|
May 11, 2019, 11:50:20 AM |
|
The choice of the target from my point of view has come down to two options - 512 and 1024. 256 is clearly scaled 2 times 512, there is absolutely no difference between them, only twice more beautiful digits. Above 1024, it is also meaningless to consider the same scaling twice.
But the difference between 1024 and 512 is fundamental.
1024 One computer - one voice, as Satoshi bequeathed. The speed almost does not depend on the type and number of processors and cores in the computer. The maximum speed is achieved with a minimum processor load, it is convenient to mine in parallel with the main work. A good option for mining in the office network.
512 Who spends resources - that one wins. The number of hardware cores in the computer plays a crucial role. The more cores, the higher the hashrate. Maximum speed is reached with maximum CPU load. Mine profitable only on dedicated servers with a large number of cores. Ideal for powerful modern servers with free resources.
Now we have to choose - we are voting for socialism (equality in income for all) or capitalism (the more expenses - the higher the income).
|