UNESCO declares Islam as the most peaceful religion of the world

[Malsetid]

Bahahahahaha lmao omg I am actually laughing out loud at work, people think I am crazy.  THE MOST PEACEFUL BHAHAHAHAHAHA omg wow. just wow.

If you took the time to read whole OP you would have seen it's not a real statement

It's just a hoax, and anyway I don't see why UNESCO would make any statement about a religion status.
That's not its role.

Yuuup that's right. Talking about religion, especially something that would put one over the other, would generate much controversy and i think unesco people are smarter to think about that. There's no basis as to which is better or which is more peaceful. Violence is already in human's nature and it doesnt matter which religion you belong to.

[Sithara007]

Bahahahahaha lmao omg I am actually laughing out loud at work, people think I am crazy.  THE MOST PEACEFUL BHAHAHAHAHAHA omg wow. just wow.

If you took the time to read whole OP you would have seen it's not a real statement

It's just a hoax, and anyway I don't see why UNESCO would make any statement about a religion status.
That's not its role.

Yuuup that's right. Talking about religion, especially something that would put one over the other, would generate much controversy and i think unesco people are smarter to think about that. There's no basis as to which is better or which is more peaceful. Violence is already in human's nature and it doesnt matter which religion you belong to.

The article was first published in some satire site, but it was soon copied by the mainstream news papers in various Islamic nations (especially those in Pakistan). This is not an isolated incident. Happens quite often out there.

[StefanReed]

Bahahahahaha lmao omg I am actually laughing out loud at work, people think I am crazy.  THE MOST PEACEFUL BHAHAHAHAHAHA omg wow. just wow.

If you took the time to read whole OP you would have seen it's not a real statement

It's just a hoax, and anyway I don't see why UNESCO would make any statement about a religion status.
That's not its role.

Yuuup that's right. Talking about religion, especially something that would put one over the other, would generate much controversy and i think unesco people are smarter to think about that. There's no basis as to which is better or which is more peaceful. Violence is already in human's nature and it doesnt matter which religion you belong to.

The article was first published in some satire site, but it was soon copied by the mainstream news papers in various Islamic nations (especially those in Pakistan). This is not an isolated incident. Happens quite often out there.

I also agree with you that it is a fake. After making ISIS in Syria, I do wonder if Islam will be recognized as the most aggressive religion in the world, but it is not the function of UNESCO. Their task is to guard the culture of the world which the Muslims destroyed.

[Tyrantt]

wow such a great news to wake up to...hm, last couple of big events had islam as a partial or main thing. Why's islam so popular all of a sudden?

But this... I don't know, it's stupid... Maybe they're trying to fix the migrant situation like this..

[Sithara007]

wow such a great news to wake up to...hm, last couple of big events had islam as a partial or main thing. Why's islam so popular all of a sudden?

But this... I don't know, it's stupid... Maybe they're trying to fix the migrant situation like this..

In the Western nations, the leftist liberals have always used Islam as a tool to counter the conservatives (who mostly rely on Christian values). This explains the undue importance given to Islam by the mainstream media and politicians.

[Challenger2015]

wow such a great news to wake up to...hm, last couple of big events had islam as a partial or main thing. Why's islam so popular all of a sudden?

But this... I don't know, it's stupid... Maybe they're trying to fix the migrant situation like this..

In the Western nations, the leftist liberals have always used Islam as a tool to counter the conservatives (who mostly rely on Christian values). This explains the undue importance given to Islam by the mainstream media and politicians.

Of course you may be right, but that you describe the methods of struggle. do you deny that Muslims are indeed very far from Christianity. They are less educated and more aggressive and absolutely not tolerant of other religions.

[Mometaskers]

I can't believe this. Do they have their heads stuck up their butts? They may say what they want but they can't deny that it lends itself to violence rather easily. When a fundamentalist Christian use Old Testament verses to encourage stuff like violence and discrimination the moderates can always point out opposing New Testament verses. The opposite is the case in Islam... all the violence are at the end. Extremists can always say that the newer revelations are more important.

Christians promoting peace can always point out to Jesus's gestures like preventing his followers from attacking arresting Roman officers. Muslim moderates would have a hard time arguing with terrorists claiming they're only emulating Mohammed when Mohammed went around waging war and beheading infidels, even going so far as promising people safe passage - only to ambush and behead them all.

[Spendulus]

I can't believe this. Do they have their heads stuck up their butts? They may say what they want but they can't deny that it lends itself to violence rather easily. When a fundamentalist Christian use Old Testament verses to encourage stuff like violence and discrimination the moderates can always point out opposing New Testament verses. The opposite is the case in Islam... all the violence are at the end. Extremists can always say that the newer revelations are more important.

Christians promoting peace can always point out to Jesus's gestures like preventing his followers from attacking arresting Roman officers. Muslim moderates would have a hard time arguing with terrorists claiming they're only emulating Mohammed when Mohammed went around waging war and beheading infidels, even going so far as promising people safe passage - only to ambush and behead them all.

Lying to further the goals of Islam is standard practice.

"Takiyya."

[Sithara007]

wow such a great news to wake up to...hm, last couple of big events had islam as a partial or main thing. Why's islam so popular all of a sudden?

But this... I don't know, it's stupid... Maybe they're trying to fix the migrant situation like this..

In the Western nations, the leftist liberals have always used Islam as a tool to counter the conservatives (who mostly rely on Christian values). This explains the undue importance given to Islam by the mainstream media and politicians.

Of course you may be right, but that you describe the methods of struggle. do you deny that Muslims are indeed very far from Christianity. They are less educated and more aggressive and absolutely not tolerant of other religions.

It is true that today's Islam is very different from all the other religions. The reason for that is very simple. The other religions progressed with time. Even Christianity had the burning of witches and all that many hundreds of years ago. But they were successful in purging these evil customs. But look at Islam. They are still stoning women to death and amputating the limbs of thieves.

[Spendulus]

....But look at Islam. They are still stoning women to death and amputating the limbs of thieves.

And they're proud of it.

[youdamushi]

I can't believe this. Do they have their heads stuck up their butts? They may say what they want but they can't deny that it lends itself to violence rather easily. When a fundamentalist Christian use Old Testament verses to encourage stuff like violence and discrimination the moderates can always point out opposing New Testament verses. The opposite is the case in Islam... all the violence are at the end. Extremists can always say that the newer revelations are more important.

Christians promoting peace can always point out to Jesus's gestures like preventing his followers from attacking arresting Roman officers. Muslim moderates would have a hard time arguing with terrorists claiming they're only emulating Mohammed when Mohammed went around waging war and beheading infidels, even going so far as promising people safe passage - only to ambush and behead them all.

You can't believe this for the simple reason it's not true.
Whatever, I don't even think it would be possible.
That's just not the role of UNESCO to make such declarations.

[signature200]

wow such a great news to wake up to...hm, last couple of big events had islam as a partial or main thing. Why's islam so popular all of a sudden?

But this... I don't know, it's stupid... Maybe they're trying to fix the migrant situation like this..

In the Western nations, the leftist liberals have always used Islam as a tool to counter the conservatives (who mostly rely on Christian values). This explains the undue importance given to Islam by the mainstream media and politicians.

Of course you may be right, but that you describe the methods of struggle. do you deny that Muslims are indeed very far from Christianity. They are less educated and more aggressive and absolutely not tolerant of other religions.

It is true that today's Islam is very different from all the other religions. The reason for that is very simple. The other religions progressed with time. Even Christianity had the burning of witches and all that many hundreds of years ago. But they were successful in purging these evil customs. But look at Islam. They are still stoning women to death and amputating the limbs of thieves.

I disagree with you. When the reason was only in the inner traditions of Islamic countries it would be possible to wait, but they walk with their misanthropic customs around the world. There is a creeping expansion. If you do not pay attention to this phenomenon, then improved mildness to be late.

[Barbarian]

If I remember right, Saudi Arabia is the head of the UN human rights section so I'm not surprised 

Since the end of world war II in all the international institutions infiltrated corruption and politics. They have ceased to perform their functions and it seems to me that if they do not change, they will cease to exist.

Interesting perspective, who would make the UN cease to exist. If all these countries subscribe to or tolerate the "infiltration" as you call it and continue to show up for the meetings, who will actually end it?

Any political body that does not perform it is function will eventually disappear, may be not today or tomorrow but eventually, that was what happen to the previous version of the UN and once the UN fails to accomplish its mission it will disappear.