If the signature campaings are removed from the forum, will you stay or leave?

[Shamm]

For me, I am here to learn. I have learned a lot from the time I have spent here. So, I will still be here, even if the signature campaign is removed.

Opps no offend to you but what I saw in your post history is from bounty campaigns and I think you not telling the truth it seems you came here for a campaign and earn some extra money.
proof   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2134804;sa=showPosts


PS. You need to be true in yourself don't trick or lie to yourself
[Edited]

I am here to learn.

Don't lie! You've posted the word "Twitter" 1841 times, and the word "Facebook" 1337 times. That's more than 7 times per post on average, I didn't even bother counting the Telegram links and shitcoin addresses you've posted to support money grabbing ICO scams.

[krishnaverma]

What percentage of members here are wearing a signature and getting paid for it ? I think less than 1%

Hope you got the point.

[yahoo62278]

I am here to learn.

Don't lie! You've posted the word "Twitter" 1841 times, and the word "Facebook" 1337 times. That's more than 7 times per post on average, I didn't even bother counting the Telegram links and shitcoin addresses you've posted to support money grabbing ICO scams.

Probably unnecessary to call out a Jr member for giving his opinion when more then 50% who have posted in this thread are probably lying as well.

What percentage of members here are wearing a signature and getting paid for it ? I think less than 1%

Hope you got the point.

Depends on if you are talking active members or total accounts made. If we are talking active members then I'd say closer to 70% or better are wearing a sig and being paid

[LoyceV]

Probably unnecessary to call out a Jr member for giving his opinion when more then 50% who have posted in this thread are probably lying as well.

Fair point.

What percentage of members here are wearing a signature and getting paid for it ? I think less than 1%

Depends on if you are talking active members or total accounts made. If we are talking active members then I'd say closer to 70% or better are wearing a sig and being paid

Check Active users in the past 24 hours: the ones without signature are Newbie bounty spammers who's account doesn't allow wearing a signature.

[Chaim Herzog41]

I will stay, No change  

[_BlackStar]

I will stay, No change  

With the same number of posts until you come back tomorrow?

Check Active users in the past 24 hours: the ones without signature are Newbie bounty spammers who's account doesn't allow wearing a signature.

Most of the active posters are posters with signature ^{[bitcoin or token]} and the exception is newbie and I just see it like that. There are very few established users who don't use paid signature, I can't estimate the number but they are genuinely interested in bitcoin. Without a signature they are willing to stay, but without bitcoin who will use this forum again?

It's clear that most of them are spammer signature posters, but I'm excluding bitcoin paid signature posters in general although until now it would have been difficult for any manager to deter spammers in their campaign or bounty. But I don't think forums need to remove signature campaign because with that contributors get very little benefit.

@LoyceV, this is a good look.

[LTU_btc]

Stop using a forum because of the signature option seems a little exagerated. Except if the user only wants to show the signature...

Btw, i miss the userbars;
https://varievo.com/wp-content/uploads/Userbars.png

Thank you for bringing me some nostalgia. I participated in one football forum maybe 10 years ago and it was full of such signatures with clubs logo. It looked lovely.

as i have sigs disabled forum wide, i probably wouldnt even notice except for the avatars on some posts might change.

You wouldn't notice if signatures would be banned, but I'm sure that you would notice changes in content and activity.

Probably unnecessary to call out a Jr member for giving his opinion when more then 50% who have posted in this thread are probably lying as well.

I'm wondering how many people who posted here are really honest. Maybe some of them lie not intentionally. It's easy to tell that I would stay not matter what, but when it comes to real actions, situation may be different. Something similar when people promise that they will start going to gym from Monday or New Year, but we all know that very few of such promises turn into reality.

[Lucius]

I'm wondering how many people who posted here are really honest. Maybe some of them lie not intentionally.

If we take the poll results, in my opinion, they are quite real considering that almost 50% said "I will stay but less active.", and on the other hand a little more than 30% said "I will stay, No change.", while 6% choose the answer that they will leave in that case.

The problem has never been that there are signature campaigns, but that there are not good enough managers who want to set high enough standards to prevent shitposters from participating in them. Apply high standards to all campaigns and we will no longer have to open topics like this.

[cygan]

so even if the signature campaigns would not exist here in the future, i would still be active here in the forum and share or expand my knowledge with other users
through the forum you have also gained a kind of trust in certain users here and also in the future this forum will show us much more interesting things and spread knowledge

just my 2 satoshis

[TheBeardedBaby]

It was an interesting reading guys, thank you.
Even that this question was posted before it's always good to have a fresh overview.
I guess not everyone was honest in their answer but that's how it's IRL too.
So.. 69 votes, 69 posts (without this one) such a beautiful number to finish this thread

I'm locking it and now everyone can see the poll

Thanks for participating guys.