Limited participants is the best option for bounty campaigns this days

[coinfinger]

This is just the truth, limited participants for bounty campaigns comes with several beneifts.

1. You get the select the best hunters amongst applicants.
2. You get to reduce spam and spammy contents.

Likewise, a thread to remove task negligers after two weeks too.

1. With unlimited participants as well, you can choose the best one with whom you may want to work with. Being limited or unlimited is not a criteria. Moreover, if you fix with certain number of participants then you may miss out few highly reputed forum members. So, being unlimited will not prevent you working with the best members of this forum.

2. I agree with your point. Still, a bounty program should not allow automatic enrollment for bounties but it should be managed by expereinced bounty mangers so that they will not enroll spammers and they will give priority to high quality posting.

[Festac]

It's a very good idea to limit bounty hunters once they exceed 100 mostly for signature campaigns but it's a different thing entire for social media campaigns, this can't be limit because that's exactly what the team want, to spread the word out there, it's why I think that social media campaigns should have more allocation than the rest

[shoreno]

 good thing they listen but others wont care about others opinion  especially if they see that your only a worker on thier campaign and havent enough reputation on this forum . you care for the reward but they arent , they usually care for the exposure of the project and thier budget   .  i also think that projects with bigger participants are the ones that are going to be more succesful and legit because they only pay less anyways but those are promise to pay big usually dont make thier promise  

[Guryon_master]

Seems that bounty is your only primary way of earning, I would suggest that you should have to find another aside from it.  Not all bounty managers will listen to some suggestion for they will only accept what they thing is best to the project.

[Greatdev]

Limiting bounty participants is good, this will make bounty hunters want to work more for bounty projects another time, promoting a bounty project for 12 weeks and getting 10$ reward is so depressing, maybe we should start making bounty managers see reasons to this and hopefully some will take to correction

[Divinespark]

This is just the truth, limited participants for bounty campaigns comes with several beneifts.

1. You get the select the best hunters amongst applicants.
2. You get to reduce spam and spammy contents.

Likewise, a thread to remove task negligers after two weeks too.

To reduce spam, simply select and accept participants who have good and quality posts. You cannot reduce the amount of spam by limiting them. Limiting the participants to only guarantee the rights of the bounty hunter, they will surely get more money and deserve the work and time they spend on it.

[fvb]

Of course, this is the best option.  For example, in a subscription company, for example, a restriction of one hundred or a maximum of two hundred members.  Also with social networks and other companies.  The project itself can select participants by quality and rank on the forum.  I think that this is better for the project itself.

[chmod755]

This option is good to keep some "high" rewards between the participants, some bounties don't have much money allocated on it, and choosing a limited number o participants can easily help to no draw and keep interested between those are joining.

[WannaCry]

probably yes, its better to have a limited participants for biunty this days, as some of the project has a limited bounty pool as well

[JahriMeayer]

I agree with you, I think the newbie account that has not been in six months he is not eligible to participate in the bounty campaign, they must adapt to the forum first to increase their knowledge in this forum, and the bounty manager limits the participants is very good

[Henrobakkara]

As the campaign that I am taking part now only accepts 33 participants to join and in my opinion by limiting the participants we will get paid according to the work while supporting the project. I just hope that in the future there will be more bounties that limit the number of participants

[bitkanu]

probably yes, its better to have a limited participants for biunty this days, as some of the project has a limited bounty pool as well

The percentage of projects that limiting its participants is really small compared with the project that doesn't apply that rules. The problem is how the developer wanna try to do that while they needs a lot of publication and it must be everywhere and that needs a lot of marketers.

[Ozero]

As the campaign that I am taking part now only accepts 33 participants to join and in my opinion by limiting the participants we will get paid according to the work while supporting the project. I just hope that in the future there will be more bounties that limit the number of participants

It should be borne in mind that any ICO team is interested in attracting as many project participants as possible to advertise it. Therefore, the restriction of the participants in the ICO bounty is not really necessary for the team. If fixed rates are set, then of course, a limit is set for participants in connection with the volume of allocated new tokens.
In this case, 33 signatories of the campaign may not be able to cope with the task and the project may fail. In this case, bounty hunters will not receive any reward at all.

[daglordjames]

It seems many new bounty hunters are joining this forum weekly or monthly, every single bounty campaign is full of thousands of participants, my claim is some bounty managers don't care how many you really are, even if it's just 5$ for each bounty participants, this is plain bad, I remember telling bubbalex to reduce Cartesi signature participants and I'm glad he listened, if not the reward would be very bad....

Well, yeah I think it's better to have limitations how man participates will join in a bounty campaign so that the reward of the hunters will be better.

[JHORN]

Too much bounty hunters on a single bounty campaign is not good, this will only favour the project team not bounty hunters, that fact is project team care less about how much rewards gets to each bounty hunters, bounty managers should be the ones to fix this issue or make the team see reasons

[Kotone]

Thats how promoting is. The competition for campaign is really hard for those limited campaign that pays good reward. Also only good poster were able to join campaigns that pay btc. For the altcoin sections there are in the past employing limited participants but since the demand for bounty is decreasing we dony have much choice but to pick on the current ones but honestly there is not much good campaigns now.

[Towerbreeze]

The problem is we have too low bounty campaigns, if there is enough campaigns this will get many bounty hunters occupied, there won't be too many participants on the spreadsheet, not all bounty managers will bide by this rule of limiting participants, we all know that it's all in favour to the developers

[TanakabZX]

This strategy should work well but bouny projects with high reward allocation don't need to limit bounty participants, like 100k to 300k or more will want many participants to join to achieve high awareness easily but the problem is value will drop once trading starts, this is one big problem about bounties

[lienfaye]

It seems many new bounty hunters are joining this forum weekly or monthly, every single bounty campaign is full of thousands of participants, my claim is some bounty managers don't care how many you really are, even if it's just 5$ for each bounty participants, this is plain bad, I remember telling bubbalex to reduce Cartesi signature participants and I'm glad he listened, if not the reward would be very bad....

Reducing the participants means high rewards for bounty hunters but its on the dev's discretion. Having more to advertise their project is favor to them because it can maximize the exposure by spreading awareness here in the forum and in different social media platforms. In bounties having low rewards are not only the problem because even choosing a legit project is hard to spot nowadays.

[Lizzylove1]

If a campaign has low reward with unlimited participants, I will rather buy the token when listed on exchange than to stress myself for the bounty activities only to get a useless reward. BM must ensure they limit participants