If the house edge is negative just bet static bets, lets say 0.001 bets all the time
With a chance of 51% of win you would eventually reach that chance and for example in 1 million bets
you would win 510.000 and lose 490.000 bets
wich means that you won 20.000 bets more than loses 20.000 x 0.001 = 20 bitcoins
There is no argument that would encourage a casino to use a nagative house edge after this post.
So I think everything has already been said after the seceond post in this thread...
Well after that post OP tried to break that strategy saying that the casino would not have an automatic betting system and the bets would be slow wich doesnt do anything but slow the process, whats mind blowing is how people voted that the casino would still win because people would be greedy, like it doesnt even matter as long as someone intelligent does that since he would be profiting forever.
Yeah, I finally made it... Read your post and seem to have understood it!
Since that post I significantly revised a casino strategy for the negative house edge, and, what is important, in respect to "the bets being slow which doesn't do anything but slow the process". In fact, now I suggest a changeable house edge (which would surely lure in new users), depending on either the betting speed or house profit (the latter was not my idea, with all due credit)...