3 separate posts on separate threads deleted - which mods and who reported?

[LoyceV]

Perhaps you should post the deleted posts, the thread they were in and why you believe they follow the rules.

From modlog:

Delete reply: Re: Who exactly told theymos to change the threshold to 250 cycled merits? in topic #5115304 by member #92110
Delete reply: Re: Candidate for Ban appeal in topic #5113829 by member #92110
Delete reply: Re: There should be a public general elections on the DTs in topic #5104397 by member #92110

Unfortunately, modlog doesn't show the post numbers, and since cryptohunter creates so many posts, it's more work to dig them up from my files.

[Jet Cash]

I think suchmoon's avatar is a true representation. Big ears to hear everything, big eyes to see everything, and sharp teeth to chew up dodgy posts. I wish I had the creative talent to construct a suitable image.

[suchmoon]

Unfortunately, modlog doesn't show the post numbers, and since cryptohunter creates so many posts, it's more work to dig them up from my files.

Try these:

49968121
49958625
49959316
49673030
49672667
49534123

[LoyceV]

49968121
49958625
49959316
49673030
49672667
49534123

Raw unedited posts:

Code:

cryptohunter
92110
49534123
<a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#4">Other</a> / <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=24.0">Meta</a> / <b><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5104914.msg49534123#msg49534123">Re: Imagine topics where you could jump to posts of Value only</a></b>

<br />This could be the case so this is why you would jump to the post with the next valuable post button and you can look for the context. However since it should be largely on topic and relevant to the OP and also they usually quote what they are responding too then it should still work well.

Code:

cryptohunter
92110
49672667
<a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#4">Other</a> / <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=24.0">Meta</a> / <b><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5107640.msg49672667#msg49672667">Re: Theymos can you explain your reasoning on merit allocated on a political basis.</a></b>

<br />You gave the POST merit. You can give a post merit that has one piece you like and then goes on to make a bunch of false assumptions and political rantings. The merit endorses the entire post. <br /><br />You must quote the entire post that you merited. It was a tired of political ranting from a proven untrustworthy sock puppet sneaky racist trolling sig spammer.<br /><br />I mean you do realise Huge Black Woman is aka the pharmacist do you not?

Code:

cryptohunter
92110
49673030
<a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#3">Economy</a> / <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=129.0">Reputation</a> / <b><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106712.msg49673030#msg49673030">Re: @suchmoon could you provide info on this</a></b>

<br />Has this screen shot been proven a Fake?<br /><br />Are you claiming that the area there is not your own. IE the city and zip are incorrect? Is this the basis you call it a fake?<br /><br />

Code:

cryptohunter
92110
49958625
<a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#4">Other</a> / <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=24.0">Meta</a> / <b><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5113829.msg49958625#msg49958625">Re: Candidate for Ban appeal</a></b>

(post was empty or only a quote)

Code:

cryptohunter
92110
49959316
<a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#3">Economy</a> / <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=129.0">Reputation</a> / <b><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5104397.msg49959316#msg49959316">Re: There should be a public general elections on the DTs</a></b>

<br />LOL<br /><br />HUGE BLACK WOMAN <b>aka</b> the sock puppet of that greedy sneaky racist troll the pharmacist who currently enjoys using this gamed and broken system to be both a DT and a Merit source.<br /><br />This useless troll has never made any contribution here accept &quot; to be on a highly paid sig campaign &quot; &nbsp;<br /><br />This turd is a petty sig spammer and will not provide any examples of his original thought inspiring posts because there are NONE.<br /><br />The 2 weeks has been nice a quiet because I am relaxing on my vacation which luckily for you is going to be continuing for quite some time since I have no had an extended vacation for some time.<br /><br />However if your past is not going to delete itself. It will be there to highlight over and over again upon my return.<br /><br />Of course he does not want anything to change here. Where else do you get to be a proven greedy untrustworthy useless scum bag and yet get to be in a position or trust and one worthy of endorsing others actions ??<br /><br />

Code:

cryptohunter
92110
49968121
<a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#4">Other</a> / <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=24.0">Meta</a> / <b><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5115304.msg49968121#msg49968121">Re: Who exactly told theymos to change the threshold to 250 cycled merits?</a></b>

<br />@trannidung<br /><br />What about dung posters? <br />