill my MNs, how do I rebalance my wallet addresses? No one has answered yet. Yes, I know I can just "send" to an address, but how do I know which address it's being sent from... or how much is in that address in the first place so I can balance my staking addresses. And on that last note, how do I check the balances of my addresses so I can do that better? |
|
|
|
Also, is there a user friendly way to move coins within internal addresses on the controller wallet?
Ex: I've generated 6 total addresses now, how can I neatly organize my PIVX into 2 addresses within my wallet?
Just send the coins to the address you want them to be in, same as if you were sending to any other address. The wallet will label it as a transfer to yourself. If it's for a MN and you're adding up to 10K with a bunch of smaller inputs, you'd have to accumulate 10K+ in a single address and then transfer exactly 10K in a single transaction from there to your desired MN address. Also, re: MN payout frequency... The 3+ day thing is just at the start, after you've enabled your MN. After that, the payout will, on average, follow the expected rate given the current block reward and number of MNs on the network. Having run MNs for well more than a year now, I've never had a deviation from the expected payout schedule of more than a few hours either way, and the overall payout rate has always matched the expected rate. Given the current number of MNs, staking is very nearly as attractive as running a MN. So if you don't want the hassle of managing a MN, staking may well be the better option for you. Personally, I prefer MNs because you don't need to keep the controller wallet online, which feels more secure, and you're better positioned to take advantage of the uptick in payout amount/rate that comes if/when there's a selloff or network hiccup. Yeah, so far this MN experiment has only cost me hundreds of PIVX so I'll sending those OUT of MNs asap instead of in and pretty mad about this giant waste of time and money. Is there a spot to check each individual addresses balance while I try rebalance this back to staking? |
|
|
|
Can somebody tell me what causes the sudden interest in Litecoin? For years it was sleeping, and suddenly bumped. I know I am missing something, and did not find any direct answer on this. Btw I had some LTC, so I dont mind the price increase at all  just another pump and dump noobs being dumped upon because of segwit hype. now that it's over we have some fresh baked bagholders  and those bags will become heavier by the day of your posts have been FUD. And they've also all been wrong lol: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=937377;sa=showPosts |
|
|
|
Seqwit locked in.
Unfortunately many whales have been waiting for this moment and are unloading years worth of LTC.
The price is heading back down, expect $3 again soon.
I guess this is Litecoin's last 15 minutes of fame?
It came too close to touching God and now it has been burned.
lol gtfo dude |
|
|
|
Once the masternode gets the first block, the next ones come in turn according to the number of masternodes.
So it's a consistent 1.4 day rotation through the 2070 MNs for 1 block reward? It could be less, for example, if some other masternodes are shut down or have a misconfigured firewall perhaps. I'm not sure about the consensus algorithm for how the winning masternodes are chosen. I have had a masternode get no payments for a bit longer period and then have rewards come in more quickly. But it should average out. At the moment I count 380 masternodes that haven't received payments. I may try to collect some more data and see how the situation changes. EDIT: For me, masternode payments have started coming in after 90 hours. Ugh, I don't like that one bit. Are the rewards you're earning at less over 5 PIVX (after most recent reward reduction)? Also, is there a user friendly way to move coins within internal addresses on the controller wallet? Ex: I've generated 6 total addresses now, how can I neatly organize my PIVX into 2 addresses within my wallet? Thanks |
|
|
|
Once the masternode gets the first block, the next ones come in turn according to the number of masternodes.
So it's a consistent 1.4 day rotation through the 2070 MNs for 1 block reward? |
|
|
|
The transactions for the masternode(s) are "locked" when you start your wallet. (pivxd reads the transaction list from the masternode.conf file).
If you comment or remove those lines from the masternode.conf and restart the wallet, transactions that were reserved for the masternode will be able to stake. After those transactions stake, they will not be able to be used for a masternode so you would need to go through the process of setting up the masternode again.
I think the the block rewards would be about the same or maybe a tad more than the equivalent time staking. The three+ day wait is a bit painful considering that the block reward is scheduled to halve when we reach "PoS Phase X: [blocks 648000-Infinite] 05 PIV (90% SEESAW ~ 10% BUDGET)". Certain upgrades need a restart and then all who run masternodes need to wait some time. This is longer than before but there are more masternodes now than when I was running this before.
Myself, I had been staking for the last while since running masternodes needs a bit more effort and attention. I put some pivx back into masternodes for this upgrade a bit over 3 days ago, thinking I would get a bit more in this last month with the higher reward. It's hard to say what the best decision would be there's another 21+ days to go until the block reward halving.
With 2037 masternodes, a masternode payout should about about every 1.4 days.
Been in PIVX for a pretty long time and have been an overall big fan, but I'll admit, this MN bullshit/new wallets crashing is really pissing me off. Had to reindex and that took almost THREE days. Then shortly after a new wallet comes out. So then I decided to put 20k of my PIVX into MNs and then absolutely nothing for days and just when it's supposed to hit this arbitrary 3 day duration, the wallet crashes and 6 hours later I'm still resyncing and can't even restart my nodes yet. I'm already down hundreds in terms of USD in comparison to what I was staking and yes, knowing the block rewards will be halving soon only makes this downtime more infuriating. If MN rewards are only paid every potentially 4 days, I'm definitely out. |
|
|
|
|
Anyone have a brief summary of upcoming NEM developments/breakthroughs (ie: catapult, mijin, etc) and news and what they mean for NEM moving forward?
Trying to do one of my youtube shows on NEM and want to make sure I accurately convey what's coming for NEM. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Experienced masternoders:
Setup 2 nodes Sunday and they show on the master list and are labelled as "enabled"
How long before I receive payment (2 days and I don't think I've gotten anything yet) and how does that work? Does it display in a way that's distinguishable from staking rewards?
Thanks.
you need to wait ~3 days if the node is listed as enbaled on controller wallet and you see "status" : "Masternode successfully started" on vps just wait after updating to 2.2.0 you need to to start the node on vps too According to one of my masternodes about an hour ago, here's a list of the largest uptimes for unpaid masternodes in seconds.... 325883 325933 325984 326057 326120 326139 331264 340139 345954 408003 The last one seems to be an outlier, it's possible that it is misconfigured. (Yesterday when I looked the oldest ones were in the 360000 seconds range. At the moment, the oldest unpaid masternode was started 113 hours (4.7 days) ago and the next one 96 hours (4 days). I would say be patient and don't mess with anything if you started less than 4 days ago. Can't say for sure how long it would take if a masternode was restarted today. If you would like to check that the masternode is running ok can try running the following on the masternode. "$ pivx-cli masternode debug Masternode successfully started" If it is more than four days, you might want to have a check that how many peers are connected and that other peers are able to connect to it. Maybe someone with more technical knowledge here can could provide some more detail for things to check. I suppose... it is ok for a masternode to not have any inbound peers as long as masternodes are able to make connections to the masternode's port 51472 at its advertised IP address or TOR address. Hmmmm so on occasion masternodes can go 3-4 days without payment? And is the payment the same as the staking block rewards just approx 5-10% higher? If so, that frequency is WAY out of whack with what I was seeing during the 1-1.5 months I was staking. How do you take your coins out of a masternode and back to staking? |
|
|
|
It really means you pay 30% over the 4% gains, effectifly 1.2% over your capital. ie €1200 for €100K total capital per year.
Hmm. Well if there are any Dutch people here interested in a gay marriage of convenience hit me up. I'll split the tax savings. LMFAO |
|
|
|
Who are the owners of Poswallet? Or who are the team members?
What does anonymity has do to with legitimacy? Even Satoshi is anonymous but Bitcoin is not a scam. There maybe lots of reasons for someone to prefer to stay anonymous but that should not cast doubt on his/her integerity. Well, bitcoin wasn't a centralized online wallet/ exchange. yes this is my thought i have read horror storys of exchanges scamming and as an investor and value rising i think we should have a right to know who we are trusting with hundreds of millions of dollars... there is no real info on where the exchange is registered or the fact it everything ia hidden.. or fact they could be in north Carolina or someplace in Great Britain or some place in russia so ya would be nice to know... even more so with some places shutting exchanges down or blocking countrys A dividend payment or two will calm your nerves. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
