[update] jamyr trust

[jamyr]

As everybody can see, supposedly rehabilitated jamyr has decided to once again not explain whether the loan he took was repaid or not. There is of course the obligatory wall of text one would expect when misdirection is attempted. With that attitude, it means the feedback he received (both negative and neutral) was justified and there no reason to remove any of the tags.

Argumentum ad populom.
I'm voting you as Miss Bitcointalk since it looks like youre uo for popularity contest.

I am Pleading the 5th;

According to a book in Criminal Law Ive read which upon looking at a wikipedia entry states that :

mmmmm mmmmmmm mmmmmm , mmmmmm mmmmm mmm.

An accused cannot be compelled to provide you self-incriminating information just because you are holding my ability to apply to some gigs like a campaign .

I will do your research for you, although I will ask a fee of 0.0001 satoshis every hour I spent investigating from a neutral point of view. xd


Did you quote my post just to look like youre making a sensible response. Creative,

[AB de Royse777]

Also, pushing people to remove the feedback just because the accuser changed their mind shouldn't be a norm. The accuser may have forgiven him, but the fact remains that he did what he did. Trust just doesn't build up overnight, especially when you messed it up at some point.

I don't think with those neutral tags anyone will be willing to give him a single penny upfront, not just a loan. These neutral on his feedback page is enough to protect any sensible lender.

But is there are red feedback needed anymore? I personally don't think it needed. With this red feedback many campaign manager including me will have high doubt to take him in any signature campaign (I have 2 but I think the power of those 2 has faded so much that it's now a joke to see these red feedback. A red feedback by default indicates that one person can not be trusted with money, is it the case for me? no. These 2 red tag are more personal than rational).

I already said earlier, greater engagement and more useful participation on the forum is a better way to improve your reputation.

Ability to joining a signature campaign plays a major role for a lot of members in this forum to shape their characters. Not everyone is suchmoon, gmaxwell, achow101 or many others like them.


You are wasting your time with JollyGood. You better be working with removing the supports on the flag you have from the following users:
suchmoon, jokers10, Charles-Tim, Smartvirus, Igebotz, decodx, notblox1, BoXXoB, shoreno, komisariatku, Gladitorcomeback, Unknown Op
I hope all you don't mind me mentioning you.

[igebotz]

There's absolutely nothing left to support here. I withdraw my support but I'm leaving a neutral tag and ~jamyr

I'm not sure how you got into this situation in the first place, but our little conversation on the Bitcointalk party discord server a while back was cool, and you appeared to be a lovely guy at the time. GL on your transformation journey.

AB de Royse777 alleged the following, but later withdrew it

[jokers10]

You better be working with removing the supports on the flag you have from the following users:

I learned the case development and can agree that if an initiator of a flag of this type forgave the one got the flag, there's no more reason for holding my support for this flag. As for additional tags, there's a plenty of them already, but if someone will decide to leave a flag of first type for jamyr, they can tag me and I'm going to support such type of flag for him, because a long overdue loan (appeared when he failed to complete the task he applied) is a warning sign in any case.

Thanks for attracting my attention.

[shasan]

I learned the case development and can agree that if an initiator of a flag of this type forgave the one got the flag, there's no more reason for holding my support for this flag. As for additional tags, there's a plenty of them already, but if someone will decide to leave a flag of first type for jamyr, they can tag me and I'm going to support such type of flag for him, because a long overdue loan (appeared when he failed to complete the task he applied) is a warning sign in any case.

Thanks for attracting my attention.

I agree with you but at the same time the user who has given the negative trust and/or supported the flag might be considered based on the thinking of that user. If they feel the person who has negative trust need to wait to remove or won't remove then there is nothing to do.

[jamyr]

Thank you everybody and apologies for being delinquent yet again.

--

Thank you Royse for flagging my action , if not for this I might have fallen even more/worse And thank you for letting me do some micro-gigs so that I may be able to at least pay you somehow.
And to everybody like yahooo and Loyce and others which Id rather not mention for their peace.
To my other obligation(s) which I may or may not have made myself whole, apologies for delay but I did/will fulfill my part or some other way.

To Lauda/Marlboroza/UltraElite which were the first to have raised awareness that I am delinquent , wish you guys are safe and sorry if it seem like I am going to my old ways. i just have a very long list of obligation and I had to put the other thing first.

Cheers also to Jollygood. I would appreciate it if you will change ur feedback to neutral, but its cool if you wont.