🔥 No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 💸 500$ Wagering Contest 💸

[Mahdirakib]

Looks like the post bumpers are really helping this thread to appear at the top. As a result, it is getting the attention of other forum members, and the forum members are continuously making discussions here. Everyone is discussing about KYC and No-KYC related things, but no one is talking about the NoToKYC.com services. Does any of you agree with listing system of NoToKYC? They are providing inaccurate information about the KYC verification requirement of the casinos.

[MainIbem]

I have played in many casinos and I have not done KYC before, maybe it could be because I have not won big amount of money that might forced the casinos to request for KYC which is always in their TOS. So, no KYC still exist since it is not mandatory to do it before you deposit, play and withdraw unless maybe the casino suspect some unusual activities with the player.

Anyone who loves privacy would definitely avoid KYC, not everyone would want to expose their identity to a platform for certain reasons but just like you said a player might come across it one way or the other whether they like it or not. Some casinos who claim to be non kyc would request for it when they're suspicious of certain amount you deposit into your wallet while others might request for it when you win a huge amount of money to be sure you don't go against their gambling policy, like gambling below the age bracket of 18+.

[Zwei]

Sorry if this is a bit off-topic and I’m not trying to defend Wina here, but don’t you think they would never have considered taking this case to court if they knew they were at fault?

nope, but they were not threatening to sue him over the win that they didn't want to pay, they were threatening to sue him over the scam accusation he posted. i doubt they were actually going to go through with that, it was just a scare tactic imo to get him to agree to the "deal", and it kinda worked since he took the post down.

As I said earlier, one of the main reasons service providers ask customers to complete kyc (they usually do this right before banning the account) is to profile cheaters. In this case, they simply wanted to know who that person was so they can deal with him in person.

fair enough.

It’s a complicated case. You may think what they did was unethical, while someone else may say they were within their rights to do so in order to protect their business.

both can be true at the same time, to protect their business they do unethical shit.

Looks like the post bumpers are really helping this thread to appear at the top. As a result, it is getting the attention of other forum members, and the forum members are continuously making discussions here.

at least there aren't that many shilling accounts anymore (unless their posts get deleted before i see them).

Everyone is discussing about KYC and No-KYC related things, but no one is talking about the NoToKYC.com services. Does any of you agree with listing system of NoToKYC? They are providing inaccurate information about the KYC verification requirement of the casinos.

i think i made my opinion about NoToKYC crystal clear, their listing system is bullshit.

[Wakate]

Everyone is discussing about KYC and No-KYC related things, but no one is talking about the NoToKYC.com services. Does any of you agree with listing system of NoToKYC? They are providing inaccurate information about the KYC verification requirement of the casinos.

Almost all these casinos are crazy liers and they will do everything possible to get you to use their platform to play bets since they'll gonna make money from that. I have some annoying experiences from some of the advertised casinos here and I just have to keep my grudges to myself because writing and complaining would not solve the problem when the casino team knows what they are doing. Make a deposit through Solana network on Cloudbet and tell if you will not be asked to do level 2 KYC before any withdrawal.

[noorman0]

Looks like the post bumpers are really helping this thread to appear at the top. As a result, it is getting the attention of other forum members, and the forum members are continuously making discussions here. Everyone is discussing about KYC and No-KYC related things, but no one is talking about the NoToKYC.com services. Does any of you agree with listing system of NoToKYC? They are providing inaccurate information about the KYC verification requirement of the casinos.

This isn't a matter of agreeing or disagreeing, as the decision of changes is up to the developer, but rather whether you need this site or not. It's clear that the casinos on their list are licensed, meaning KYC is inevitable. This inaccuracy also won't put them on the list of leading non-KYC service monitors, meaning they won't be any different from well-known affiliate sites.
On the contrary, this forum has ample resources for more accurate casino information.

[God Of Thunder]

The term of No KYC these days are attributed for not forcing user to do a mandatory KYCon their withdrawal or registration which other casino is now enforcing.

Even big casino now do a mandatory KYC to all existing members. I believe this No KYC casino knew this facts on tightening KYC that’s why they are trying to their KYC flexibility as way to have a pseudo No KYC feature.

Yes, I believe a large number of players left Stake when they implemented full KYC mode and no longer allowed new users without a KYC. Not only is staking a trend, but more and more casinos are now adopting it, and it is getting worse. Still, some casinos include 'No KYC' in their title, on social media, and in ads, but the reality is that they reserve the right to ask for a KYC, and they will trigger the KYC process immediately after a big win. That has been the case for a year or more.

BTW, is notokyc.com supposed to list only the purely no-KYC casinos? I see that they are listing KYC casinos and applying some levels to them. I don't think it's fair enough to promote KYC casinos. Some of my clients are KYC casinos, and they even tried to approach notokyc.com.

[gunhell16]

The term of No KYC these days are attributed for not forcing user to do a mandatory KYCon their withdrawal or registration which other casino is now enforcing.

Even big casino now do a mandatory KYC to all existing members. I believe this No KYC casino knew this facts on tightening KYC that’s why they are trying to their KYC flexibility as way to have a pseudo No KYC feature.

Yes, I believe a large number of players left Stake when they implemented full KYC mode and no longer allowed new users without a KYC. Not only is staking a trend, but more and more casinos are now adopting it, and it is getting worse. Still, some casinos include 'No KYC' in their title, on social media, and in ads, but the reality is that they reserve the right to ask for a KYC, and they will trigger the KYC process immediately after a big win. That has been the case for a year or more.

BTW, is notokyc.com supposed to list only the purely no-KYC casinos? I see that they are listing KYC casinos and applying some levels to them. I don't think it's fair enough to promote KYC casinos. Some of my clients are KYC casinos, and they even tried to approach notokyc.com.

Until now, when you're at the point of withdrawing large amounts, they really require KYC, these kinds of situations aren't new anymore, I can't really say this is an issue either.
Especially if it's a regulated crypto casino that's demanding KYC from their users.

And KYC is only required when the amount you're withdrawing is really large, because in my experience, for amounts below $100 like around $80, I haven't experienced being asked for KYC,
but this has only happened to me once anyway.

[Barikui1]

You raise a fair point—KYC isn’t a magic bullet that stops every fraud, and the evidence that it single handedly eliminates scams is mixed. What studies and industry reports do show is that robust KYC processes.

At the same time, many players are wary of sharing personal data, especially when breaches have exposed millions of records in the past. That’s why some jurisdictions allow  optional KYC for low‑risk accounts—customers can still deposit and play, but with caps on withdrawals or transaction limits until they choose to verify their identity.

I don't actually gamble on a consistent basis but the few casino I have an account with, it's either it is a mandatory kyc before making withdrawals or you must surely do kyc from the very onset after registration.
I have also heard and knows of some casinos that only ask for kyc only when large withdrawal is about to be made.

 I know that they are trying to reduce the rate at which the casinos are being used for money laundering, but in my opinion, asking for kyc verification wouldn't eliminate it entirely, and since most gamblers and users don't joke with privacy, they will prefer not even gambling with such casino than giving out a single details of themselves to the casino.

[GeorgeJohn]

<...>

The problem is that you do not know about kyc till you withdraw money.
And it is impossible to withdraw money without kyc.

Everyone is permitted to read the rules and regulations of a casino or any gambling website before betting with them, if you don't understand the rules and regulations of the casino please don't bet, people remember what they're supposed to do when theirs a problem, they're some gambling website that KYC is required and verified before you can have access to make a withdrawal, so we need to understand the protocols of gambling site before we bet.

[Mahdirakib]

at least there aren't that many shilling accounts anymore (unless their posts get deleted before i see them).

Shilling activity is still good enough on this thread. Around 60 posts have been deleted from this thread based on my report within last 30 days. Maybe some other users are also reporting to those shilling posts.

This isn't a matter of agreeing or disagreeing, as the decision of changes is up to the developer, but rather whether you need this site or not. It's clear that the casinos on their list are licensed, meaning KYC is inevitable. This inaccuracy also won't put them on the list of leading non-KYC service monitors, meaning they won't be any different from well-known affiliate sites.

No, it matters a lot. They are providing misleading and false information. As a result, many people might register in some casinos by thinking that those platforms won't ask them to complete the KYC verification. A casino directory should have transparency, NoToKYC doesn’t have any transparency.

[MainIbem]

Everyone is permitted to read the rules and regulations of a casino or any gambling website before betting with them, if you don't understand the rules and regulations of the casino please don't bet, people remember what they're supposed to do when theirs a problem, they're some gambling website that KYC is required and verified before you can have access to make a withdrawal, so we need to understand the protocols of gambling site before we bet.

Even though they understand the TOS I believe that there's a customer support that's functioning very well which would aid any customer in whatever issues or thing they need to understand about the casino. Although some TOS can be very bulky and I'm quite sure that a good number of customers barely got time to read it, most get carried away by a bonus or good offers by casino and end up complaining when they're required to do KYC later on. However i's not the casino's fault that some customers are so lazy to go through their terms and conditions.

[GiftedMAN]

Everyone is permitted to read the rules and regulations of a casino or any gambling website before betting with them, if you don't understand the rules and regulations of the casino please don't bet, people remember what they're supposed to do when theirs a problem, they're some gambling website that KYC is required and verified before you can have access to make a withdrawal, so we need to understand the protocols of gambling site before we bet.

The rules and regulations are not hidden in every casino the problem lies with the customers who do not take their time to go through the rules before gambling they only go back to check the rules and regulations when there are problems relating to withdrawals I think it shouldn't be on the casinos because they provided the rules and they can't force anyone to read it before agreeing with their terms and condition.

The issue of KYC before withdrawal is something that some casinos do not state in their rules before gamblers begin to gamble if all casinos will make it clear that there must be KYC before withdrawals gamblers will no longer complain but when they do not talk about KYC in their rules they shouldn't bring it up during withdrawals that has always been my point.

[GeorgeJohn]

Everyone is permitted to read the rules and regulations of a casino or any gambling website before betting with them, if you don't understand the rules and regulations of the casino please don't bet, people remember what they're supposed to do when theirs a problem, they're some gambling website that KYC is required and verified before you can have access to make a withdrawal, so we need to understand the protocols of gambling site before we bet.

Even though they understand the TOS I believe that there's a customer support that's functioning very well which would aid any customer in whatever issues or thing they need to understand about the casino. Although some TOS can be very bulky and I'm quite sure that a good number of customers barely got time to read it, most get carried away by a bonus or good offers by casino and end up complaining when they're required to do KYC later on. However i's not the casino's fault that some customers are so lazy to go through their terms and conditions.

Been carried away by the bonus shows that the client or the customer is incompetent of following the tradition of gambling, in everything you do, the primary thing to do is to the law of the environment before you commence operation, without knowing the law that abides the environment of the place, it's obvious that you can face any challenges that might result to the environment

Evaluating it to gambling, the primary concerns of every gambler is to grab the terms and conditions of the gambling website so that they can have access to withdraw whenever they win, but boycotting the the protocol of the site, it will make us to face unexpected challenges.

[Zwei]

This isn't a matter of agreeing or disagreeing, as the decision of changes is up to the developer, but rather whether you need this site or not. It's clear that the casinos on their list are licensed, meaning KYC is inevitable. This inaccuracy also won't put them on the list of leading non-KYC service monitors, meaning they won't be any different from well-known affiliate sites.

No, it matters a lot. They are providing misleading and false information. As a result, many people might register in some casinos by thinking that those platforms won't ask them to complete the KYC verification. A casino directory should have transparency, NoToKYC doesn’t have any transparency.

i agree, and NoToKYC themselves know that, else they won't be avoiding answering our questions.
they did try doing that at first (if you check the first few pages of this thread), but they gave up once they saw their bs answers are not working.

Even though they understand the TOS I believe that there's a customer support that's functioning very well which would aid any customer in whatever issues or thing they need to understand about the casino. Although some TOS can be very bulky and I'm quite sure that a good number of customers barely got time to read it, most get carried away by a bonus or good offers by casino and end up complaining when they're required to do KYC later on.

you actually don't need to read the full terms, most of it is just legal bla bla bla anyway. you only need to check the parts that are important to you as a player, list of restricted counties, deposits, withdrawals, KYC and AML details (maybe something else i'm forgetting?).
also we have chatgpt now, so you can copy and paste the full terms and ask him for a summary.

[Promocodeudo]

Everyone is permitted to read the rules and regulations of a casino or any gambling website before betting with them, if you don't understand the rules and regulations of the casino please don't bet, people remember what they're supposed to do when theirs a problem, they're some gambling website that KYC is required and verified before you can have access to make a withdrawal, so we need to understand the protocols of gambling site before we bet.

You're absolutely right here, as a gambler, it is expected of you to read through the terms and conditions of the gambling platform you want to involve yourself into because if you don't, whatever happens later should be your burden as a player, but we should also understand that in terms of Casinos mandating their players to do KYC, the KYC can come when you want to withraw your win and it mighg not be captured earlier in the casino terms and conditions or their rules and regulations, I think I have something about this before, regulation is a continues process, a casino can change their method of doing things and because that's because they subjected to the government regulatory body, they won't have any option than to enforce any review by the government.

[mitchr4]

snip

snip

Usually when gamblers want to play in casino they do not read terms and conditions 
They simply want to play 

It's not a big problem if you don't read the Terms and Conditions, but if something unexpected happens while you're playing, don't expect to avoid it. Actually when register, we've already agreed to all of their rules. Reading and understanding the T&C is better than skipping it, because it helps us know the limits and restrictions on the site whether it's about playing, depositing, or withdrawing.

[Joy- maker]

This isn't a matter of agreeing or disagreeing, as the decision of changes is up to the developer, but rather whether you need this site or not. It's clear that the casinos on their list are licensed, meaning KYC is inevitable. This inaccuracy also won't put them on the list of leading non-KYC service monitors, meaning they won't be any different from well-known affiliate sites.

No, it matters a lot. They are providing misleading and false information. As a result, many people might register in some casinos by thinking that those platforms won't ask them to complete the KYC verification. A casino directory should have transparency, NoToKYC doesn’t have any transparency.

Sincerely speaking I don't know why some users here are blaming people for not paying proper attention to the rules and regulation of the casinos or gambling platform's they want to be betting with. Without them understanding that all these casinos and gambling platforms are just misleading people with false information on their platform. because I don't understand whereby a casino or a gambling platform will clearly state on their platforms that they are kyc free and after registering on the casino or on the gambling platform and start betting with them, let's say for a short period of time and you decide to make a withdrawal one day, and  all of a sudden boom they start requesting for your kysc before you can be able to make withdrawal why the clearly stated on their platform from the beginning that they are kyc free platforms, and so users here still have the gods to be pouring blames on people, for not paying proper attention to the rules and regulation of the casinos and gambling platforms.

[noorman0]

No, it matters a lot. They are providing misleading and false information. As a result, many people might register in some casinos by thinking that those platforms won't ask them to complete the KYC verification. A casino directory should have transparency, NoToKYC doesn’t have any transparency.

I understand your point, and I'm not trying to defend the NoToKYC developers here. Their claims are clearly misleading, but as I said, you can't change anything without the owner's consent. Furthermore, they apparently have a different understanding of "no KYC".

I answered it many times now, the casinos have to include KYC TERMS if they have a license even if they will never do KYC! Not the government, the casinos is the one who has the decision of require KYC from a User. My KYC levels are dicussed with the casino teams!

They consider the account verification asked by the casino not to be KYC. And what they don't understand is, without regulatory pressure and the threat of sanctions, what crypto casinos want to implement KYC for.

[UserU]

The problem is, there are only a few no KYC casinos. Go to Notokyc.com and see that they listed 19 casinos; how many of them are actually no KYC? Of course, I am not a player of all those casinos. However, I played on the BC game, and I know it is a KYC-hungry casino. The regulators are getting stricter, and there are barely any KYC casinos around. All the licensed casinos actually ask for a KYC at some point, unless they explicitly mention that they have no KYC.

There are some casinos that claim to be a no KYC, but their TOS page clearly mentions that they reserve the right to perform KYC, which can be triggered anytime. Even though I do not like KYC at all, I still use those casinos because you don't have soo many other options.

I have played in many casinos and I have not done KYC before, maybe it could be because I have not won big amount of money that might forced the casinos to request for KYC which is always in their TOS. So, no KYC still exist since it is not mandatory to do it before you deposit, play and withdraw unless maybe the casino suspect some unusual activities with the player.

Not too long ago, I faced a KYC request for attempting to withdraw an amount less than $20 in crypto, and that gambling site didn't even have any license to operate any live games. That's a rarer case tho

[God Of Thunder]

Not too long ago, I faced a KYC request for attempting to withdraw an amount less than $20 in crypto, and that gambling site didn't even have any license to operate any live games. That's a rarer case tho

That is terrible, mate. I think you are not alone in facing such an issue. I suppose I also triggered KYC on a casino for around $20, which was actually my deposit, and not any bonus. The casino requested a KYC, and I refused to complete it, then gambled away within a few minutes. It just shows how hungry they are for a KYC. I cannot think of any valid reason why a casino would require me to do KYC for $20 if I am not from a restricted region. I have thoroughly reviewed the casino terms, and I am not from a restricted region. These are just terrible experiences. I don't mind if the casino asks for a KYC if I request significant withdrawals.