[...]
The main reason you will not be shown the evidence is so they do not educate you on how to cheat them later. Even if you open a case with casinoguru or askgambler, you will not be shown the information. 100% guaranteed.
Hmm... very close with a point I wanted to raise while I mind-drafted my reply while I tinkered with this annoying new wireless keyboard. I guess now I have an immersive understanding of what the arbitrators on CG and AG experienced.
there is no dilemma here.
You have evidence in your hands that I know nothing about. Most likely, it has nothing to do with me at all and is fake.
Although no, I know that it is extremely subjective, because you give me a chance to challenge it.
So what happens? I will be recognized as a multi-account if I don't guess!
And what should I guess?
I probably need to close the topic with the last message - DIDN'T GUESS WHAT NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED.
And don't you think that if I guess your evidence, then this will indicate my connection with other accounts? Because it is simply impossible to guess?!
This can be compared to the ancient Enquisition, when a witch was thrown tied up into a river and if she drowned, then she was innocent, and if she floated, then she was a witch. In any case, the person had no chance to survive.
I don't understand one thing:
1. Will yahoo62278 comment on the bookmaker's evidence? Or holydarkness prohibited from passing this on to yahoo62278 ?
2. Will you try to verify in any way that the bookmaker's evidence has any bearing on me? Why can you even accept his comments as truth?
Oh wow, I guess I learned something new today through direct experience.
I guess this is why when multi-acc being the basis of casino's counter-accusation, they choose not to trouble themselves too much and simply ask the complainant to choose an ADR where they'll provide the evidence. As well as why the ADR, far as I know, most likely than not will made a statement like "we've reviewed the evidence given by the casino and can confirm the sign of multi-account and found that the casino act accordingly" or something like that.
Because when multi-acc being involved, there is not much that need or can be done. It's pretty much closed case once evidence was given to the third eyes. What can the complainant show to dispute proof of connection?
And no, it's not like witch inquisition, I think. On Salem, they just point fingers and throw the woman into the fiery stake with the proof of witchcraft itself is them surviving fire, thus the proof is obtainable and verifiable after the result. This case, the proof are given before.
They study the behavior, verify it with evidence and cross-checks, and only then they "execute" the witches.
So, the difference with inquisition, during inquisition, the witches were tied to the post because they suspect them of practicing witchcraft and if they survive, then that's the proof, this case of yours, they found that you can stir your cup of tea with the flick of your nose, walk through platform 9-3/4, and have a pet dragon, then they decorate you with bonfire.
Weird choice of comparison, by the way.
I don't understand one thing:
1. Will yahoo62278 comment on the bookmaker's evidence? Or holydarkness prohibited from passing this on to yahoo62278 ?
2. Will you try to verify in any way that the bookmaker's evidence has any bearing on me? Why can you even accept his comments as truth?
1. I have not get a written agreement from BK8, and I will not share without their consent. They entrusted me to verify only, not to share. That's their evidence, not mine.
2. Since yahoo is yet to see what I see, then question 2 is still unanswerable. If that's addressed to me, though, why I can accept their comments as truth... well, they do provide me with something solid.
