2 GUNMEN KILLED OUTSIDE MUHAMMAD CARTOON CONTEST

[hilariousandco]

I don't know. I think it's real. If he's not supposed to be Muhammed, then why is he holding that sword/knife?

That's photoshopped too. This is the original:

[J. J. Phillips]

That one looks fake to me. You can see it starting at the thorny crown. And that microphone...

Besides, it doesn't even make sense. The right to offend Christians? No one's even questioning that. It would be bizarre. I'm pretty sure this one's the real one.

I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. We can probably both agree that it was close to the line when Ricky Gervais' said Muhammed was an "illiterate violent paedophile pigfucker." I absolutely agree with his right to say it, but was it really helpful at a time like this? I'm not sure.

[hilariousandco]

That one looks fake to me. You can see it starting at the thorny crown. And that microphone...

I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. We can probably both agree that it was close to the line when Ricky Gervais' said Muhammed was an "illiterate violent paedophile pigfucker." I absolutely agree with his right to say it, but was it really helpful at a time like this? I'm not sure.

You can disagree all you want but you'd be wrong: http://blog.newhumanist.org.uk/2011/08/ricky-gervais-on-cover-of-septoct-issue.html

http://www.christianpost.com/news/atheist-ricky-gervais-crucified-comedians-controversial-magazine-cover-54329/

The September/October issue of the magazine features Gervais shirtless, but in jeans, holding a mic stand across his back as if he was being crucified. The words “atheist” in all capital letters are written above his chest in blood. A crown of thorns also adorns his head.

[J. J. Phillips]

That one looks fake to me. You can see it starting at the thorny crown. And that microphone...

Besides, it doesn't even make sense. The right to offend Christians? No one's even questioning that. It would be bizarre. I'm pretty sure this one's the real one.

I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. We can probably both agree that it was close to the line when Ricky Gervais' said Muhammed was an "illiterate violent paedophile pigfucker." I absolutely agree with his right to say it, but was it really helpful at a time like this? I'm not sure.

You can disagree all you want but you'd be wrong: http://blog.newhumanist.org.uk/2011/08/ricky-gervais-on-cover-of-septoct-issue.html

http://www.christianpost.com/news/atheist-ricky-gervais-crucified-comedians-controversial-magazine-cover-54329/

The September/October issue of the magazine features Gervais shirtless, but in jeans, holding a mic stand across his back as if he was being crucified. The words “atheist” in all capital letters are written above his chest in blood. A crown of thorns also adorns his head.

Looks more like an attempt to cover up the blasphemy against Islam to me. I guess I can understand them wanting to retcon it. I mean, people do get killed over mocking Islam and not Christianity. It makes sense that they'd try to cover this up.

[Wilikon]

Breaking: FBI KNEW Terrorist Was Heading to Garland, TX – DID NOT Notify Organizers (VIDEO)


The FBI knew one of the gunmen in Sunday’s attack in Texas could be targeting the controversial Mohammad cartoon contest, anti-Islam conference… And they knew it hours before the attack occurred. That comes straight from the FBI director who just moments ago held a closed door meeting with reporters. The FBI put out a bulletin with suspect’s picture before the attack. He said it’s not clear if police in Garland, Texas knew about that bulletin.

I reached out to Pamela Geller Friday morning.
Here is what she said:

Q: Pamela were you notified by the FBI or local officials that terrorist Elton Simpson was heading your way?

Pamela Geller: No, we were not.

Q: Were your security officials notified?

Pamela Geller: No.






https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cq8gA9LNFgk