0.06
actual highest bid ! few hours left to go for this auction ! c'mon !  |
|
|
|
yeah ! thanx for those great pictures coin@coin !  |
|
|
|
Would both of you give me a chance to mediate with you both please?
First, both remove negative feedback for each other, then abstain from further comments for 48 hrs.
Let's cool off and I'd be happy to mediate between both after cool off period.
Deal?
this make sense .. ( good sense.) .. i just hate war ... so, i'm OK.. : Peace process .. this pocess seem having already started , by the way.. |
|
|
|
and by the way: if what you said is true , dear super moderator: why have you leave your feedback only yesterday ?
Don't act like a special snowflake, I've left over 15 ratings in the past 3 days. More will come. as the "story" was one year old ?? RE LOL  The retaliatory feedback on Vod's profile was left on March this year. Again, my feedback does not focus on the bogus escrow incident, but the unjustified retaliatory feedback with which I most definitely disagree with. Is there a time-limit that I'm not aware of for feedback? OK ... then if you tell the true: why havent you left them a bad feedback for "unjustified retaliatory feedback" too ?? ( vod ,neotox..) as these old feedbacks are completly unprooved ( as they are fake ) my feeback are not more or less "unjustified retaliatory feedback" than their ones ... at least YOU have proof ?? thank you to expose those then ! anyway , everydody has already understand ... you loose your time in justifications dude.. |
|
|
|
I've contacted him in an attempt to make peace, he continues by writing a long wall of text and posts a screenshot here before I could even read it (not to mention reply to it). -snip-
Is it time to rename the thread to "People from defcon's trust list praising defcon"? I don't see how this is relevant to me, the thread sidetracked anyways. That text is suited for a reputation thread. In the meantime (since the thread was created by neotox) he has left 3 retaliatory feedback (called Vod a scammer, called cryptodevil an alt of neotox and called neotox a "total scammer"), all of which are unjustified. I've had no issue either. All good here.
I've had a trade with him as well, however that doesn't justify his past actions. Lauda, how old are you?
Old enough to treat everyone equally, and old enough not to let people extort me into removing ratings (I was told to remove my rating in order to bid on the auction). I feel like the timing of the accusation is biased due to other activities surrounding this event.
Even if I had left it 1 month from now, it would have been "due to not selling genesis on his terms" so I figured I might as well do it right now (which is 10 days after any discussions of a potential sale). The reasoning "You can't leave a negative rating if we had a strong argument" is nonsense. Keep in mind that my feedback is focused on the retaliatory unjustified feedback by him (one is 4 months old, and the latest one is 1 day old), not the fact that he used to run a bogus escrow scam. Quote:"and is thus untrustworthy regardless of the initial accusation." hum;... i'm surprised i dont see any mentions on the untrustworthy feedbacks left against me : 1: by neotox one year ago 2: by the troll forum sheriff ( vod) 1 year ago too.. 3: by the troll who comes in this discussion yesterday in shouting " burn the witch !!! " lol and by the way: if what you said is true , dear super moderator: why have you leave your feedback only yesterday ? as the "story" was one year old ?? RE LOL  |
|
|
|
another nice attempt..  missing down part :   |
|
|
|
realy..... ??  Not sure why you think posting this puts you and a good light and Lauda not. You're the one being a threatening asshole in the above conversation. go home neotox ! i will keep your case after this ... forum sheriff ?? lol ( cryptodevil = neotox ) as you can see about this one , the auction for genesis #1 wasnt closed .... so how you said ? 10 days ago ?? ...... i let to everyone do the counts Cheesy YO!! enought shit for today ! have a nice day i think i will unfollow this thread .... nothing to see..  |
|
|
|
The discussion with him happened over 10 days ago and I have not contacted him afterwards in an attempt to buy the coin again. FALSE ! FALSE and FALSE again. you're just acting like a kid.. LOL lamentable...  Last message (IRC - laptop logs):  Definitely false. realy..... ?? as you can see about this one , the auction for genesis #1 wasnt closed .... so how you said ? 10 days ago ?? ...... i let to everyone do the counts |
|
|
|
The discussion with him happened over 10 days ago and I have not contacted him afterwards in an attempt to buy the coin again. FALSE ! FALSE and FALSE again. you're just acting like a kid.. LOL lamentable... moderator ?? you ?? let me laught ... |
|
|
|
- You are bidding on a genesis serie 2, #24 coin Antique silver plated ( only 50 made ! ) - Auction end on 15 Jul 2016 around 21:00 hours GMT+1 (French hour) - Payment: Bitcoin only, - Payment should be made directly to this adress: 1DefconumwoHrxXkQZdoyPVPS1XVWr1JtH - Starting bid: 0.1 BTC - Minimal Bid increment: 0.01 BTC -wolrdwide shipping with tracking :  - No sniping! Every bid within 15 minutes of the auction end will extend the auction by another 15 minutes.. - Winner has 24 hours to make payment. - i reserve the right to refuse or invalid any bid at my own discretion.. Happy biding ! defcon23 |
|
|
|
YO ! go jackoff with all this shit.. people who have already have trade with me knows well who i am ... i never have a trade with you ( and never will do it..) and i have soooo many better thing to do than fighting with trolls in this poor thread.. play with that ... i have better things to do poor guy... |
|
|
|
VOD , an user who left me a neg ranking in the past for absolutely no valid reason
I don't leave negative feedback for absolutely no valid reason. Try again. proof ? lol go home pupyy .... read better my ranking ... once again i have tons of trade for so many bitcoins... why would i risk destoying my own rep for wining .... let' s say around 1$ or 1.5$ in an fucking account sale ( acting as escrow) F... off. |
|
|
|
and yes.... that's not cool ....but just not more than what Lauda have done in this case...
And what was that exactly? He was impatient about buying something from you? He refused to get involved in some dispute between you and Vod? I don't understand. dispute between me and vod was one year ago... recently i have ask to Lauda if he could hep to solve it , waht he refused. untli that no problem. the rest is more interesting: i have bought a coin , which he want: i have refused to trade it at his conditions ( 25$) so, he first menace to left a bad feedback, then he left me a bad ranking , using this old story between me and vod .. ( power abuse , extortion , blackmail... call it as you want.., in anyway : BAD |
|
|
|
Posting private chat logs is not cool. There are other ways to deal with issues. I don't see any indication that the messages posted were GPG encrypted so I don't see any reason why anyone would expect those messages to stay private. There should not be any expectation that a Personal message/direct message be kept private if they are not encrypted, especially if there is no explicit request to maintain confidentiality (a privnote sent in plaintext might be an exception to this, however it is still possible that someone will intercept this). @Lauda- are the screenshots of those messages an accurate representation of what you said to defcon23 at one point? If not then what is inaccurate?
I don't think that cryptodevil is an alt of neotux, and making this claim will only be a distraction. I like how quickseller thinks that people PGP encrypt PMs on IRC  If you're having a private discussion with someone and you then later publish that discussion then it's certainly an aggressive act. It's also not clear that these screenshots aren't simply faked. Anyone can use any username on IRC and it's really not hard to do a little image editing anyway. In any case, it's not clear to me what defcon is accusing him of. If the screenshots are real then it looks like Lauda wanted to buy some item or another and was feeling impatient, then it looks like he refused to get involved in a personal dispute between Vod and defcon. what's the accusation here? yeah sure.... but as you can see in this logs ( at least the publics ones)... many other users have seen the same shit..... that's how this is easely verifiable.. and yes.... that's not cool ....but just not more than what Lauda have done in this case... |
|
|
|
I'll take a set! TX: 2b03dc6c8241e920122585a1938d67b6dda776fc0c2aad0cf11ba765787a20e9 Regards, Chris Your set is on it's way to your door Chris ! by the way, here's a nice shot of back of some assembled coins of this serie 2 !   |
|
|
|
- You are bidding on a genesis serie 2, #47 coin Antique gold plated ( only 60 made ! ) - Auction end on 15 Jul 2016 around 21:00 hours GMT+1 (French hour) - Payment: Bitcoin only, - Payment should be made directly to this adress: 1DefconumwoHrxXkQZdoyPVPS1XVWr1JtH - Starting bid: 0.05 BTC - Minimal Bid increment: 0.01 BTC -wolrdwide shipping with tracking : - No sniping! Every bid within 15 minutes of the auction end will extend the auction by another 15 minutes.. - Winner has 24 hours to make payment. - i reserve the right to refuse or invalid any bid at my own discretion.. Happy biding ! defcon23 |
|
|
|
I will take 1 spot, #b
Will update with tx within 24hrs when i have access to my wallet.
yo ! no problem.. you got slot #b |
|
|
|
Regardless of what is going on between the two of you (I don't want to comment on it, I don't want to take sides, please keep me out of it),
does this really have anything to do with Lauda being a Mod and their abilities to moderate the sections under them?
If you want to discuss this situation, why not take it to a Reputation thread about Lauda?
I haven't seen any strong arguments about Laudas ability to be a mod or the lack therof in some sites now.
Lutpin : i think a moderator" should have a little something "more.." , and dont try to abuse of his position ... that's all ... in this case, the fact of i havent xant to trade with him for this specific coin ( genesis #1 antique brass) , never should affect his judgement, or motive i any way the bad ranking he left me for a one year old issue... ) as you can read it by yourself, we has talk about it , and this not had motived any bad ranking... the reaction comes after i refused to sold him this shit coin, and by the way decided to auction it...  link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1544950.msg15536515#msg15536515as you have said by yourself,: "Lauda's going to hate you .." , and you was perfectly right... a real moderator never menaced to left a bad feedback only for this fact ... this is not fair. other precision:the "these fakes" accusations against me are for an account sale .... ( 1 account ) do you syncerly think , as i've got tons of trades for so many bitcoins , with so many users, in so many deals, i will risk my btctalk reputation for only few cents ? ( escrow fees for 1 account sale ? ) ..... i let you think to this .. |
|
|
|
Posting private chat logs is not cool. There are other ways to deal with issues. and you think what Lauda's have done is cool ... ? come back to reality dude and trust me ... that's cool in comparaison to the following ..... . |
|
|
|
the problem about VOD feedback The problem with VOD's feedback? It references a thread where evidence was presented which proved you were 'pulling a QS' and self-escrowing your own alt's trades. Where is the 'problem', other than the fact it rightly causes people to think twice about wanting to trade with you? wrong : thre's no evidence ;. indeed , as it's fake :: where are your evidences ? lol go back home neotox.. you're off topic .. ( and by the way: welcome to my ignore list ..) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
