Who dump coins early; Bounty hunters or ICO investors?

[saminnala]

I do not think that only Bounty hunters are to blame for the collapse of the coins, since they receive coins much later than investors. During this time, most coins are already trading below ICO prices. The first to bring down the price of investors, and Bounty hunters in the end completely finish off this altcoin.

[CleverOracle]

ICO investors are the last sellers who want to dump the price of their ICO investment. Bounty hunters are the first sellers who do not care about the price because they earned tokens for "free".

It happens on most cases but if the bounty distribution is delay based on what OP said and you see a price dumping on the coin then it means that some of the ICO investors want a quick profit or maybe the dumping came from what they called "tokenswap" these are the holders who have a big amount of tokens that get via partnership of the project.

[joybella]

Everyone that sees the opportunity to dump dumps it first. If the investors grts their tokens first which is the normal thing they sell. There ain't nothing like dumping you sell to get your investment back ot cut loss.

[yescrypto]

I think both of them, the thing is if a project is listed on exchange and it exceed the ico price that's when the investors start dumping theirs and it results to the worst of the dump because they have enough to dump, and if it is the other way around that's when you find the bounty hunters doing their thing as far it pays for their efforts.

[ElenaN]

As it seems to me, neither bounty hunters nor investors benefit from the coins they received that dropped in value, so I think these people can be excluded!

[Lagduf]

I think both of them, the thing is if a project is listed on exchange and it exceed the ico price that's when the investors start dumping theirs and it results to the worst of the dump because they have enough to dump, and if it is the other way around that's when you find the bounty hunters doing their thing as far it pays for their efforts.

Especially for the early investors just like those have participated in the pre-sale that acquired a huge bonus and then they cna dump it even the price of coin or token was getting the ico price.
That should be considered as the first party which started to dump their money.

[Olatunjex]

Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys

Investors have larger percentage of the token issued during an ico, investors dump token more then bounty hunters, likewise some greedy team as well dump token value sometimes especially teams with no intension of developing the project for a long time.