It is wrong to say the bank is not against bitcoin because if you refer to what I experienced a few years ago when I worked at one of the private banks they clearly did not like the bitcoin scheme and indirectly provided a doctrine that there were indeed differences in understanding that were different between the bank system adopted by bitcoin which of course this made a competition because even though the purpose of bitcoin was not as a competitor to the bank but still there would be such an assumption.
No doubt I also previously hated bitcoin because I was part of the bank even though I was only a small worker there so it was wrong to say the bank did not like and oppose it, it's just that they also couldn't do anything about it because all regulations ultimately did not come from the bank but from the government and the bank could not take care of other problems such as bitcoin because in the end they also had their own duties.
In this case everything refers back to the government but why the government is silent without any more treatment because it goes back to the main problem where bitcoin is currently decentralized and forever like that so the government will not be able to interfere further except maybe stigmatizing and making some buzz so that bitcoin is considered bad but that also ultimately does not have a big impact on bitcoin.
I myself has already experienced this. Months ago, I was in a bank trying to open an account, but when they found out that one of my sources of income is from bitcoin investment, they really become honest with me that if ever unusual amount of deposits will be seen in my account, they’ll close the account with prior notice. So from there, I realized that banks are not actually friendly with bitcoin, even if you are putting high amount of deposits in their bank. Although it’s not the bank that can be totally blame here, but knowing banks are slaves of the government, still I end up hating that bank’s policy that’s too unfair for bitcoin.No doubt I also previously hated bitcoin because I was part of the bank even though I was only a small worker there so it was wrong to say the bank did not like and oppose it, it's just that they also couldn't do anything about it because all regulations ultimately did not come from the bank but from the government and the bank could not take care of other problems such as bitcoin because in the end they also had their own duties.
In this case everything refers back to the government but why the government is silent without any more treatment because it goes back to the main problem where bitcoin is currently decentralized and forever like that so the government will not be able to interfere further except maybe stigmatizing and making some buzz so that bitcoin is considered bad but that also ultimately does not have a big impact on bitcoin.