This is probably the most comprehensive document to detail Faketoshi's blunders yet. I feel compelled to read the whole thing but will have to settle for chunks at a time. Thanks for sharing this.
Here's some snippets where the judge explains why he concludes Faketoshi is not Satoshi, which are concise & hard to disagree with:
Satoshi would be most unlikely to have any real difficulty in proving he was Satoshi.
...
I do not believe that Satoshi would ever have resorted to forgery in his attempt to prove he was Satoshi.
...
the contemporaneous materials written by Satoshi, including the White Paper, the posts and his email exchanges with individuals, convey an impression of a calm, knowledgeable, collaborative, precise person with little or no arrogance, willing to acknowledge and implement ideas and suggestions from others who had shown an interest in Bitcoin.
...
due to his collaborative and non-confrontational nature, I consider it is most unlikely that Satoshi would ever have resorted to litigation against the Developers.
My hopium was blasted to smithereens. I still think BSV is superior.
That's fine. However, you must concede that this take aged poorly:
Craig is going to win this COPA trial and there's going to be a lot of cope here.
BSV down 6% in a week when almost everything else is up.