Here is the actual bill.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/217067121/Virtual-Currency-Tax-Reform-ActIt does not levy any kind of sales taxes on Bitcoin. What is does do is treat Bitcoin as currency for tax purposes and this has two implications.
1) A $200 per transaction exemption for "personal transactions"
2) A higher tax rate equal to that of currency transactions.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/988The net effect of this is to encourage the use of Bitcoin for day to day transactions by eliminating the bookkeeping burden for small transactions while increasing the tax burden of those using Bitcoin as an instrument for speculation.
For governments to treat Bitcoin as currency simply makes a lot of sense and consequently this bill in on the right track.
OK.. so I'm now somewhat on the fence... Did some research and confirmed the 200 exemption... Unfortunately as far as I can tell it has stayed 200 since inception in 1997 and is not being indexed for inflation. In today's world, it is really easy to rack up a $200 bill, so the majority of people are still going to have to track at least some of their transactions. I still see a need for tracking to be integrated into wallets. ( Also, coin control becomes even more important.. use the "high gain" coins for <$200 transactions, and use the "low gain" coins for >$200 )
So, as wallet tracking integration is still needed either way, we can remove that from the equation.
It all boils down to: capital gains (lower) tax rate on all transactions vs. standard income (higher) tax rates on just the bigger transactions. Either way some people win, some lose. I can't at this time say which method results in more people winning.
Sigg