I'm wondering how long the 1xbet signature campaign will last when all of their participants have a negative rating. This is an experience for them I believe, and if it will be successful, then other gambling sites with bad reputations might follow the system of 1xbit.
They are now live in their first week, some campaigns have a trial for at least 1 month.
One wonders why it wouldn't be conducive in this free-for-all environment to simply start up a new gambling site every week (or even day) to post a thread on the forum, put out some signature campaign
*, and continually exit scam gamblers
^ on account of the lack of prerequisites to freely advertise on this site. Alongside how alt accounts of rulebreakers are effectively unpunished until found by forum members (if even that, given time delays and manual checks) and how long members persist and have presence despite negative feedback/reputation... we're living in a time of blissful ignorance.
Plus, no one who comes upon a new thread in the gambling section (guest or not) will receive any warning about established/unestablished sites. Best you have is viewing the yellow flag as a guest (i.e.
1xbit) though I would expect it to be displayed in a more pronounced manner. If you expect guests to have no idea about the forum dynamics, what's to say they haven't simply skimmed past the yellow flag as a rare occurrence?
As it currently stands, the post-hoc deterrence of flags seems like a roundabout prevention mechanism especially without any limit to account, thread, post, or scam creation. Oh well: we can keep tagging people who scam for a few hundred bucks.
* optional exit scam for greater profit efficiency
^ also collect free KYC to scam even more