Limited participants is the best option for bounty campaigns this days

[Mighty_crypt]

Just note that limited of unlimited doesn't clear the fact that you might not get paid in the end, this doesn't mean the project is legit or not, its better to do better research before giving a try, bounties are still all about luck but limited participants gives hope to more rewards

[joshua123]

Because projects favor as many as participants that will join for their campaign. Actually it sucks that the process is like that. Lucky are those who have enough merits that can join those btc paid campaign cause  the participants there are limited and they got paid by btc. I am an altcoin fanatics and joined many campaigns in the past. I recall the same process since then, but the problem now is hunters are increasing but the cmapaign are not. So we dont have much choice but to participate on single campaign full of participants.

[brotherwood12]

agree , some bounty are just paying 5-10$ max for 3 month work , that really sad , its like real bounty when you try to sign up as soon as possible xd

[kapalmabur]

It seems many new bounty hunters are joining this forum weekly or monthly, every single bounty campaign is full of thousands of participants, my claim is some bounty managers don't care how many you really are, even if it's just 5$ for each bounty participants, this is plain bad, I remember telling bubbalex to reduce Cartesi signature participants and I'm glad he listened, if not the reward would be very bad....

indeed there should be a limit for bounty participants, especially those who follow social media bounties,
such as Facebook and Twitter participation can be up to 1000 more, I think it will be bad, because prizes will be divided a little

[poodle63]

agree , some bounty are just paying 5-10$ max for 3 month work , that really sad , its like real bounty when you try to sign up as soon as possible xd

It caused by the price didn't meet what already speculated or expected by the hunters. I remember sometimes the creator of bounty mentioned a huge value for each token but the reality will be very different.

it's good to give limitation but it will be much better if there will be a fixed allocation.

[Dpat]

Yes, definitely this option for the bounty participation offered by the project promoter is best. This because of the reward accumulation will be a decent amount for the bounty hunter. If the number of participants decrease then they reward amount will increase proportionally.

[jcpone]

It seems many new bounty hunters are joining this forum weekly or monthly, every single bounty campaign is full of thousands of participants, my claim is some bounty managers don't care how many you really are, even if it's just 5$ for each bounty participants, this is plain bad, I remember telling bubbalex to reduce Cartesi signature participants and I'm glad he listened, if not the reward would be very bad....

That's true, it make sense to me. The more participants listed in the bounty campaign, is more chances to each of them to earn small in the end for sure after their project finish. But the more few of the participants join with it, is the higher chances for them to earn good to promote the project as well, but that's only if the project will become successful in the end.

[Furryball]

It seems many new bounty hunters are joining this forum weekly or monthly, every single bounty campaign is full of thousands of participants, my claim is some bounty managers don't care how many you really are, even if it's just 5$ for each bounty participants, this is plain bad, I remember telling bubbalex to reduce Cartesi signature participants and I'm glad he listened, if not the reward would be very bad....

Good post, this deserves merit, we can't stop new bounty hunters from joining any projects they like but bounty managers can actually limit the participants so that the reward will make sense, when too much bounty hunters join a bounty campaign they get pennies in the end

[pilosopotasyo]

If a campaign has low reward with unlimited participants, I will rather buy the token when listed on exchange than to stress myself for the bounty activities only to get a useless reward. BM must ensure they limit participants

It's a good option, and it will fully support the development of the project, but bounty rewards are still desirable because it's a free token with minimal work, not everyone here can buy a token because they lack the funds especially in this time of the pandemic and bounty hunting is the answer.

[leea-1334]

If a campaign has low reward with unlimited participants, I will rather buy the token when listed on exchange than to stress myself for the bounty activities only to get a useless reward. BM must ensure they limit participants

Actually it simply does not matter either way. Unlimited participants or limited, as long as bounties are just valueless actions where people do not even have any need to engage properly or even use the product? Just give it up. Token economics do not matter as much in these cases to me.

[Ryushin]

I will be very happy if bounty managers can start limiting bounty participants from their bounty campaigns, it's sad to promote projects for months and get 20$, this happens because of crowdy hunters looking to get their own piece of the pie

[Jocuserious]

Seems to me better 100-150 participate for signature campaign after others social media. Actually i like to thank a limit participate bounty with weekly/monthly payment. However, you can shouldn't those bounty unlimited participate with lots of rewards. because it's just a project greedy thinking after that there has no value in crypto market.

[gwaposakon]

It seems many new bounty hunters are joining this forum weekly or monthly, every single bounty campaign is full of thousands of participants, my claim is some bounty managers don't care how many you really are, even if it's just 5$ for each bounty participants, this is plain bad, I remember telling bubbalex to reduce Cartesi signature participants and I'm glad he listened, if not the reward would be very bad....

Indeed fewer bounty participants would be more rewarding on campaigns as only a few would divide the rewards. But I think projects want many participants as it would mean wider opportunity to market the project. But if you want fewer participants, you can choose bounty campaigns like the signature, translation, or content creation that only few are qualified.

[Zackgeno96]

It seems many new bounty hunters are joining this forum weekly or monthly, every single bounty campaign is full of thousands of participants, my claim is some bounty managers don't care how many you really are, even if it's just 5$ for each bounty participants, this is plain bad, I remember telling bubbalex to reduce Cartesi signature participants and I'm glad he listened, if not the reward would be very bad....

I have also participated in many altcoin bounty campaigns in the past and have witnessed in numerous spreadsheets that the social media campaigns and the article campaigns are the ones that are filled with a flood of participants but if you look at the signature campaign participants, they are in the least number as compared to the social media bounty participants. So I guess you should check the bounty type before participating as signature campaign have least participants and definitely pays better as compared to the social media bounties.

[Buttercup123]

agree , some bounty are just paying 5-10$ max for 3 month work , that really sad , its like real bounty when you try to sign up as soon as possible xd

But if you participate on other campaigns like signature campaign you can earn a lot from it and making your followers and friends more in social media can make a huge different than other bounty hunters stakes.

[ElmedoRator]

If a campaign has low reward with unlimited participants, I will rather buy the token when listed on exchange than to stress myself for the bounty activities only to get a useless reward. BM must ensure they limit participants

Most bounty participants are just trying to make money and pay for their lives, so they won't care about the amount of tokens they will receive from each project. They will participate in everything if possible, I also like you, will ignore low-budget bounty but have many participants

[crustycrab666]

We really are in a long dry season. Many projects are a scam, don't reach the target, and eventually, die. This has an impact on the bounty campaign, so that a lot of drama appears, such as extended duration without additional rewards, distribution is delayed, listings are delayed, the reward is locked, distribution is divided into several stages, etc. So. when there are projects that are truly legit, with products that work and are functional, they will surely be invaded by bounty hunters.

Well, limiting the number of participants is one of the best ways, which is why the trend of the bounty campaign has recently changed, such as:
1) there is a minimum merit requirement for a join signature campaign
2) reward distribution is divided into several stages to avoid massive selling
3) reward is locked for a certain period and unlock by a certain percentage every day
It looks difficult, but that's a fact. Bounty hunters must adapt to this increasingly difficult ecosystem. In the hope of a successful project, so don't give up, luck may be on your way.

[ahyadinnn]

I have also participated in many altcoin bounty campaigns in the past and have witnessed in numerous spreadsheets that the social media campaigns and the article campaigns are the ones that are filled with a flood of participants but if you look at the signature campaign participants, they are in the least number as compared to the social media bounty participants. So I guess you should check the bounty type before participating as signature campaign have least participants and definitely pays better as compared to the social media bounties.

actually depending on the project you are taking, sometimes the allocation of social media is more than the signature and you can get a lot of results also from social media on condition that you have to have enough friends in your social media

[makishart]

If a campaign has low reward with unlimited participants, I will rather buy the token when listed on exchange than to stress myself for the bounty activities only to get a useless reward. BM must ensure they limit participants

Most bounty participants are just trying to make money and pay for their lives, so they won't care about the amount of tokens they will receive from each project. They will participate in everything if possible, I also like you, will ignore low-budget bounty but have many participants

I think some managers have already applied the rules to give limit for the participants. You can see some managers have already closed the spreadsheet before the bounty has already ended.
The result of bounty can't be speculated even bounty with big allocation can go to the zero value. More campaign and more change for them to get money.