Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 05:45:09 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Requesting theymos to remove CanaryInTheMine from DefaultTrust  (Read 15746 times)
SpanishSoldier (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 255


View Profile
March 07, 2015, 10:01:11 PM
 #241

Now as FriedCat is missing with more than a million dollar, can we expect CanaryInTheMine to be removed from DefaultTrust ? FriedCat is still seating happily in Canary's trust list. Or this time also Canary will get away just by removing him from the trust list like it happened for Mabshark ?

the lost of FC or any malicious thing done by FC isnt the fault of CITM, CITM could remove him from his list , infact, CITM should do some task to sort out his trust list


It has been months that CITM was requested to do so by many people on this forum. His inaction clearly shows he does not want to do that (Well, I understand the intention, but as I dont have direct proof, I wont talk about it). Now babysitting FriedCat and many other people who are supporting AM hash & HaveLock even after a million dollar scam, must be rectified. So, the first step is to demote CITM to trust level 2. He'll still have the power to make people Green/Red. But, he wont have the power to give the power to scammers to make other people Green/Red. I think, DefaultTrust need to have pure people. Not the ones whose trusted ones are involved in million dollar scam.

Funny thing is, CITM doesn't show up in my trust network due to people in my trust list excluding him being > the people who include him.

Everyone relying on the Default set by the forum is inheriting CITM trust. Is that good ?
nubbins
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1009



View Profile
March 08, 2015, 04:31:57 PM
 #242

pure people

 Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

What is wrong with all of you?

There are no pure people.

No longer buying/selling Casascius coins. Beware scammers.
My OTC Web of Trust ratings / What's a PGP chain of custody?
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2884
Merit: 2327


View Profile
March 11, 2015, 02:34:00 PM
 #243

I think it is interesting to see that CITM has so many people on his trust list that gave positive trust to FC that he still has 150 trust even with two negatives.

It is also interesting that everyone except two people are on CITM's trust list that gave FC positive trust (a few are on others trust as well)
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
March 11, 2015, 02:41:05 PM
Last edit: March 11, 2015, 03:08:13 PM by TECSHARE
 #244

Now as FriedCat is missing with more than a million dollar, can we expect CanaryInTheMine to be removed from DefaultTrust ? FriedCat is still seating happily in Canary's trust list. Or this time also Canary will get away just by removing him from the trust list like it happened for Mabshark ?

the lost of FC or any malicious thing done by FC isnt the fault of CITM, CITM could remove him from his list , infact, CITM should do some task to sort out his trust list


It has been months that CITM was requested to do so by many people on this forum. His inaction clearly shows he does not want to do that (Well, I understand the intention, but as I dont have direct proof, I wont talk about it). Now babysitting FriedCat and many other people who are supporting AM hash & HaveLock even after a million dollar scam, must be rectified. So, the first step is to demote CITM to trust level 2. He'll still have the power to make people Green/Red. But, he wont have the power to give the power to scammers to make other people Green/Red. I think, DefaultTrust need to have pure people. Not the ones whose trusted ones are involved in million dollar scam.

Funny thing is, CITM doesn't show up in my trust network due to people in my trust list excluding him being > the people who include him.

Everyone relying on the Default set by the forum is inheriting CITM trust. Is that good ?

It is amazing how Theymos, Badbear, etc are willing to allow thieves responsible for stealing over $1 million stay on the trust list, and users like Nubbins who think the default trust is his personal tool for extortion and retribution over and over https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=935984.msg10702253#msg10702253 to stay on the default trust list while other users are removed for individual petty incidents with no actual accusations of scamming even. It is pretty clear that the default trust list exists to PROTECT scammers and to punish anyone who exposes them. There is no other reason for such obvious selective enforcement to be applied to it. Theymos and company hide under this veil of justness and "rule of law", but then when it comes time to apply those same standards to their personal pals, there is always silence at best or attacks on the person pointing it out.

Canaryinthemine needs to be removed from the default trust list, he has clearly demonstrated his desire to leave people on his trust list who are thieves and regularly abuse the system for personal gain. Its funny how Theymos will personally go around asking users to remove me from the default trust for a single misunderstanding over an incident, yet some one steals a million dollars and he suddenly has nothing to say! If there is no rule of law for those in charge, it is just a matter of time before no one respects any of the rules.

P.S. I find it extremely telling that Canaryinthemine found time to add the op of this thread to his excluded trust list, but magically can't find the time to do the same for some one responsible for the theft of over a million dollars. CITM thinks his position on the default trust is for his own personal benefit, not a tool for the community to use to see who deals honestly.
MarbleBoss
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 169
Merit: 110


View Profile
March 19, 2015, 11:11:41 AM
 #245

this thread is becoming ridiculous.

it's fun though..... Amazed at the title change, remove CITM from deault trust..... madness.

What was madness three months ago is now a reality. Amazing how time changes everything...

I'm being really stupid I know, but can someone tell me where CITM is, because I can't find him  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;full

That's where he was, he's now been removed. I'll lock this thread in a few days or when it stops being useful. Any follow on issues can have their own thread.
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2884
Merit: 2327


View Profile
September 11, 2015, 04:25:25 AM
 #246

I think the main problem is that the trust system has given members that haven't proven themselves responsible enough the ability to mark someone's account with negative trust, and essentially ruin the account.

Any inaccuracies will eventually be fixed. I'm not going to allow the default trust network to contain inaccurate ratings for long.
Is this statement still accurate? If so then what is the definition of "long"
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!